World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Denmark
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
23715
World Ranking
3735
National Ranking
13

Ole Winther publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Winther sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ole Winther D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Winther sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Ole Winther is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including molecular biology, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, materials chemistry, and genetics.

The scientist's research encompasses several key topics:

  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Topic Modeling
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics

Ole Winther has published in a variety of venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Bioinformatics

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ole Winther include:

  • Valentin Liévin
  • Frederik Otzen Bagger
  • Felix Teufel
  • Henrik Nielsen
  • Christoffer Hother

Among recent publications, some notable works are:

  • "SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models," 2022, Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • "DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks," 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "DeepLoc 2.0: multi-label subcellular localization prediction using protein language models," 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "NetSurfP-3.0: accurate and fast prediction of protein structural features by protein language models and deep learning," 2022, Nucleic Acids Research

Ole Winther's research integrates advanced computational methods such as deep learning and neural networks with biological data, aiming to enhance understanding and predictive capabilities in protein biology and genomics. Their work on protein language models contributes to analyses of signal peptides, transmembrane proteins, and subcellular localization, addressing challenges in protein structure and dynamics.

The scientist's approach demonstrates interdisciplinary application of machine learning techniques to problems in bioinformatics and materials science, reflecting their engagement with diverse scientific domains.

Best Publications

  • SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks

    Jose Juan Almagro Armenteros;Konstantinos D. Tsirigos;Casper Kaae Sønderby;Thomas Nordahl Petersen

  • Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric

    Anders Boesen Lindbo Larsen;Søren Kaae Sønderby;Hugo Larochelle;Ole Winther

  • DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning.

    Jose Juan Almagro Armenteros;Jose Juan Almagro Armenteros;Casper Kaae Sønderby;Søren Kaae Sønderby;Henrik Nielsen

  • Detecting sequence signals in targeting peptides using deep learning.

    Jose Juan Almagro Armenteros;Marco Salvatore;Marco Salvatore;Olof Emanuelsson;Olof Emanuelsson;Ole Winther;Ole Winther;Ole Winther

  • JASPAR, the open access database of transcription factor-binding profiles: new content and tools in the 2008 update

    Jan Christian Bryne;Eivind Valen;Man-Hung Eric Tang;Troels Torben Marstrand

  • Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders

    Jakob Nybo Nissen;Jakob Nybo Nissen;Joachim Johansen;Rosa Lundbye Allesøe;Casper Kaae Sønderby

  • NetSurfP-2.0: Improved prediction of protein structural features by integrated deep learning

    Michael Schantz Klausen;Martin Closter Jespersen;Henrik Nielsen;Kamilla Kjærgaard Jensen

  • Ladder Variational Autoencoders

    Casper Kaae Sønderby;Tapani Raiko;Lars Maaløe;Søren Kaae Sønderby

  • The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line

    Harukazu Suzuki;Alistair R.R. Forrest;Erik Van Nimwegen;Carsten O. Daub

  • Auxiliary deep generative models

    Lars Maaløe;Casper Kaae Sønderby;Søren Kaae Sønderby;Ole Winther

  • BloodSpot: a database of gene expression profiles and transcriptional programs for healthy and malignant haematopoiesis.

    Frederik Otzen Bagger;Damir Sasivarevic;Sina Hadi Sohi;Linea Gøricke Laursen

  • Gaussian Processes for Classification: Mean-Field Algorithms

    Manfred Opper;Ole Winther

  • Sequential Neural Models with Stochastic Layers

    Marco Fraccaro;Søren Kaae Sønderby;Ulrich Paquet;Ole Winther

  • scVAE: variational auto-encoders for single-cell gene expression data.

    Christopher Heje Grønbech;Christopher Heje Grønbech;Christopher Heje Grønbech;Maximillian Fornitz Vording;Pascal Timshel;Casper Kaae Sønderby

  • Bayesian Non-negative Matrix Factorization

    Mikkel N. Schmidt;Ole Winther;Lars Kai Hansen

  • A Disentangled Recognition and Nonlinear Dynamics Model for Unsupervised Learning

    Marco Fraccaro;Simon Due Kamronn;Ulrich Paquet;Ole Winther

  • Expectation Consistent Approximate Inference

    Manfred Opper;Ole Winther

  • NetTCR-2.0 enables accurate prediction of TCR-peptide binding by using paired TCRα and β sequence data.

    Alessandro Montemurro;Viktoria Schuster;Helle Rus Povlsen;Amalie Kai Bentzen

  • Mean-field approaches to independent component analysis

    Pedro A. D. F. R. Højen-Sørensen;Ole Winther;Lars Kai Hansen

  • Convolutional LSTM Networks for Subcellular Localization of Proteins

    SØren Kaae SØnderby;Casper Kaae SØnderby;Henrik Nielsen;Ole Winther

  • Genome-wide detection and analysis of hippocampus core promoters using DeepCAGE

    Eivind Valen;Giovanni Pascarella;Alistair Morgan Chalk;Norihiro Maeda

  • BIVA: A Very Deep Hierarchy of Latent Variables for Generative Modeling

    Lars Maaløe;Marco Fraccaro;Valentin Liévin;Ole Winther

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Opper
Manfred Opper Technical University of Berlin
Lars Kai Hansen
Lars Kai Hansen Technical University of Denmark
Bernard Henri Fleury
Bernard Henri Fleury Aalborg University
Anders Krogh
Anders Krogh University of Copenhagen
Bo T. Porse
Bo T. Porse University of Copenhagen
Lars Vedel Kessing
Lars Vedel Kessing University of Copenhagen
Jakob E. Bardram
Jakob E. Bardram Technical University of Denmark
Finn Cilius Nielsen
Finn Cilius Nielsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Albin Sandelin
Albin Sandelin University of Copenhagen
Vladimir Brusic
Vladimir Brusic University of Nottingham Ningbo China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science opens up a range of flexible learning options that can lead to rewarding tech careers. Many students consider programs such as the best online physics degree for a strong foundation in analytical skills and problem-solving, both of which are highly valued in computer science fields.

For those interested in the rapidly growing field of data analysis and machine learning, accredited data science programs are widely available online. These programs often focus on practical skills for careers in technology, finance, healthcare, and more.

If your interests lean towards hardware, systems, or network infrastructure, pursuing an electrical engineering degree online admissions option can be an excellent pathway. This allows you to study advanced topics such as embedded systems and telecommunications from anywhere.

Finally, if you’re looking for a quicker entry into the technology workforce, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can boost your resume and provide industry-aligned skills in a short time—enhancing your job prospects alongside a computer science degree.

Best Scientists Citing Ole Winther

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles