What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Linguistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognitive science
His primary areas of investigation include Second-language acquisition, Linguistics, Cognitive psychology, Input enhancement and Developmental linguistics.
His Second-language acquisition study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Working memory, Applied linguistics, Cognitive science and Language acquisition.
The various areas that Peter Robinson examines in his Linguistics study include Cognitive development, Empirical research, Learning disability and Aptitude.
His research in Cognitive psychology intersects with topics in Perception, Affect, Grammaticality and Cognitive complexity.
His Input enhancement study combines topics in areas such as Noticing hypothesis, Automaticity and Focus on form.
His study in Developmental linguistics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quantitative linguistics, Cognitive grammar, Language technology, Language and Communication Technologies and Cognitive linguistics.
His most cited work include:
- Cognition and second language instruction (1267 citations)
- Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework (670 citations)
- Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis (512 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Linguistics, Second-language acquisition, Cognitive psychology, Language acquisition and Second language.
Peter Robinson combines subjects such as Cognitive science and Natural language processing with his study of Linguistics.
He has researched Second-language acquisition in several fields, including Developmental linguistics, Second-language attrition, Aptitude, Cognitive linguistics and Psycholinguistics.
Peter Robinson interconnects Social psychology, Affect, Grammaticality, Task analysis and Cognitive complexity in the investigation of issues within Cognitive psychology.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Affect, Input enhancement is strongly linked to Unconscious mind.
His Language acquisition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Language education and Artificial intelligence.
He most often published in these fields:
- Linguistics (46.48%)
- Second-language acquisition (39.44%)
- Cognitive psychology (33.80%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2019)?
- Second language (14.08%)
- Second-language acquisition (39.44%)
- Language education (11.27%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter Robinson spends much of his time researching Second language, Second-language acquisition, Language education, Linguistics and Cognitive science.
His study brings together the fields of Language acquisition and Second-language acquisition.
His Language education research incorporates themes from Epistemology and Applied linguistics.
His Linguistics research focuses on State and how it connects with Syllabus.
His research integrates issues of Narrative, Index and Subject in his study of Cognitive science.
His Cognitive psychology study combines topics in areas such as Developmental linguistics, Second-language attrition, Comprehension approach, Cognitive linguistics and Psycholinguistics.
Between 2012 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Attention and awareness in second language acquisition (43 citations)
- Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (24 citations)
- The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Linguistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognitive science
Peter Robinson mainly focuses on Linguistics, Second-language acquisition, Task analysis, Language production and Scope.
His Task analysis study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cognitive psychology, Syllabus and Elementary cognitive task.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
