World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 47 15774 14232 1 1 145 6762
Engineering and Technology 46 5282 5089 2 2 142 6482

Mark Daniel G. de Luna publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Daniel G. de Luna between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Daniel G. de Luna published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 15 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
2009 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Daniel G. de Luna: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 0
2011 1
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 5
2016 9
2017 23
2018 19
2019 16
2020 20
2021 28
2022 14
2023 5
2024 7
2025 8
Total 167
Download as CSV

Mark Daniel G. de Luna publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel G. de Luna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372 142
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Daniel G. de Luna D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Daniel G. de Luna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301 46
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Daniel G. de Luna is affiliated with the University of the Philippines Diliman in the Philippines. Their research spans primarily the domains of engineering and environmental science, with significant contributions to biomedical engineering, water science and technology, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, mechanical engineering, and materials chemistry.

Their scholarly work focuses on core topics including adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal, biodiesel production and applications, thermochemical biomass conversion processes, biofuel production and bioconversion, algal biology and biofuel production, catalysis and hydrodesulfurization studies, and lignin and wood chemistry.

Mark Daniel G. de Luna has authored several papers published in notable journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Sustainable biofuel and bioenergy production from biomass waste residues using microwave-assisted heating: A comprehensive review" (2020), Chemical Engineering Journal
  • "A comprehensive review of hydrogen production from methanol thermochemical conversion for sustainability" (2020), Energy
  • "Synergistic co-pyrolysıs of polyolefin plastics with wood and agricultural wastes for biofuel production" (2020), Applied Energy
  • "Visible-light photocatalytic diclofenac removal by tunable vanadium pentoxide/boron-doped graphitic carbon nitride composite" (2020), Chemical Engineering Journal
  • "Degradation of tetracycline antibiotics by Fe2+-catalyzed percarbonate oxidation" (2021), The Science of The Total Environment

Their work frequently appears in these publication venues:

  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Separation and Purification Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Chemosphere
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Collaboration is a significant component of their research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca
  • Nurak Grisdanurak
  • Sergi Garcia-Segura
  • Carl Francis Z. Lacson
  • Wei-Hsin Chen

Best Publications

  • Sustainable biofuel and bioenergy production from biomass waste residues using microwave-assisted heating: A comprehensive review

    Arjay A. Arpia;Arjay A. Arpia;Wei Hsin Chen;Wei Hsin Chen;Wei Hsin Chen;Su Shiung Lam;Su Shiung Lam;Patrick Rousset

  • Adsorption of Eriochrome Black T (EBT) dye using activated carbon prepared from waste rice hulls—Optimization, isotherm and kinetic studies

    Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Edgar D. Flores;Divine Angela D. Genuino;Cybelle M. Futalan

  • A comprehensive review of hydrogen production from methanol thermochemical conversion for sustainability

    Gabriel Garcia;Gabriel Garcia;Emmanuel Arriola;Emmanuel Arriola;Wei Hsin Chen;Wei Hsin Chen;Wei Hsin Chen;Mark Daniel De Luna

  • Evaluation of the effectiveness and mechanisms of acetaminophen and methylene blue dye adsorption on activated biochar derived from municipal solid wastes.

    Divine Angela G. Sumalinog;Divine Angela G. Sumalinog;Sergio C. Capareda;Mark Daniel G. de Luna

  • Acetaminophen degradation by electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton using a double cathode electrochemical cell

    Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Mersabel L. Veciana;Chia-Chi Su;Ming-Chun Lu

  • Highly fluorescent carbon dots from enokitake mushroom as multi-faceted optical nanomaterials for Cr6+ and VOC detection and imaging applications

    Melvin R. Pacquiao;Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Nichaphat Thongsai;Sumana Kladsomboon

  • Recovery of phosphorus from synthetic wastewaters by struvite crystallization in a fluidized-bed reactor: Effects of pH, phosphate concentration and coexisting ions

    Yu Jen Shih;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca;Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Yao Hui Huang

  • Bio-oil production from dry sewage sludge by fast pyrolysis in an electrically-heated fluidized bed reactor

    Renato O. Arazo;Renato O. Arazo;Renato O. Arazo;Divine Angela D. Genuino;Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Sergio C. Capareda

  • Adsorption of Methylene Blue dye and Cu(II) ions on EDTA-modified bentonite: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies

    Maria Leah Flor A. De Castro;Maria Leah Flor A. De Castro;Melody Love B. Abad;Divine Angela G. Sumalinog;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca

  • Removal of sodium diclofenac from aqueous solution by adsorbents derived from cocoa pod husks

    Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Murniati;Wawan Budianta;Kim Katrina P. Rivera

  • Synergistic co-pyrolysıs of polyolefin plastics with wood and agricultural wastes for biofuel production

    John Nikko V. Salvilla;Bjorn Ivan G. Ofrasio;Analiza P. Rollon;Ferdinand G. Manegdeg;Ferdinand G. Manegdeg

  • Applicability of the electrocoagulation process in treating real municipal wastewater containing pharmaceutical active compounds

    Benny Marie B. Ensano;Laura Borea;Vincenzo Naddeo;Vincenzo Belgiorno

  • Ionic liquid dissolution utilized for biomass conversion into biofuels, value-added chemicals and advanced materials: A comprehensive review

    Unknown

  • Control of emerging contaminants by the combination of electrochemical processes and membrane bioreactors

    Benny Marie B. Ensano;Laura Borea;Vincenzo Naddeo;Mark Daniel G. de Luna

  • Combination of Electrochemical Processes with Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment and Fouling Control: A Review

    Benny M. B. Ensano;Laura Borea;Vincenzo Naddeo;Vincenzo Belgiorno

  • Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorbents synthesized from groundwater treatment residuals

    Chi-Chuan Kan;Aldwin H. Ibe;Kim Katrina P. Rivera;Renato O. Arazo;Renato O. Arazo

  • Removal of Pharmaceuticals from Wastewater by Intermittent Electrocoagulation

    Benny Marie B. Ensano;Laura Borea;Vincenzo Naddeo;Vincenzo Belgiorno

  • Kinetics of acetaminophen degradation by Fenton oxidation in a fluidized-bed reactor.

    Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Rowena M. Briones;Chia-Chi Su;Ming-Chun Lu

  • Visible-light photocatalytic diclofenac removal by tunable vanadium pentoxide/boron-doped graphitic carbon nitride composite

    April N. Oliveros;Jose Antonio I. Pimentel;Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Sergi Garcia-Segura

  • Degradation of tetracycline antibiotics by Fe2+-catalyzed percarbonate oxidation

    Jose Antonio I. Pimentel;Cheng Di Dong;Sergi Garcia-Segura;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca

  • Adsorptive removal of dye in wastewater by metal ferrite-enabled graphene oxide nanocomposites

    Allen Rhay B. Bayantong;Yu-Jen Shih;Dennis C. Ong;Ralf Ruffel M. Abarca

  • Degradations of acetaminophen via a K2S2O8-doped TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light irradiation.

    Justin Chun-Te Lin;Mark Daniel G. de Luna;Graziel L. Aranzamendez;Ming-Chun Lu

Frequent Co-Authors

Ming-Chun Lu
Ming-Chun Lu National Chung Hsing University
Wei-Hsin Chen
Wei-Hsin Chen National Cheng Kung University
Sergi Garcia-Segura
Sergi Garcia-Segura Arizona State University
Vincenzo Belgiorno
Vincenzo Belgiorno University of Salerno
Ruey-an Doong
Ruey-an Doong National Tsing Hua University
Yao Hui Huang
Yao Hui Huang National Cheng Kung University
Shadi W. Hasan
Shadi W. Hasan Khalifa University
Su Shiung Lam
Su Shiung Lam Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Vincenzo Naddeo
Vincenzo Naddeo University of Salerno
Chin-Pao Huang
Chin-Pao Huang University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in Engineering and Technology opens doors to various in-demand fields. Many universities in the USA now offer fully online degrees designed for flexible learning and career advancement.

Those interested in user experience and interface design can consider a ux design degree online, which blends creative and technical skills for digital product development. For students drawn to organizing and leading teams, pursuing a project management degree provides a strong foundation to manage engineering and technology projects efficiently.

The rise of digital currencies and financial technology has created demand for professionals skilled in blockchain and crypto applications. Universities now offer programs such as a crypto degree, which covers blockchain principles, smart contracts, and fintech innovation.

Additionally, technology is transforming the sports industry. If you are passionate about sports and technology, consider a sports management online degree to build expertise in sports analytics, event management, and digital marketing. These diverse pathways enable students to tailor their learning and prepare for exciting, technology-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Daniel G. de Luna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles