World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. van Noordwijk

M. van Noordwijk

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Kenya
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 81 401 370 1 1 292 25504

M. van Noordwijk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. van Noordwijk between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. van Noordwijk published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2014. 13 of the 538 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2014. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 3 publications
1978 2026

538 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. van Noordwijk: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 5
1991 10
1992 7
1993 8
1994 7
1995 8
1996 11
1997 4
1998 11
1999 9
2000 9
2001 9
2002 13
2003 3
2004 21
2005 9
2006 4
2007 8
2008 11
2009 7
2010 16
2011 14
2012 16
2013 14
2014 44
2015 29
2016 27
2017 20
2018 15
2019 11
2020 29
2021 22
2022 32
2023 35
2024 11
2025 10
2026 3
Total 538
Download as CSV

M. van Noordwijk publications per year - data summary

  • M. van Noordwijk, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from World Agroforestry Centre, has 538 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 44 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1978, with 1 publication.
  • 4 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.0 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 91 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1994: 53 publications (3.1 per year); 1995-2011: 167 publications (9.8 per year); 2012-2026: 318 publications (21.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

M. van Noordwijk publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. van Noordwijk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–295 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 292 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26 292
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

M. van Noordwijk publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 88 ranges running from 36–40 to 467+ publications.
  • M. van Noordwijk, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from World Agroforestry Centre, records 292 publications - the 92nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 92% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than M. van Noordwijk, and about 8% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 136–140 publications range, and M. van Noordwijk ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 111–115 publications, holding 255 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 55% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 141–145 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 467 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

M. van Noordwijk D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. van Noordwijk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16 81
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

M. van Noordwijk D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 80 ranges running from 30 to 109+ D-Index.
  • M. van Noordwijk, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from World Agroforestry Centre, records 81 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than M. van Noordwijk, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and M. van Noordwijk ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 288 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 66% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Kenya Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity

M. van Noordwijk focuses on Agroforestry, Agronomy, Agriculture, Soil science and Root system. His research integrates issues of Root distribution, Deforestation, Climate change, Cropping system and Pruning in his study of Agroforestry. His Agronomy research includes elements of Plant ecology, Nutrient, Leaching and Subsoil.

His Agriculture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Land use and Crop. His study in the fields of Soil water and Root density under the domain of Soil science overlaps with other disciplines such as Distribution and Investigation methods. His biological study deals with issues like Sampling, which deal with fields such as Soil core.

His most cited work include:

  • Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? (536 citations)
  • Root methods: A handbook (282 citations)
  • Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency (253 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Agroforestry, Agronomy, Agriculture, Ecosystem services and Land use. His Agroforestry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biodiversity, Imperata, Deforestation, Tropics and Vegetation. His Agronomy research incorporates elements of Soil water, Soil fertility and Nutrient.

His study focuses on the intersection of Agriculture and fields such as Climate change with connections in the field of Greenhouse gas. His work deals with themes such as Social responsibility, Sustainability and Reforestation, which intersect with Ecosystem services. His studies deal with areas such as Ecosystem and Environmental resource management as well as Land use.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agroforestry (39.52%)
  • Agronomy (28.23%)
  • Agriculture (14.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2018)?

  • Agroforestry (39.52%)
  • Agriculture (14.52%)
  • Land use (12.10%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agroforestry, Agriculture, Land use, Sustainability and Environmental planning. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Allanblackia, Biodiversity, Plant morphology, Climate change and Elettaria cardamomum. His work in the fields of Land use, land-use change and forestry overlaps with other areas such as Corporate governance.

The various areas that M. van Noordwijk examines in his Land use study include Indigenous, Water scarcity and Environmental resource management. His Sustainability research integrates issues from Domestication, Allanblackia stuhlmannii, Livelihood and Ecosystem services. M. van Noordwijk focuses mostly in the field of Environmental planning, narrowing it down to matters related to Sustainable forest management and, in some cases, Land tenure.

Between 2013 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Advances in knowledge of processes in soil–tree–crop interactions in parkland systems in the West African Sahel: A review (46 citations)
  • Reform or reversal: the impact of REDD+ readiness on forest governance in Indonesia (35 citations)
  • Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. (24 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity

M. van Noordwijk mainly investigates Agroforestry, Land use, Legalization, Environmental resource management and Forest management. His research in Agroforestry intersects with topics in Plant morphology, Root distribution and Competition. His Land use research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Agriculture, Food security, Woodland and Sustainability.

Water scarcity, Stakeholder, Diversity, Trend analysis and Incentive are fields of study that intersect with his Legalization research. M. van Noordwijk combines subjects such as Flooding, Land tenure, Spatial planning, Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and Sustainable forest management with his study of Environmental resource management. His studies in Forest management integrate themes in fields like Economic growth and Archipelago.

Best Publications

  • Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests.

    Quirine M Ketterings;Richard Coe;Meine van Noordwijk;Yakub Ambagau

  • Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions

    K Paustian;O Andren;H.H Janzen;R Lal

  • Trees, forests and water : Cool insights for a hot world

    David Ellison;Cindy E. Morris;Cindy E. Morris;Bruno Locatelli;Douglas Sheil

  • Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry

    Louis V. Verchot;Meine Van Noordwijk;Serigne Kandji;Thomas P. Tomich

  • Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets

    Robert J. Zomer;Henry Neufeldt;Jianchu Xu;Antje Ahrends

  • Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa

    Cheikh Mbow;Meine Van Noordwijk;Eike Luedeling;Henry Neufeldt

  • Global change and multi-species agroecosystems : Concepts and issues

    John Vandermeer;Meine van Noordwijk;Jo Anderson;Chin Ong

  • Yield gaps in oil palm: A quantitative review of contributing factors

    Lotte Suzanne Woittiez;Mark T. van Wijk;Maja Slingerland;Meine van Noordwijk;Meine van Noordwijk

  • Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency

    P. de Willigen;M. van Noordwijk

  • Root methods: A handbook

    A.L. Smit;A.G. Bengough;C. Engels;M. van Noordwijk

  • Soil carbon dynamics in the humid tropical forest zone

    Meine van Noordwijk;Carlos Cerri;Paul L. Woomer;Kusumo Nugroho

  • The central agroforestry hypothesis: the trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire

    M. G. R. Cannell;M. Van Noordwijk;C. K. Ong

  • Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity

    M. van Noordwijk;G. Lawson;A. Soumaré;J.J.R. Groot

  • Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity.

    M. van Noordwijk;G. Lawson;K. Hairiah;J. Wilson

  • The Imperata grasslands of tropical Asia: area, distribution, and typology

    D. P. Garrity;M. Soekardi;M. van Noordwijk;R. de la Cruz

  • WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems

    M. Van Noordwijk;B. Lusiana

  • Auger Sampling, Ingrowth Cores and Pinboard Methods

    Maria do Rosário G. Oliveira;M. van Noordwijk;S. R. Gaze;G. Brouwer

  • Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: current capability and future vision.

    Pete Smith;Christian A. Davies;Stephen Ogle;Giuliana Zanchi

  • Root architecture in relation to tree-soil-crop interactions and shoot pruning in agroforestry

    M. Van Noordwijk;P. Purnomosidhi

  • Litter layer residence time in forest and coffee agroforestry systems in Sumberjaya, West Lampung

    Kurniatun Hairiah;Hermi Sulistyani;Didik Suprayogo;Widianto

  • Testing the safety-net role of hedgerow tree roots by 15N placement at different soil depths

    E. C. Rowe;K. Hairiah;K. E. Giller;M. Van Noordwijk

  • Social-ecological and regional adaptation of agrobiodiversity management across a global set of research regions

    L.E. Jackson;M.M. Pulleman;L. Brussaard;K.S. Bawa

  • Environmental benefits and sustainable land-use options in the Jambi transect, Sumatra

    D. Murdiyarso;M. Van Noordwijk;U. R. Wasrin;Thomas P. Tomich

  • Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. 3. Effects on shoot growth, nitrate and water uptake efficiency.

    B. W. Veen;M. van Noordwijk;P. de Willigen;F. R. Boone

  • Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia: summary report and synthesis of phase II

    T.P. Tomich;M. Van Noordwijk;s. Budidarsono;A. Gillison

  • Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique

    M. Van Noordwijk;M. J. Kooistra;F. R. Boone;B. W. Veen

  • Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. 2. Effects of soil compaction.

    M. J. Kooistra;D. Schoonderbeek;F. R. Boone;B. W. Veen

  • Advances in knowledge of processes in soil–tree–crop interactions in parkland systems in the West African Sahel: A review

    J. Bayala;J. Sanou;Z. Teklehaimanot;S.J. Ouedraogo

  • Does Community-Based Forest Management in Indonesia Devolve Social Justice or Social Costs?

    S. De Royer;M. Van Noordwijk;J.M. Roshetko

  • How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability in multifunctional landscapes.

    M. van Noordwijk;M. H. Hoang;H. Neufeldt;I. Öborn

  • Old tree root channels in acid soils in the humid tropics: Important for crop root penetration, water infiltration and nitrogen management

    M. Van Noordwijk;Widianto;M. Heinen;Kurniatun Hairiah

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Cadisch
Georg Cadisch University of Hohenheim
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Jianchu Xu
Jianchu Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
John R. Healey
John R. Healey Bangor University
A. G. Bengough
A. G. Bengough University of Dundee
Louis V. Verchot
Louis V. Verchot Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Fergus L. Sinclair
Fergus L. Sinclair Bangor University
Eric F. Lambin
Eric F. Lambin Stanford University
John C. Moore
John C. Moore Beijing Normal University
Ingrid Öborn
Ingrid Öborn Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing M. van Noordwijk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles