World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 78 441 380 208 177 275 18434

Magdalena Cerdá publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Magdalena Cerdá between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Magdalena Cerdá published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2021. 71 of the 411 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 41 publications
1991 2025

411 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Magdalena Cerdá: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 8
2009 3
2010 6
2011 9
2012 9
2013 19
2014 13
2015 23
2016 26
2017 30
2018 22
2019 19
2020 30
2021 45
2022 34
2023 36
2024 30
2025 41
Total 411
Download as CSV

Magdalena Cerdá publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magdalena Cerdá sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 275 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 275
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Magdalena Cerdá D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magdalena Cerdá sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25 78
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Magdalena Cerdá is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work covers key topics including Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation.

Cerdá has published extensively across several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Addiction
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Epidemiology

Recent scientific contributions by Cerdá include the following papers:

  • "Association of Racial/Ethnic Segregation With Treatment Capacity for Opioid Use Disorder in Counties in the United States," 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • "Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the U.S.?: A yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019," 2022, International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "What is the prevalence of and trend in opioid use disorder in the United States from 2010 to 2019? Using multiplier approaches to estimate prevalence for an unknown population size," 2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • "The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices," 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Who stays in medication treatment for opioid use disorder? A national study of outpatient specialty treatment settings," 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Magdalena Cerdá collaborates frequently with other researchers. Notable coauthors in their work include:

  • Katherine M. Keyes
  • Sílvia S. Martins
  • Deborah S. Hasin
  • Mark Olfson
  • Brandon D. L. Marshall

Best Publications

  • Medical marijuana laws in 50 states: investigating the relationship between state legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse and dependence.

    Magdalena Cerdá;Melanie Wall;Katherine M. Keyes;Sandro Galea

  • Understanding the Rural–Urban Differences in Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use and Abuse in the United States

    Katherine M. Keyes;Magdalena Cerdá;Joanne E. Brady;Jennifer R. Havens

  • Association of State Recreational Marijuana Laws With Adolescent Marijuana Use

    Magdalena Cerdá;Melanie Wall;Tianshu Feng;Katherine M. Keyes

  • US Adult Illicit Cannabis Use, Cannabis Use Disorder, and Medical Marijuana Laws: 1991-1992 to 2012-2013

    Deborah S. Hasin;Aaron L. Sarvet;Magdalena Cerdá;Katherine M. Keyes

  • Psychiatric comorbidities in alcohol use disorder

    Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia;Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia;Katherine M Keyes;Deborah S Hasin;Magdalena Cerdá

  • Worldwide Prevalence and Trends in Unintentional Drug Overdose: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Silvia S. Martins;Laura Sampson;Magdalena Cerdá;Sandro Galea

  • Agent-Based Modeling in Public Health: Current Applications and Future Directions.

    Melissa Tracy;Magdalena Cerdá;Katherine M. Keyes

  • Medical marijuana laws and adolescent marijuana use in the USA from 1991 to 2014: results from annual, repeated cross-sectional surveys

    Deborah S. Hasin;Deborah S. Hasin;Melanie Wall;Melanie Wall;Katherine M. Keyes;Magdalena Cerdá

  • Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Predict Onset of Cardiovascular Events in Women

    Jennifer A. Sumner;Laura D. Kubzansky;Mitchell S.V. Elkind;Andrea L. Roberts

  • Adolescent marijuana use from 2002 to 2008: higher in states with medical marijuana laws, cause still unclear.

    Melanie M. Wall;Ernest Poh;Magdalena Cerdá;Katherine M. Keyes

  • Association of Racial/Ethnic Segregation With Treatment Capacity for Opioid Use Disorder in Counties in the United States.

    William C. Goedel;Aaron Shapiro;Magdalena Cerdá;Jennifer W. Tsai

  • What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries?

    Julian Santaella-Tenorio;Magdalena Cerdá;Andrés Villaveces;Sandro Galea

  • Nonmedical Prescription Opioid Use in Childhood and Early Adolescence Predicts Transitions to Heroin Use in Young Adulthood: A National Study

    Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá;Julián Santaella;Brandon D.L. Marshall;June H. Kim

  • Neighborhood Characteristics and Disability in Older Adults

    John R. Beard;John R. Beard;John R. Beard;Shannon Blaney;Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá;Victoria Frye

  • Association of Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing of Opioid Products With Mortality From Opioid-Related Overdoses.

    Scott E. Hadland;Scott E. Hadland;Ariadne Rivera-Aguirre;Ariadne Rivera-Aguirre;Brandon D. L. Marshall;Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá

  • Effects of Neighborhood Resources on Aggressive and Delinquent Behaviors Among Urban Youths

    Beth E. Molnar;Magdalena Cerda;Andrea L. Roberts;Stephen L. Buka

  • State-level medical marijuana laws, marijuana use and perceived availability of marijuana among the general U.S. population

    Silvia S. Martins;Christine M. Mauro;Julian Santaella-Tenorio;June H. Kim

  • Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review

    David S. Fink;Julia P. Schleimer;Aaron Sarvet;Kiran K. Grover

  • Reducing Violence by Transforming Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment in Medellín, Colombia

    Magdalena Cerdá;Jeffrey D. Morenoff;Ben B. Hansen;Kimberly J. Tessari Hicks

  • UnderstandingtheRural-UrbanDifferencesinNonmedical PrescriptionOpioidUseandAbuseintheUnitedStates

    Katherine M. Keyes;Magdalena Cerdá;Joanne E. Brady;Jennifer R. Havens

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Katherine M. Keyes
Katherine M. Keyes Columbia University
Silvia S. Martins
Silvia S. Martins Columbia University
Deborah S. Hasin
Deborah S. Hasin Columbia University
Garen J. Wintemute
Garen J. Wintemute University of California, Davis
Brandon D. L. Marshall
Brandon D. L. Marshall Brown University
Melanie M. Wall
Melanie M. Wall Columbia University
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Danielle C. Ompad
Danielle C. Ompad New York University
David Vlahov
David Vlahov Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities unlocks diverse online degree options and flexible career pathways. For those passionate about supporting individuals and communities, cheapest online msw programs make a Master of Social Work both accessible and affordable. These programs combine theory and practical experience, preparing graduates for roles in counseling, advocacy, and social services.

Specializing further, aspiring behavior analysts can consider accredited bcba programs that lead to Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification. These pathways are ideal for those interested in making a difference in educational or healthcare settings.

For those seeking faster routes to the workforce, 1 year msw programs deliver rigorous preparation on a condensed timeline, allowing rapid transition into social work careers. Likewise, accelerated psychology degree programs enable students to earn credentials quickly and start contributing in counseling, research, or organizational settings.

With so many affordable and streamlined options, studying social sciences and humanities online in the USA can open doors to meaningful and in-demand professions.

Best Scientists Citing Magdalena Cerdá

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles