World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
12049
World Ranking
10932
National Ranking
845

Guy M. Poppy publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy M. Poppy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 199 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Guy M. Poppy D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy M. Poppy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy M. Poppy is a researcher affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their work spans fields such as Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, emphasizing various subfields including Ecology, Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Physiology.

Their research focuses on multiple topics, including:

  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Poppy has contributed to various publications, with recent papers including:

  • Potential human transmission of amyloid β pathology: surveillance and risks, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • A national approach for transformation of the UK food system, 2020, Nature Food
  • A photovoice assessment for illuminating the role of inland fisheries to livelihoods and the local challenges experienced through the lens of fishers in a climate-driven lake of Malawi, 2021, AMBIO
  • Trade and dietary preferences can determine micronutrient security in the United Kingdom, 2022, Nature Food
  • Research framework for food security and sustainability, 2025, npj Science of Food

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Nature Food
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • npj Science of Food
  • AMBIO

Guy M. Poppy collaborates with several co-authors regularly, such as:

  • Riaz Bhunnoo
  • Bob Doherty
  • Carol Wagstaff
  • Martin White
  • Lynn V. Dicks

Best Publications

  • Insect-resistant transgenic plants

    Tanja H Schuler;Guy M Poppy;Brian R Kerry;Ian Denholm

  • Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems

    John A. Dearing;Rong Wang;Ke Zhang;James G. Dyke

  • New roles for cis-jasmone as an insect semiochemical and in plant defense.

    Michael A. Birkett;Colin A. M. Campbell;Keith Chamberlain;Emilio Guerrieri

  • Identification of Semiochemicals Released During Aphid Feeding That Attract Parasitoid Aphidius ervi

    Yongjun Du;Guy M. Poppy;Wilf Powell;John A. Pickett

  • Strategies Involved in the Location of Hosts by the ParasitoidAphidius erviHaliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae)

    W Powell;F Pennacchio;G.M Poppy;E Tremblay

  • Relative importance of semiochemicals from first and second trophic levels in host foraging behavior ofAphidius ervi.

    Y J Du;G M Poppy;W Powell

  • Parasitoid behaviour and Bt plants.

    Tanja H. Schuler;Roel P. J. Potting;Ian Denholm;Guy M. Poppy

  • Scents and Eversible Scent Structures of Male Moths

    M. C. Birch;G. M. Poppy;T. C. Baker

  • Potential side effects of insect-resistant transgenic plants on arthropod natural enemies.

    Tanja H. Schuler;Guy M. Poppy;Brian R. Kerry;Ian Denholm

  • Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding

    G.M. Poppy;S. Chiotha;F. Eigenbrod;C. A. Harvey

  • Induction and Systemic Release of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles Mediating In-Flight Orientation of Aphidius ervi

    E. Guerrieri;G. M. Poppy;W. Powell;E. Tremblay

  • The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani.

    A. Storeck;A. Storeck;G.M. Poppy;H.F. van Emden;W. Powell

  • Global importance of vertebrate pollinators for plant reproductive success: a meta-analysis

    Fabrizia Ratto;Benno I. Simmons;Rebecca Spake;Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez;Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez

  • Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock?

    Mike J. Wilkinson;Jeremy Sweet;Guy M. Poppy

  • How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis

    Katy L. Johnson;Alan F. Raybould;Malcolm D. Hudson;Guy M. Poppy

  • GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects

    Guy Poppy

  • Distribution and abundance of aphidophagous hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in wildflower patches and field margin habitats.

    Jamie P. Sutherland;Matthew S. Sullivan;Guy M. Poppy

  • Comparison of glass vessels and plastic bags for enclosing living plant parts for headspace analysis.

    Alex Stewart-Jones;Guy M. Poppy

  • Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques

    Sara O.I. Ramirez-Gomez;Sara O.I. Ramirez-Gomez;Sara O.I. Ramirez-Gomez;Carlos A. Torres-Vitolas;Kate Schreckenberg;Miroslav Honzák

  • The influence of floral character on the foraging behaviour of the hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus

    Jamie P. Sutherland;Jamie P. Sutherland;Matthew S. Sullivan;Guy M. Poppy

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilf Powell
Wilf Powell Rothamsted Research
Ian Denholm
Ian Denholm University of Hertfordshire
Francesco Pennacchio
Francesco Pennacchio University of Naples Federico II
John A. Pickett
John A. Pickett Cardiff University
Don R. Reynolds
Don R. Reynolds University of Greenwich
Juliet L. Osborne
Juliet L. Osborne University of Exeter
Alan D. Smith
Alan D. Smith Rothamsted Research
Suzanne J. Clark
Suzanne J. Clark Rothamsted Research
James D. Blande
James D. Blande University of Eastern Finland
C. Neal Stewart
C. Neal Stewart University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a diverse array of career options across healthcare and research. For students seeking alternative healthcare roles, online radiology programs offer a path to work with advanced imaging technology and patient care. These associate degrees are ideal for those interested in applied science with direct clinical application.

Another promising area is nutrition and wellness. Earning an advanced credential through dietetic masters programs equips graduates for roles as registered dietitians or nutritionists, connecting biochemistry with practical human health solutions.

For immediate entry into the medical workforce, consider medical assistant classes online with financial aid. These programs provide both foundational science knowledge and hands-on skills, and financial support makes these pathways accessible to a wider range of students.

Lastly, career mobility is possible with flexible options like the ma to lpn bridge program online. This program allows medical assistants to advance their healthcare careers by becoming Licensed Practical Nurses, blending science learning with patient care expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Guy M. Poppy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles