World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 73 4971 4517 43 42 330 18774

Kun-Yi Andrew Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kun-Yi Andrew Lin between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kun-Yi Andrew Lin published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 31.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 96 publications in 2022. 44 of the 509 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 96. Peak 96 publications in 2022. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 82 publications 2022: 96 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

509 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kun-Yi Andrew Lin: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 6
2013 2
2014 4
2015 22
2016 17
2017 27
2018 23
2019 27
2020 42
2021 82
2022 96
2023 63
2024 52
2025 43
2026 1
Total 509
Download as CSV

Kun-Yi Andrew Lin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kun-Yi Andrew Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 330 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643 330
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Kun-Yi Andrew Lin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kun-Yi Andrew Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 73
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kun-Yi Andrew Lin is affiliated with National Chung Hsing University in Taiwan and has contributed extensively to research in environmental science and engineering. Their work spans multiple interdisciplinary fields and focuses particularly on advanced photocatalysis techniques and water treatment processes.

The scientist's publication record includes significant contributions to the treatment of industrial wastewaters and biomass conversion, showing an emphasis on sustainable environmental technologies and catalytic processes.

Recent papers authored by the researcher include the following:

  • A review of the recent advances on the treatment of industrial wastewaters by Sulfate Radical-based Advanced Oxidation Processes (SR-AOPs), 2020, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Pyrolysis of lignocellulosic, algal, plastic, and other biomass wastes for biofuel production and circular bioeconomy: A review of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) approach, 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • A comprehensive review of thermoelectric generation optimization by statistical approach: Taguchi method, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and response surface methodology (RSM), 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • Insights into the synergistic role of photocatalytic activation of peroxymonosulfate by UVA-LED irradiation over CoFe2O4-rGO nanocomposite towards effective Bisphenol A degradation: Performance, mineralization, and activation mechanism, 2022, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production

Their frequent co-authors include Eilhann E. Kwon, Jechan Lee, Xuan-Thanh Bui, Young-Kwon Park, and Yiu Fai Tsang, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts in environmental and materials science research.

Publication venues commonly featuring their work are:

  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Separation and Purification Technology
  • Chemosphere
  • Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
  • Environmental Research

Kun-Yi Andrew Lin's main fields of study are Environmental Science and Engineering, with substantial research outputs highlighting the overlap between these disciplines.

The subfields in which they have published notably include:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Organic Chemistry

The core topics of Lin's research work emphasize:

  • Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment
  • Environmental Remediation with Nanomaterials
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Nanomaterials for Catalytic Reactions
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

Best Publications

  • Ultra-high adsorption capacity of zeolitic imidazole framework-67 (ZIF-67) for removal of malachite green from water

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Hsuan-Ang Chang

  • Adsorption of fluoride to UiO-66-NH2 in water: Stability, kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Yu-Ting Liu;Shen-Yi Chen

  • Zeolitic Imidazole Framework-67 (ZIF-67) as a heterogeneous catalyst to activate peroxymonosulfate for degradation of Rhodamine B in water

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Hsuan-Ang Chang

  • Magnetic cobalt–graphene nanocomposite derived from self-assembly of MOFs with graphene oxide as an activator for peroxymonosulfate

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Fu-Kong Hsu;Wei-Der Lee

  • Degradation of Bisphenol A using peroxymonosulfate activated by one-step prepared sulfur-doped carbon nitride as a metal-free heterogeneous catalyst

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Zhi-Yu Zhang

  • Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects

    Manish Kumar;Manish Kumar;Rashmi Rathour;Rashmi Singh;Yuqing Sun

  • Iron-based metal organic framework, MIL-88A, as a heterogeneous persulfate catalyst for decolorization of Rhodamine B in water

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Hsuan-Ang Chang;Chung-Jun Hsu

  • One-step synthesis of novel Fe3C@nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes/graphene nanosheets for catalytic degradation of Bisphenol A in the presence of peroxymonosulfate

    Wenjie Ma;Na Wang;Yunchen Du;Tianze Tong

  • Zirconium-based metal organic frameworks: Highly selective adsorbents for removal of phosphate from water and urine

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Shen-Yi Chen;Andrew P. Jochems

  • Efficient treatment for landfill leachate through sequential electrocoagulation, electrooxidation and PMS/UV/CuFe2O4 process

    Farshid Ghanbari;Junxue Wu;Masoumeh Khatebasreh;Dahu Ding

  • Ruthenium supported on ZIF-67 as an enhanced catalyst for hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of sodium borohydride

    Duong Dinh Tuan;Kun-Yi Andrew Lin

  • Self-assembled magnetic graphene supported ZIF-67 as a recoverable and efficient adsorbent for benzotriazole

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Wei-Der Lee

  • LaMO3 perovskites (M=Co, Cu, Fe and Ni) as heterogeneous catalysts for activating peroxymonosulfate in water

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Yu-Chien Chen;Yi-Feng Lin

  • Copper-based metal organic framework (MOF), HKUST-1, as an efficient adsorbent to remove p-nitrophenol from water

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Yu-Tsung Hsieh

  • The valorization of food waste via pyrolysis

    Soosan Kim;Younghyun Lee;Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Eunmi Hong

  • Multi-heteroatom-doped carbocatalyst as peroxymonosulfate and peroxydisulfate activator for water purification: A critical review.

    Unknown

  • Nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur tri-doped hollow carbon shells derived from ZIF-67@poly (cyclotriphosphazene-co-4, 4′-sulfonyldiphenol) as a robust catalyst of peroxymonosulfate activation for degradation of bisphenol A

    Wenjie Ma;Na Wang;Tianze Tong;Leijiang Zhang

  • Metal-organic frameworks for pesticidal persistent organic pollutants detection and adsorption - A mini review.

    Michal Wagner;Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Wen-Da Oh;Grzegorz Lisak

  • Insights into paracetamol degradation in aqueous solutions by ultrasound-assisted heterogeneous electro-Fenton process: Key operating parameters, mineralization and toxicity assessment

    Farshid Ghanbari;Aydin Hassani;Stanisław Wacławek;Zhaohui Wang;Zhaohui Wang

  • Effects of bonding types and functional groups on CO2 capture using novel multiphase systems of liquid-like nanoparticle organic hybrid materials

    Kun-Yi Andrew Lin;Ah-Hyung Alissa Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Eilhann E. Kwon
Eilhann E. Kwon Hanyang University
Jechan Lee
Jechan Lee Sungkyunkwan University
Farshid Ghanbari
Farshid Ghanbari Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Grzegorz Lisak
Grzegorz Lisak Nanyang Technological University
Young-Kwon Park
Young-Kwon Park University of Seoul
Yunchen Du
Yunchen Du Harbin Institute of Technology
Yiu Fai Tsang
Yiu Fai Tsang Education University of Hong Kong
Camille Petit
Camille Petit Imperial College London
Ah-Hyung Alissa Park
Ah-Hyung Alissa Park Columbia University
Xuan-Thanh Bui
Xuan-Thanh Bui Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry in the USA, exploring related fields such as forensic science and criminal justice can open diverse career opportunities. Online programs like the online forensic science degree offer affordable and flexible pathways for gaining interdisciplinary skills. These degrees combine chemistry knowledge with applied investigative techniques, making them valuable in legal and scientific contexts.

Graduate students may also consider specializing further with forensic psychology graduate programs online, which bridge the gap between chemical analysis and behavioral science. These programs prepare graduates for careers involving the psychological aspects of criminal investigations, complementing traditional chemistry backgrounds.

When assessing career options, understanding careers in forensic science highlights roles that require strong chemistry foundations, such as toxicologists, crime lab analysts, and forensic chemists. These professions are critical in solving crimes and require specialized education and training.

Finally, it’s important to consider the financial commitment involved. The cost of criminal justice degree programs varies widely, so prospective students should compare tuition and fees carefully before enrolling. Balancing affordability with program quality ensures the best return on investment in related online chemistry and forensic science education.

Best Scientists Citing Kun-Yi Andrew Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles