World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10227
World Ranking
4953
National Ranking
378

Eleanor J. Highwood publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor J. Highwood sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Eleanor J. Highwood D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor J. Highwood sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eleanor J. Highwood is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. Their scientific career is primarily connected to this institution, where they have been involved in academic research and scholarship.

The available data does not provide specific details about their recent papers, which limits insight into their latest research contributions.

Similarly, there is no explicit information on frequent co-authors, so collaborative research patterns remain unspecified.

Information on publication venues associated with their work is also unavailable, preventing identification of journals or conferences where they may have presented research findings.

The data does not indicate any book publications linked to Eleanor J. Highwood, thus no insights can be given about monographs or edited volumes.

Details that typically describe main fields of study, subfields, or topics of research are not present. Therefore, the specific scientific areas or thematic focuses related to their work cannot be outlined.

There is no record of awards or honors conferred upon Eleanor J. Highwood in the available data, so no distinctions or recognitions can be reported.

Based on the data, Eleanor J. Highwood is living, and no indication exists to suggest otherwise.

Best Publications

  • New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases

    Gunnar Myhre;Eleanor J. Highwood;Keith P. Shine;Frode Stordal

  • Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing

    M. Etminan;G. Myhre;E. J. Highwood;K. P. Shine

  • The tropical tropopause

    E. J. Highwood;B. J. Hoskins

  • Radiative properties and direct radiative effect of Saharan dust measured by the C-130 aircraft during SHADE: 1. Solar spectrum

    Jim Haywood;Pete Francis;Simon Osborne;Martin Glew

  • When smoke gets in our eyes: the multiple impacts of atmospheric black carbon on climate, air quality and health

    Eleanor J. Highwood;Robert P. Kinnersley

  • Optical properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign

    Claire L. Ryder;Ellie J. Highwood;Philip D. Rosenberg;Jamie Trembath

  • Measurement and modeling of the Saharan dust radiative impact: Overview of the Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE)

    D. Tanré;J. Haywood;J. Pelon;J. F. Léon

  • Overview of the Dust and Biomass-burning Experiment and African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Special Observing Period-0

    Jim M. Haywood;Jacques Pelon;Paola Formenti;N. A. Bharmal

  • Evolution of biomass burning aerosol properties from an agricultural fire in southern Africa

    Steven J. Abel;Jim M. Haywood;Eleanor J. Highwood;Jia Li

  • Seasonal variations of the physical and optical characteristics of Saharan dust: Results from the Dust Outflow and Deposition to the Ocean (DODO) experiment

    C. L. McConnell;E. J. Highwood;H. Coe;P. Formenti

  • Regional variability of the composition of mineral dust from western Africa: Results from the AMMA SOP0/DABEX and DODO field campaigns

    P. Formenti;Jean-Louis Rajot;K. Desboeufs;Sandrine Caquineau

  • Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic

    Claire L. Ryder;Franco Marenco;Jennifer K. Brooke;Victor Estelles

  • Radiative properties and direct effect of Saharan dust measured by the C‐130 aircraft during Saharan Dust Experiment (SHADE): 2. Terrestrial spectrum

    Eleanor J. Highwood;James M. Haywood;Michael D. Silverstone;Michael D. Silverstone;Stuart M. Newman

  • The influence of anthropogenic aerosol on multi-decadal variations of historical global climate

    L J Wilcox;E J Highwood;N J Dunstone

  • An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms

    Keith P. Shine;Jolene Cook;Eleanor J. Highwood;Manoj M. Joshi

  • Airborne measurements of the spatial distribution of aerosol chemical composition across Europe and evolution of the organic fraction

    W. T. Morgan;J. D. Allan;K. N. Bower;E. J. Highwood

  • Coarse and giant particles are ubiquitous in Saharan dust export regions and are radiatively significant over the Sahara

    Claire L. Ryder;Elleanor J. Highwood;Adrian Walser;Petra Seibert

  • Sensitivity of Twentieth-Century Sahel Rainfall to Sulfate Aerosol and CO2 Forcing

    Duncan Ackerley;Ben B. B. Booth;Sylvia H. E. Knight;Eleanor J. Highwood

  • Broad range of 2050 warming from an observationally constrained large climate model ensemble

    Daniel J Rowlands;Daniel J Rowlands;David J Frame;Duncan Ackerley;Duncan Ackerley;Tolu Aina

  • Black carbon measurements in the boundary layer over western and northern Europe

    G. R. McMeeking;T. Hamburger;D. Liu;M. Flynn

  • Climate response to tropospheric absorbing aerosols in an Intermediate General-Circulation Model

    J. Cook;E. J. Highwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Haywood
Jim Haywood University of Exeter
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Laura Wilcox
Laura Wilcox University of Reading
Gunnar Myhre
Gunnar Myhre Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Keith P. Shine
Keith P. Shine University of Reading
Andrew Charlton-Perez
Andrew Charlton-Perez University of Reading
Keith Bower
Keith Bower University of Manchester
Paul I. Williams
Paul I. Williams University of Manchester
Roy G. Grainger
Roy G. Grainger University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences can open doors to various interdisciplinary roles. Many students choose to complement their studies with advanced online programs such as the online eds to edd bridge program, which offers educators and professionals a path to doctoral-level expertise with a flexible schedule.

For those interested in social impact within environmental contexts, affordable options like dsw programs provide practical knowledge to enhance community well-being through sustainable practices. Alternatively, students seeking broader educational foundations may explore the online general studies degree affordable options, which allow for a customizable curriculum that integrates environmental themes with other disciplines.

Those new to higher education or looking for a quicker entry into the workforce might consider programs listed under easiest bachelor degree to get. These degrees often emphasize foundational skills that support environmental careers and can serve as stepping stones to more specialized roles.

Exploring these related online degrees can provide flexible, affordable, and diverse pathways to advance your environmental science career.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor J. Highwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles