World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
9965
World Ranking
6616
National Ranking
3592

Brian P. Meier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Meier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian P. Meier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Meier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian P. Meier is affiliated with Gettysburg College in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, and health.

The main topics addressed in Meier's work include psychology of moral and emotional judgment, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, cultural differences and values, COVID-19 and mental health, mindfulness and compassion interventions, death anxiety and social exclusion, and social and intergroup psychology.

Recent publications by Brian P. Meier demonstrate this range of interests, including:

  • Predictors of the intention to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 2021, Journal of Public Health
  • Social psychology and COVID-19: What the field can tell us about behavior in a pandemic, 2021, The Journal of Social Psychology

Meier frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several coauthors appearing multiple times in their work. These include Adam K. Fetterman, Amanda J. Dillard, Courtney M. Lappas, Li-Jun Ji, and Sara Konrath.

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as The Journal of Social Psychology, European Journal of Health Psychology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, and Personality and Individual Differences.

Best Publications

  • A metaphor-enriched social cognition.

    Mark J. Landau;Brian P. Meier;Lucas A. Keefer

  • Why the Sunny Side Is Up Associations Between Affect and Vertical Position

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson

  • Embodiment in Social Psychology

    Brian P. Meier;Simone S. Schnall;Norbert Schwarz;John A. Bargh

  • Why Good Guys Wear White Automatic Inferences About Stimulus Valence Based on Brightness

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson;Gerald L. Clore

  • Motivational Versus Metabolic Effects of Carbohydrates on Self-Control:

    Daniel C. Molden;Chin Ming Hui;Abigail A. Scholer;Brian P. Meier

  • What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine.

    Brian P. Meier;David J. Hauser;Michael D. Robinson;Chris Kelland Friesen

  • Mindful eating: Trait and state mindfulness predict healthier eating behavior

    Christian H. Jordan;Wan Wang;Linda R. Donatoni;Brian P. Meier

  • Development and validation of the Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS).

    Sara H. Konrath;Brian P. Meier;Brad J. Bushman

  • Turning the Other Cheek Agreeableness and the Regulation of Aggression-Related Primes

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson;Benjamin M. Wilkowski

  • When "light" and "dark" thoughts become light and dark responses: affect biases brightness judgments.

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson;L. Elizabeth Crawford;Whitney J. Ahlvers

  • Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors.

    Brian P. Meier;Sara K. Moeller;Miles Riemer-Peltz;Michael D. Robinson

  • Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation

    Brian D. Ostafin;Michael D. Robinson;Brian P. Meier

  • Watch Out! That Could Be Dangerous: Valence-Arousal Interactions in Evaluative Processing

    Michael D. Robinson;Justin Storbeck;Brian P. Meier;Ben S. Kirkeby

  • Does Quick to Blame Mean Quick to Anger? The Role of Agreeableness in Dissociating Blame and Anger

    Brian P Meier;Michael D Robinson

  • Color in Context: Psychological Context Moderates the Influence of Red on Approach- and Avoidance-Motivated Behavior

    Brian P. Meier;Paul R. D’Agostino;Andrew J. Elliot;Markus A. Maier

  • Bring It On: Angry Facial Expressions Potentiate Approach-Motivated Motor Behavior

    Benjamin M. Wilkowski;Brian P. Meier

  • Does "feeling down" mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention.

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson

  • The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life

    Mark J. Landau;Michael D. Robinson;Brian P. Meier

  • The Metaphorical Representation of Affect

    Brian P. Meier;Michael D. Robinson

  • A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual–intergroup discontinuity☆

    Brian P Meier;Verlin B Hinsz

  • Failing to take the moral high ground : Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality

    Brian P. Meier;Martin Sellbom;Dustin B. Wygant

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Robinson
Michael D. Robinson North Dakota State University
Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Verlin B. Hinsz
Verlin B. Hinsz North Dakota State University
Mark J. Landau
Mark J. Landau University of Kansas
Randy A. Sansone
Randy A. Sansone Wright State University
Abigail A. Scholer
Abigail A. Scholer University of Waterloo
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Martin Sellbom
Martin Sellbom Monash University
Clay Routledge
Clay Routledge North Dakota State University
Chester A. Insko
Chester A. Insko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related degrees and fulfilling career pathways. Many students choose to pursue graduate programs in fields like counseling, clinical psychology, or social work. Another in-demand option is speech-language pathology, which requires specialized education and certification.

If you are considering becoming a speech-language pathologist, it's essential to understand that each state has its own requirements. For example, you can learn more about the Delaware slp certification requirements or review the Florida slp certification requirements. Interested in working in the South? Discover how to become a speech language pathologist in Georgia. For those considering a career in the Pacific islands, be sure to check the Hawaii slp certification requirements.

Whether you are interested in online study options or looking to map out your career trajectory, understanding these pathways and local regulations can help you plan a rewarding future in psychology and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Brian P. Meier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles