World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2612 2386 1270 1147 180 9350

Danielle C. Ompad publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danielle C. Ompad between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danielle C. Ompad published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2007. 14 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2007. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danielle C. Ompad: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 6
2004 5
2005 14
2006 7
2007 18
2008 13
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 3
2013 7
2014 12
2015 17
2016 8
2017 9
2018 7
2019 12
2020 8
2021 14
2022 10
2023 5
2024 7
2025 7
Total 209
Download as CSV

Danielle C. Ompad publications per year - data summary

  • Danielle C. Ompad, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from New York University, has 209 publications recorded across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2001 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2001, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.4 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 43 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2001-2009: 70 publications (7.8 per year); 2010-2018: 76 publications (8.4 per year); 2019-2025: 63 publications (9.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Danielle C. Ompad publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle C. Ompad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 180
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Danielle C. Ompad publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Danielle C. Ompad, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from New York University, records 180 publications - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Danielle C. Ompad, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Danielle C. Ompad ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Danielle C. Ompad D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle C. Ompad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Danielle C. Ompad D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Danielle C. Ompad, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from New York University, records 51 D-Index - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Danielle C. Ompad, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Danielle C. Ompad ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Danielle C. Ompad is affiliated with New York University in the United States and is primarily engaged in research within the field of Medicine. Their work spans various subfields, including Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, and Pharmacology.

Their research focuses on several main topics, such as HIV, Drug Use, and Sexual Risk; Opioid Use Disorder Treatment; Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes; HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions; Cervical Cancer and HPV Research; Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research; and Homelessness and Social Issues.

Recent publications by Danielle C. Ompad include:

  • "They look at us like junkies": influences of drug use stigma on the healthcare engagement of people who inject drugs in New York City, 2020, Harm Reduction Journal
  • The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Drug Use Behaviors, Fentanyl Exposure, and Harm Reduction Service Support among People Who Use Drugs in Rural Settings, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • PrEP Care Continuum Engagement Among Persons Who Inject Drugs: Rural and Urban Differences in Stigma and Social Infrastructure, 2021, AIDS and Behavior
  • The Opioid/Overdose Crisis as a Dialectics of Pain, Despair, and One-Sided Struggle, 2020, Frontiers in Public Health
  • Structural and community changes during COVID-19 and their effects on overdose precursors among rural people who use drugs: a mixed-methods analysis, 2022, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Frequent co-authors in their body of work are:

  • Suzan M. Walters
  • John A. Schneider
  • Samuel R. Friedman
  • Emily Goldmann
  • Brandon Muncan

Danielle C. Ompad commonly publishes in venues such as:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Urban Health
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • Substance Use & Misuse

Best Publications

  • Urban as a determinant of health

    David Vlahov;Nicholas Freudenberg;Fernando Proietti;Danielle C. Ompad

  • Hidden cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings

    Danielle Ompad

  • Prospective Evaluation of Community‐Acquired Acute‐Phase Hepatitis C Virus Infection

    Andrea L. Cox;Dale M. Netski;Timothy Mosbruger;Susan G. Sherman

  • Neighborhood Characteristics and Disability in Older Adults

    John R. Beard;John R. Beard;John R. Beard;Shannon Blaney;Magdalena Cerdá;Magdalena Cerdá;Victoria Frye

  • Access to and use of health services among undocumented Mexican immigrants in a US urban area

    Arijit Nandi;Sandro Galea;Gerald Lopez;Vijay Nandi

  • Protection of racial/ethnic minority populations during an influenza pandemic.

    Sonja S. Hutchins;Kevin Fiscella;Robert S. Levine;Danielle C. Ompad

  • Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in a New Orleans workforce following Hurricane Katrina

    Karen B. Desalvo;Amanda D. Hyre;Danielle C. Ompad;Andreas Menke

  • Identifying injection drug users at risk of nonfatal overdose.

    Phillip O. Coffin;Melissa Tracy;Angela Bucciarelli;Danielle Ompad

  • Childhood Sexual Abuse and Age at Initiation of Injection Drug Use

    Danielle C. Ompad;Robin M Ikeda;Nina Shah;Crystal M. Fuller;Crystal M. Fuller

  • High-risk behaviors associated with transition from illicit non-injection to injection drug use among adolescent and young adult drug users: a case-control study

    Crystal M. Fuller;David Vlahov;David Vlahov;David Vlahov;Danielle C. Ompad;Nina Shah

  • Defining Neighborhood Boundaries for Urban Health Research

    Linda Weiss;Danielle Ompad;Sandro Galea;Sandro Galea;David Vlahov

  • Social Determinants of the Health of Urban Populations: Methodologic Considerations

    Danielle C. Ompad;Sandro Galea;Sandro Galea;Waleska T. Caiaffa;David Vlahov

  • Correlates of intentions to use cannabis among US high school seniors in the case of cannabis legalization

    Joseph J. Palamar;Danielle C. Ompad;Eva Petkova;Eva Petkova

  • Effects of Race, Neighborhood, and Social Network on Age at Initiation of Injection Drug Use

    Crystal M. Fuller;Luisa N. Borrell;Carl A. Latkin;Sandro Galea

  • The impact of the Good Behavior Game, a universal classroom-based preventive intervention in first and second grades, on high-risk sexual behaviors and drug abuse and dependence disorders into young adulthood

    Sheppard G. Kellam;Weixu Wang;Amelia C. L. Mackenzie;C. Hendricks Brown

  • Social circumstances of initiation of injection drug use and early shooting gallery attendance: implications for HIV intervention among adolescent and young adult injection drug users.

    Crystal M. Fuller;David Vlahov;David Vlahov;Carl A. Latkin;Danielle C. Ompad

  • Powder cocaine and crack use in the United States: an examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use.

    Joseph J. Palamar;Shelby Davies;Danielle C. Ompad;Charles M. Cleland

  • Circumstances of witnessed drug overdose in New York City: implications for intervention

    Melissa Tracy;Tinka Markham Piper;Danielle C. Ompad;Angela Bucciarelli

  • Self-reported use of novel psychoactive substances in a US nationally representative survey: Prevalence, correlates, and a call for new survey methods to prevent underreporting

    Joseph J. Palamar;Silvia S. Martins;Mark K. Su;Danielle C. Ompad

  • Factors associated with adolescent initiation of injection drug use

    Crystal M. Fuller;David Vlahov;Amelia M. Arria;Danielle C. Ompad

Frequent Co-Authors

David Vlahov
David Vlahov Yale University
Sandro Galea
Sandro Galea Washington University in St. Louis
Joseph J. Palamar
Joseph J. Palamar New York University
Magdalena Cerdá
Magdalena Cerdá New York University
Beryl A. Koblin
Beryl A. Koblin New York Blood Center
Perry N. Halkitis
Perry N. Halkitis Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Steffanie A. Strathdee
Steffanie A. Strathdee University of California, San Diego
Donald R. Hoover
Donald R. Hoover Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Carl A. Latkin
Carl A. Latkin Johns Hopkins University
Andrew Rundle
Andrew Rundle Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse career opportunities, especially with the growing availability of online degrees in the USA. Many students are now opting for online masters programs which offer flexibility and allow for career advancement without disrupting work or personal commitments. These programs often focus on critical thinking, communication, and research skills that are highly valued in today’s job market.

For adults looking to complete their undergraduate studies quickly, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults can be a practical solution. These pathways are designed to fit busy schedules and often recognize prior learning or work experience.

Social work remains a popular field among Humanities graduates. Pursuing licensure is more accessible with cheap online msw programs, lowering both financial and geographic barriers for motivated professionals. For those interested in behavioral analysis, there are also bcba certification programs online that prepare graduates for specialized practice, opening roles in education, healthcare, or community services.

Best Scientists Citing Danielle C. Ompad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles