World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
74
Citations
18221
World Ranking
600
National Ranking
285

Silvia S. Martins publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia S. Martins sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 364 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Silvia S. Martins D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia S. Martins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Silvia S. Martins is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and public health topics, with a strong emphasis on epidemiology, substance abuse treatment, and outcomes related to opioid and cannabis use disorders.

Their main fields of study include Medicine, with subfields in Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, and Pharmacology. This interdisciplinary approach supports their research on various health and social issues.

Frequent topics in their work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Several coauthors have collaborated frequently with Martins, highlighting established research partnerships in their field. These include Deborah S. Hasin, Magdalena Cerdá, Pia M. Mauro, Katherine M. Keyes, and Mark Olfson.

Silvia S. Martins has published extensively across multiple venues, with a notable number of articles appearing in:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • American Journal of Epidemiology

Among their recent papers are:

  • US Trends in Drug Overdose Mortality Among Pregnant and Postpartum Persons, 2017-2020 (2022, JAMA)
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws (2021, JAMA Network Open)
  • Investigating the effect of national government physical distancing measures on depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic through meta-analysis and meta-regression (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • Racial/Ethnic and Geographic Trends in Combined Stimulant/Opioid Overdoses, 2007-2019 (2021, American Journal of Epidemiology)
  • Association of Medicaid Expansion With Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States (2020, JAMA Network Open)

Best Publications

  • The Burden of Mental Disorders

    William W. Eaton;Silvia S. Martins;Gerald Nestadt;O. Joseph Bienvenu

  • Association Between Recreational Marijuana Legalization in the United States and Changes in Marijuana Use and Cannabis Use Disorder From 2008 to 2016

    Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá;Christine Mauro;Ava Hamilton;Natalie S. Levy

  • ADHD in a school sample of Brazilian adolescents: a study of prevalence, comorbid conditions, and impairments.

    Luis A. Rohde;Joseph Biederman;Ellis A. Busnello;Heloisa Zimmermann

  • Trends in Marijuana Use Among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Reproductive-Aged Women, 2002-2014.

    Qiana L. Brown;Aaron L. Sarvet;Dvora Shmulewitz;Silvia S. Martins

  • Worldwide Prevalence and Trends in Unintentional Drug Overdose: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Silvia S. Martins;Laura Sampson;Magdalena Cerdá;Sandro Galea

  • Mood and anxiety disorders and their association with non-medical prescription opioid use and prescription opioid-use disorder: longitudinal evidence from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    Silvia S. Martins;Miriam C. Fenton;Katherine M. Keyes;Carlos Blanco

  • Perceived risk of regular cannabis use in the United States from 2002 to 2012: Differences by sex, age, and race/ethnicity

    Lauren R. Pacek;Pia M. Mauro;Silvia S. Martins;Silvia S. Martins

  • Changes in US Lifetime Heroin Use and Heroin Use Disorder: Prevalence From the 2001-2002 to 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Silvia S. Martins;Aaron Sarvet;Julian Santaella-Tenorio;Tulshi Saha

  • Telescoping and gender differences in alcohol dependence: new evidence from two national surveys.

    Katherine M. Keyes;Silvia S. Martins;Carlos Blanco;Deborah S. Hasin

  • Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use in Childhood and Early Adolescence Predicts Transitions to Heroin Use in Young Adulthood: A National Study

    Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá;Julián Santaella;Brandon D.L. Marshall;June H. Kim

  • Demographic trends among older cannabis users in the United States, 2006-13.

    Benjamin H. Han;Scott Sherman;Pia M. Mauro;Silvia S. Martins

  • Predictors of Transition to Heroin Use among Initially Non-Opioid Dependent Illicit Pharmaceutical Opioid Users: A Natural History Study

    Robert G. Carlson;Ramzi W. Nahhas;Silvia S. Martins;Raminta Daniulaityte

  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a Diverse Culture: Do Research and Clinical Findings Support the Notion of a Cultural Construct for the Disorder?

    Luis Augusto Rohde;Cláudia Szobot;Guilherme Polanczyk;Marcelo Schmitz

  • State-level medical marijuana laws, marijuana use and perceived availability of marijuana among the general U.S. population

    Silvia S. Martins;Christine M. Mauro;Julian Santaella-Tenorio;June H. Kim

  • Factors at play in faster progression for female pathological gamblers: An exploratory analysis

    Hermano Tavares;Silvia S. Martins;Daniela S. S. Lobo;Camila M. Silveira

  • Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review

    David S. Fink;Julia P. Schleimer;Aaron Sarvet;Kiran K. Grover

  • Pathological gambling, gender, and risk-taking behaviors.

    Silvia Saboia Martins;Hermano Tavares;Hermano Tavares;Daniela Sabbatini da Silva Lobo;Ana Maria Galetti

  • The widening gender gap in marijuana use prevalence in the U.S. during a period of economic change, 2002-2014.

    Hannah Carliner;Pia M. Mauro;Qiana L. Brown;Dvora Shmulewitz

  • Mental health service utilization for psychiatric disorders among Latinos living in the United States: the role of ethnic subgroup, ethnic identity, and language/social preferences

    Katherine M. Keyes;Katherine M. Keyes;S. S. Martins;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Carlos Blanco;Carlos Blanco

  • Urban-rural variation in the socioeconomic determinants of opioid overdose

    Veronica A. Pear;William R. Ponicki;Andrew Gaidus;Katherine M. Keyes

  • Pathways between nonmedical opioid use/dependence and psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

    Silvia S. Martins;Katherine M. Keyes;Carla L. Storr;Carla L. Storr;Hong Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

Magdalena Cerdá
Magdalena Cerdá New York University
Katherine M. Keyes
Katherine M. Keyes Columbia University
Deborah S. Hasin
Deborah S. Hasin Columbia University
Melanie M. Wall
Melanie M. Wall Columbia University
Laura Helena Andrade
Laura Helena Andrade Universidade de São Paulo
Brandon D. L. Marshall
Brandon D. L. Marshall Brown University
Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Robert G. Carlson
Robert G. Carlson Wright State University
Pamela J. Surkan
Pamela J. Surkan Johns Hopkins University
Nicholas S. Ialongo
Nicholas S. Ialongo Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career pathways. As you plan your studies, it’s essential to consider factors like tuition costs, program length, and acceptance rates.

If you’re interested in human behavior and mental health, pursuing a psychology degree cost is a key consideration. Affordable psychology programs make it easier to enter the field without overwhelming debt. For those keen on social work, you might explore msw programs with high acceptance rate. These can help students with varied backgrounds start a rewarding career in community support and advocacy.

Advanced degrees provide further specialization. For instance, an online psyd program prepares graduates for clinical roles in psychology, focusing on hands-on practice rather than research. If counseling and family therapy interest you, consider the fastest route with a mft degree—perfect for those aiming to help couples and families.

Each career path in the social sciences and humanities has unique academic requirements and outcomes. Comparing online program features and admission criteria helps you make the best choice for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Silvia S. Martins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles