World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4329
World Ranking
7196
National Ranking
2424

Amy Wolf publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Wolf sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 79 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Amy Wolf D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Wolf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy Wolf is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their work focuses extensively on topics related to ecology and vegetation dynamics, plant and animal studies, forest ecology and management, species distribution and climate change, ecosystem dynamics and resilience, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, as well as insect and pesticide research.

Frequent co-authors associated with Amy Wolf include Robert W. Howe, Stuart J. Davies, Norman A. Bourg, I-Fang Sun, and Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira.

Amy Wolf has contributed to several publication venues, with a notable presence in Nature, Ecology Letters, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), New Phytologist, and Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Amy Wolf are:

  • Distribution of biomass dynamics in relation to tree size in forests across the world, 2022, New Phytologist
  • Consequences of spatial patterns for coexistence in species-rich plant communities, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Mycorrhizal feedbacks influence global forest structure and diversity, 2023, Communications Biology
  • Latitudinal patterns in stabilizing density dependence of forest communities, 2024, Nature
  • allodb: An R package for biomass estimation at globally distributed extratropical forest plots, 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Best Publications

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Global importance of large‐diameter trees

    James A. Lutz;Tucker J. Furniss;Daniel J. Johnson;Stuart J. Davies

  • Scale-dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests

    Ryan A. Chisholm;Helene C. Muller-Landau;Kassim Abdul Rahman;Daniel P. Bebber

  • Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale.

    Joseph A. LaManna;Scott A. Mangan;Alfonso Alonso;Norman A. Bourg;Norman A. Bourg

  • Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities

    Nathan G. Swenson;David L. Erickson;Xiangcheng Mi;Norman Alan Bourg

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks

    M. Réjou-Méchain;Helene C. Muller-Landau;Matteo Detto;S. C. Thomas

  • Forested Landscapes Promote Richness and Abundance of Native Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Wisconsin Apple Orchards

    J. C. Watson;A. T. Wolf;J. S. Ascher

  • Effects of Habitat Size and Patch Isolation on Reproductive Success of the Serpentine Morning Glory

    Amy T. Wolf;Susan P. Harrison

  • Spatial patterns of tree species richness in two temperate forests

    Xugao Wang;Thorsten Wiegand;Amy Wolf;Robert Howe

  • Conspecific negative density-dependent mortality and the structure of temperate forests

    Daniel J. Johnson;Norman Alan Bourg;Robert Howe;William J. McShea

  • Impacts of the Introduced Round Goby (Apollonia melanostoma) on Dreissenids (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis) and on Macroinvertebrate Community between 2003 and 2006 in the Littoral Zone of Green Bay, Lake Michigan

    Amanda M. Lederer;John Janssen;Tara Reed;Amy Wolf

  • Comparative evolutionary diversity and phylogenetic structure across multiple forest dynamics plots: a mega-phylogeny approach

    David L. Erickson;Frank A. Jones;Frank A. Jones;Nathan G. Swenson;Nancai Pei

  • Genetic diversity and population structure of the serpentine endemic Calystegia collina (Convolvulaceae) in northern California.

    Amy T. Wolf;Robert W. Howe;James L. Hamrick

  • Effects of Wind Turbines on Birds and Bats in Northeastern Wisconsin

    Robert W. Howe;William Evans;Amy T. Wolf

  • Conservation of endemic plants in serpentine landscapes

    Amy Wolf

  • Distribution of biomass dynamics in relation to tree size in forests across the world.

    Unknown

  • Phylogenetic and functional diversity area relationships in two temperate forests

    Xugao Wang;Nathan G. Swenson;Thorsten Wiegand;Amy Wolf

  • Ecological drivers of spatial community dissimilarity, species replacement and species nestedness across temperate forests

    Xugao Wang;Thorsten Wiegand;Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira;Norman A. Bourg

  • Influence of Habitat Patchiness on Genetic Diversity and Spatial Structure of a Serpentine Endemic Plant

    Amy T. Wolf;Susan P. Harrison;James L. Hamrick

  • Consequences of spatial patterns for coexistence in species-rich plant communities

    Thorsten Wiegand;Xugao Wang;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Norman A. Bourg

  • Invasive Plant Species in Diked vs. Undiked Great Lakes Wetlands

    Bradley M. Herrick;Amy T. Wolf

  • Stochastic dilution effects weaken deterministic effects of niche-based processes in species rich forests

    Xugao Wang;Thorsten Wiegand;Nathan Jared Boardman Kraft;Nathan Garrick Swenson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. Howe
Robert W. Howe University of Wisconsin–Green Bay
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Zhanqing Hao
Zhanqing Hao Northwestern Polytechnical University
David Kenfack
David Kenfack Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
William J. McShea
William J. McShea Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Keping Ma
Keping Ma Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xugao Wang
Xugao Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stephen P. Hubbell
Stephen P. Hubbell University of California, Los Angeles
Sean M. McMahon
Sean M. McMahon Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to many rewarding and interdisciplinary career paths. As technology and flexible learning models evolve, related fields like healthcare and communication sciences have embraced online and accelerated programs tailored for various educational backgrounds.

For instance, aspiring speech-language pathologists can now pursue asha approved slp programs online to meet professional standards while studying remotely. If your undergraduate degree is in a different field, an slp bridge program offers a pathway to transition into this specialty.

Similarly, healthcare roles such as nursing offer alternative routes. Accelerated nursing programs for non nurses are now available online, allowing science graduates to shift careers quickly and affordably. Those with an interest in mental health might consider advanced practice roles, such as psychiatric nurse practitioners, which include varied compensation across the country. Explore the pmhnp salary by state to understand regional opportunities.

Whether you are starting fresh or seeking a new direction, these online degree pathways complement a background in Ecology and Evolution, expanding your options in education, healthcare, and science communication.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles