World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
14775
World Ranking
4878
National Ranking
2315

Robert DeKeyser publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert DeKeyser sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 99 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Robert DeKeyser D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert DeKeyser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert DeKeyser is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas related to language acquisition, psychology, and linguistics, as evidenced by their extensive publication record and areas of study.

The main fields of study for DeKeyser include:

  • Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities

Within these fields, the subfields of study they engage with are:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their work spans several main topics, focusing strongly on language teaching and learning. These include:

  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Text Readability and Simplification

DeKeyser has published numerous papers across several scholarly venues. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • System
  • Frontiers in Communication
  • IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
  • Modern Language Journal

Selected recent publications by DeKeyser and their collaborators are:

  • EVEN IN THE BEST-CASE SCENARIO L2 LEARNERS HAVE PERSISTENT DIFFICULTY PERCEIVING AND UTILIZING TONES IN MANDARIN, 2020, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • IMPLICIT LANGUAGE APTITUDE: CONCEPTUALIZING THE CONSTRUCT, VALIDATING THE MEASURES, AND EXAMINING THE EVIDENCE, 2021, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • Advanced Second Language Learners of Mandarin Show Persistent Deficits for Lexical Tone Encoding in Picture-to-Word Form Matching, 2021, Frontiers in Communication
  • Incidental learning of semantically transparent and opaque Chinese compounds from reading: An eye-tracking approach, 2022, System
  • Scrutinizing LLAMA D as a measure of implicit learning aptitude, 2023, Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Their frequent collaborators reflect a multidisciplinary network, including:

  • Wei Yi
  • Eric Pelzl
  • Ellen Lau
  • Taomei Guo
  • Shaofeng Li

Best Publications

  • The Robustness of Critical Period Effects in Second Language Acquisition.

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Skill Acquisition Theory

    Robert DeKeyser

  • Learning Second Language Grammar Rules: An Experiment with a Miniature Linguistic System.

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Implicit and Explicit Learning

    Unknown

  • WHAT MAKES LEARNING SECOND-LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DIFFICULT? AREVIEW OF ISSUES

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • BEYOND EXPLICIT RULE LEARNING: Automatizing Second Language Morphosyntax

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of Multiple Determinants

    Jennifer M. Goldschneider;Robert M. DeKeyser

  • What does the Critical Period really mean

    Robert DeKeyser;Jenifer Larson-Hall

  • The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency

    Robert M. Dekeyser

  • The differential role of comprehension and production practice

    Robert M. DeKeyser;Karl J. Sokalski

  • Cross-Linguistic Evidence for the Nature of Age Effects in Second Language Acquisition.

    Robert Dekeyser;Iris Alfi-Shabtay;Dorit Ravid

  • Cognitive‐Psychological Processes in Second Language Learning

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Monitoring Processes in Spanish as a Second Language During a Study Abroad Program

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Age Effects in Second Language Learning: Stepping Stones Toward Better Understanding

    Robert M. DeKeyser

  • Practice in a Second Language: List of contributors

    Unknown

  • What Gets Processed in Processing Instruction? A Commentary on Bill VanPatten’s “Processing Instruction: An Update”

    Robert DeKeyser;Rafael Salaberry;Peter Robinson;Michael Harrington

  • Practice in a Second Language: Introduction: Situating the concept of practice

    Unknown

  • Practice in a Second Language: Study abroad as foreign language practice

    Unknown

  • Bridging the Gap: Cognitive and Social Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching.

    Jan H. Hulstijn;Richard F. Young;Lourdes Ortega;Martha Bigelow

  • Interactions Between Individual Differences, Treatments, and Structures in SLA

    Robert DeKeyser

  • The Interface of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in a Second Language: Insights From Individual Differences in Cognitive Aptitudes

    Yuichi Suzuki;Robert DeKeyser

  • Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge.

    Yuichi Suzuki;Robert DeKeyser

  • Knowledge and Skill in ISLA

    Robert DeKeyser

Frequent Co-Authors

Dorit Ravid
Dorit Ravid Tel Aviv University
Jan H. Hulstijn
Jan H. Hulstijn University of Amsterdam
Alison Mackey
Alison Mackey Georgetown University
Lourdes Ortega
Lourdes Ortega Georgetown University
Peter Robinson
Peter Robinson Aoyama Gakuin University
James P. Lantolf
James P. Lantolf Pennsylvania State University
Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Young
Richard Young University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to meaningful careers in areas like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students are now choosing flexible learning options through accredited online programs, which make these fields more accessible and affordable than ever.

If you’re interested in mental health or helping others, cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs provide solid training and boost employability. For those passionate about supporting families and relationships, you might consider a marriage and family therapy degree online.

Affordability is often a key concern. Exploring programs by comparing psychology degree cost can help you find a path that fits your budget while meeting your career goals.

Lastly, a msw degree (Master of Social Work) can fast-track you into rewarding roles in community, healthcare, and educational settings. Online options make balancing further study with other commitments much simpler, letting you chart a career in the Social Sciences on your terms.

Best Scientists Citing Robert DeKeyser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles