World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 99 658 577 416 354 212 31922
Medicine 98 8984 8432 4624 4277 210 31794

Ruth H. Striegel-Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth H. Striegel-Moore between 1984 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth H. Striegel-Moore published across 38 years, from 1984 to 2021, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2005. 1 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2005. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1984 2021

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth H. Striegel-Moore: publications per year, 1984 to 2021
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 3
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 2
1995 5
1996 9
1997 5
1998 8
1999 6
2000 8
2001 17
2002 7
2003 5
2004 9
2005 22
2006 16
2007 12
2008 11
2009 11
2010 11
2011 12
2012 3
2013 14
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 217
Download as CSV

Ruth H. Striegel-Moore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth H. Striegel-Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ruth H. Striegel-Moore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth H. Striegel-Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53 99
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ruth H. Striegel-Moore is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States. Their academic work spans various dimensions within their field, although specific recent papers, co-authors, and detailed publication venues are not documented here.

Their research contributions are grounded within their primary institutional setting, suggesting a focused academic career at Wesleyan University. Details on their research topics, subfields, and fields of study are not explicitly provided, indicating the need for further exploration to clarify their scientific focus areas.

There are no listed awards, recent publications, or book contributions available for Ruth H. Striegel-Moore from the given data. This absence of detailed bibliometric or accolade information limits a more comprehensive profiling of their academic output or recognition.

Despite the limited data on specific research themes or collaborations, Ruth H. Striegel-Moore's association with an established academic institution points to active engagement in higher education and research activities. Further insights into their scientific work would require access to additional sources or databases that capture publication records and professional achievements.

Best Publications

  • Women and weight: a normative discontent.

    Judith Rodin;Lisa Silberstein;Ruth Striegel-Moore

  • Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Lisa R. Silberstein;Judith Rodin

  • Risk factors for eating disorders.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Cynthia M. Bulik

  • Behavioral and psychological implications of body dissatisfaction: Do men and women differ?

    Lisa R. Silberstein;Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Christine Timko;Judith Rodin

  • Gender difference in the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Francine Rosselli;Nancy Perrin;Lynn DeBar

  • Epidemiology and Natural Course of Eating Disorders in Young Women From Adolescence to Young Adulthood

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;John R. Seeley

  • The Embodiment of Masculinity: "Cultural, Psychological, and Behavioral Dimensions"

    Marc E. Mishkind;Judith Rodin;Lisa R. Silberstein;Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

  • A prospective study of disordered eating among college students

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Lisa R. Silberstein;Peter Frensch;Judith Rodin

  • Eating Disorders in White and Black Women

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Faith A. Dohm;Helena C. Kraemer;C. Barr Taylor

  • Epidemiology of binge eating disorder.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Debra L. Franko

  • Correlates of beverage intake in adolescent girls: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Douglas Thompson;Sandra G. Affenito;Debra L. Franko

  • Gender differences in eating disorder symptoms in young adults.

    Peter M. Lewinsohn;John R. Seeley;Kirstin C. Moerk;Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

  • Childhood overweight and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study.

    Douglas R. Thompson;Eva Obarzanek;Debra L. Franko;Bruce A. Barton

  • The social self in bulimia nervosa: public self-consciousness, social anxiety, and perceived fraudulence.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Lisa R. Silberstein;Judith Rodin

  • The relationship of breakfast and cereal consumption to nutrient intake and body mass index: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study.

    Bruce A. Barton;Alison L. Eldridge;Douglas Thompson;Sandra G. Affenito

  • One-year use and cost of inpatient and outpatient services among Female and male patients with an eating disorder: Evidence from a national database of health insurance claims

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Douglas Leslie;Douglas Leslie;Stephen A. Petrill;Vicki Garvin

  • Psychological and behavioral correlates of feeling fat in women

    Ruth Striegel-Moore;Gail McAvay;Judith Rodin

  • Impact of timing of pubertal maturation on growth in black and white female adolescents: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study.

    Frank M. Biro;Robert P. McMahon;Ruth Striegel-Moore;Patricia B. Crawford

  • Breakfast Consumption by African-American and White Adolescent Girls Correlates Positively with Calcium and Fiber Intake and Negatively with Body Mass Index

    Sandra G. Affenito;Douglas R. Thompson;Bruce A. Barton;Debra L. Franko

  • Recurrent Binge Eating in Black American Women

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore;Denise E. Wilfley;Kathleen M. Pike;Faith-Anne Dohm

  • Risk factors for eating disorders.

    Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

George B. Schreiber
George B. Schreiber Westat (United States)
Stephen R. Daniels
Stephen R. Daniels University of Colorado Denver
Bruce A. Barton
Bruce A. Barton University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University
Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis
Christopher G. Fairburn
Christopher G. Fairburn University of Oxford
Kathleen M. Pike
Kathleen M. Pike Columbia University
Judith Rodin
Judith Rodin Rockefeller Foundation
G. Terence Wilson
G. Terence Wilson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Nancy A. Perrin
Nancy A. Perrin Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology unlocks a wide array of online degree options and career pathways in the mental health and counseling fields. Many U.S. universities offer flexible online programs that prepare graduates for roles in clinical practice, school counseling, rehabilitation, and more.

When searching for the right program, value and relevance are essential factors to consider. For those in the Southeast, the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Florida is a helpful resource for choosing high-quality options. Students on the West Coast can review the most valuable counseling degrees in Los Angeles to identify top local programs.

Prospective students in the Midwest should explore the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Missouri, while those in the Northeast can benefit from the best value counseling degrees in Pennsylvania.

Graduates with psychology or counseling degrees may pursue licensure to become counselors, therapists, or clinical psychologists. Online degree programs often include practicum experiences and comprehensive curricula, ensuring students are prepared for licensure and a range of rewarding careers serving individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth H. Striegel-Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles