World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Haiganoush K. Preisler

Haiganoush K. Preisler

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8435
World Ranking
6061
National Ranking
2196

Haiganoush K. Preisler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haiganoush K. Preisler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Haiganoush K. Preisler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haiganoush K. Preisler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Haiganoush K. Preisler is a researcher affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their work spans multiple disciplines within environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a notable focus on fire ecology and atmospheric processes.

Their research frequently addresses topics related to fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, ecology and vegetation dynamics, tree-ring climate responses, rangeland and wildlife management, bamboo properties and applications, and plant parasitism and resistance.

Among Preisler's recent scientific contributions are:

  • Effects of postfire climate and seed availability on postfire conifer regeneration, 2020, Ecological Applications
  • Precipitation is the most crucial factor determining the distribution of moso bamboo in Mainland China, 2020, Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Contrasting the role of human- and lightning-caused wildfires on future fire regimes on a Central Oregon landscape, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • Evaluating the effects of nitrogen and sulfur deposition and ozone on tree growth and mortality in California using a spatially comprehensive forest inventory, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Using a Statistical Model to Estimate the Effect of Wildland Fire Smoke on Ground Level PM2.5 and Asthma in California, USA, 2023, Fire

Preisler publishes regularly in environmental research-focused journals, including Environmental Research Letters, Ecological Applications, Global Ecology and Conservation, Forest Ecology and Management, and Fire. Their work often integrates cross-disciplinary approaches from global and planetary change, atmospheric science, plant science, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation.

Collaborations are an important part of Preisler's research. Frequent coauthors include Donald Schweizer, Ricardo Cisneros, Joseph A. E. Stewart, Phillip J. van Mantgem, and Derek J. N. Young, reflecting a network of scholars contributing to studies of fire regimes, vegetation dynamics, and atmospheric impacts on ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Probability based models for estimation of wildfire risk

    Haiganoush K. Preisler;David R. Brillinger;Robert E. Burgan;J. W. Benoit

  • Resistance of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera : Plutellidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies in the field

    A. M. Shelton;J. L. Robertson;J. D. Tang;C. Perez

  • Effects of bark beetle-caused tree mortality on wildfire

    Jeffrey A. Hicke;Jeffrey A. Hicke;Morris C. Johnson;Jane L. Hayes;Haiganoush K. Preisler

  • Concurrent sickle-cell anemia and alpha-thalassemia: effect on severity of anemia.

    Stephen H. Embury;Andree M. Dozy;Judy Miller;J. R. Davis

  • Climate change and growth scenarios for California wildfire

    A. L. Westerling;B. P. Bryant;H. K. Preisler;T. P. Holmes

  • Prescribed burning effects on soil physical properties and soil water repellency in a steep chaparral watershed, southern California, USA

    K.R. Hubbert;H.K. Preisler;P.M. Wohlgemuth;R.C. Graham

  • An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data

    David R. Brillinger;Haiganoush K. Preisler

  • Further analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data

    David R. Brillinger;Haiganoush K. Preisler

  • Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Effects of combinations of Beauveria bassiana with insecticides

    T. E. Anderson;A. E. Hajek;Donald W. Roberts;H. K. Preisler

  • DEVELOPING PROBABILISTIC MODELS TO PREDICT AMPHIBIAN SITE OCCUPANCY IN A PATCHY LANDSCAPE

    Roland A. Knapp;Kathleen R. Matthews;Haiganoush K. Preisler;Robert Jellison

  • Factors influencing fire severity under moderate burning conditions in the Klamath Mountains, northern California, USA

    Becky L. Estes;Eric E. Knapp;Carl N. Skinner;Jay D. Miller

  • Analysis of Time-Dose-Mortality Data

    Haiganoush K. Preisler;Jacqueline L. Robertson

  • Natural Variation: A Complicating Factor in Bioassays with Chemical and Microbial Pesticides

    J. L. Robertson;H. K. Preisler;S. S. Ng;Leslie A. Hickle

  • Wildfire risk estimation in the Mediterranean area

    Alan A. Ager;Haiganoush K. Preisler;Bachisio Arca;Donatella Emma Ignazia Spano;Donatella Emma Ignazia Spano

  • Fall Rate of Lodgepole Pine Killed by the Mountain Pine Beetle in Central Oregon

    Russel G. Mitchell;Haiganoush K. Preisler

  • Statistical Model for Forecasting Monthly Large Wildfire Events in Western United States

    Haiganoush K. Preisler;Anthony L. Westerling

  • Analyzing wildfire exposure and source–sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape

    Alan A. Ager;Nicole M. Vaillant;Mark A. Finney;Haiganoush K. Preisler

  • Modeling animal movements using stochastic differential equations

    Haiganoush K. Preisler;Alan A. Ager;Bruce K. Johnson;John G. Kie

  • Climate and weather influences on spatial temporal patterns of mountain pine beetle populations in Washington and Oregon

    Haiganoush K. Preisler;Jeffrey A. Hicke;Jeffrey A. Hicke;Alan A. Ager;Jane L Hayes

  • Risk assessment: a forest fire example

    David R. Brillinger;Haiganoush K. Preisler;John W. Benoit

  • Analysis of spatial patterns of lodgepole pine attacked by outbreak populations of the mountain pine beetle

    R. G. Mitchell;H. K. Preisler

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan A. Ager
Alan A. Ager US Forest Service
David R. Brillinger
David R. Brillinger University of California, Berkeley
Andrzej Bytnerowicz
Andrzej Bytnerowicz US Forest Service
Jeffrey A. Hicke
Jeffrey A. Hicke University of Idaho
Michael J. Wisdom
Michael J. Wisdom US Forest Service
John G. Kie
John G. Kie Idaho State University
Kenneth F. Raffa
Kenneth F. Raffa University of Wisconsin–Madison
Hugh D. Safford
Hugh D. Safford University of California, Davis
Roland A. Knapp
Roland A. Knapp University of California, Berkeley
Mark E. Fenn
Mark E. Fenn US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring complementary online degrees can broaden career options and enhance expertise. Public administration plays a vital role in shaping environmental policies, making online MPA degrees a strategic choice for those aiming to influence sustainable governance and resource management.

Understanding societal dynamics is also crucial in environmental work. Pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology offers insights into human behavior and social structures that impact environmental issues, such as community resilience and environmental justice.

Educators and leaders looking to advance their careers might consider doctoral studies in education focused on environmental curriculum development or leadership. Programs like EdD no dissertation options provide a flexible path for professionals who prefer applied research over traditional dissertations.

For those ready to elevate their qualifications, transitioning through EdS to EdD programs online can provide advanced leadership skills tailored to educational environments focused on environmental sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Haiganoush K. Preisler

Trending Scientists