World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
14509
World Ranking
1967
National Ranking
235

Juliet L. Osborne publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet L. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 156 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Juliet L. Osborne D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juliet L. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juliet L. Osborne is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to fields related to agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Their research portfolio encompasses subfields such as ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, insect science, genetics, ecology, and social psychology.

The main topics of Osborne's work include plant and animal studies, insect and pesticide research, insect and arachnid ecology and behavior, animal and plant science education, plant parasitism and resistance, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and species distribution and climate change.

Osborne has published several recent papers with varied focuses. These include:

  • Enhancing road verges to aid pollinator conservation: A review (2020) in Biological Conservation
  • Socio-psychological factors, beyond knowledge, predict people's engagement in pollinator conservation (2020) in People and Nature
  • Mass-flowering crops have a greater impact than semi-natural habitat on crop pollinators and pollen deposition (2020) in Landscape Ecology
  • Spatial extent of road pollution: A national analysis (2021) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Impacts of multiple pollutants on pollinator activity in road verges (2021) in Journal of Applied Ecology

Osborne frequently publishes in venues such as The Science of The Total Environment, Communications Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Biological Conservation, and People and Nature. The scholar collaborates regularly with fellow researchers including Benjamin B. Phillips, James M. Bullock, Peter J. Kennedy, Kevin J. Gaston, and Rosalind F. Shaw.

This network of frequent coauthors supports a robust interdisciplinary approach across various ecological and biological topics, particularly focusing on pollinators, road verge habitats, and the effects of pollutants. The collaboration with specialists in insect science and ecology aids in expanding the understanding of environmental impacts on insect behavior and conservation strategies.

Overall, Juliet L. Osborne's research addresses issues at the interface of ecology, environmental science, and social psychology, contributing to knowledge on how ecological factors and human attitudes affect insect populations and conservation efforts.

Best Publications

  • Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators

    M. A. Fürst;D. P. McMahon;J. L. Osborne;R. J. Paxton

  • Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide

    Paul H. Williams;Juliet L. Osborne

  • A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar

    J.L. Osborne;S.J. Clark;R.J. Morris;I.H. Williams

  • Bees and the Pollination of Crops and Wild Flowers in the European Community

    Sarah A Corbet;Ingrid H Williams;Juliet L Osborne

  • Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape

    Juliet L. Osborne;Andrew P. Martin;Norman L. Carreck;Jennifer L. Swain

  • Ontogeny of orientation flight in the honeybee revealed by harmonic radar

    Elizabeth A. Capaldi;Alan D. Smith;Juliet L. Osborne;Susan E. Fahrbach

  • An Interspecific Comparison of Foraging Range and Nest Density of Four Bumblebee (Bombus) Species

    Mairi E Knight;Andrew P Martin;Stephen Bishop;Juliet L Osborne

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:understanding nature's value to society. Synthesis of key findings

    R. Watson;S. Albon;R. Aspinall;M. Austen

  • Tracking bees with harmonic radar

    J. R. Riley;A. D. Smith;D. R. Reynolds;A. S. Edwards

  • Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats

    Juliet L. Osborne;Andrew P. Martin;Chris R. Shortall;Alan D. Todd

  • Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops

    C. Hawes;A. J. Haughton;J. L. Osborne;D. B. Roy

  • BEEHAVE: a systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure

    Matthias A. Becher;Matthias A. Becher;Volker Grimm;Volker Grimm;Pernille Thorbek;Juliane Horn

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report

    R Watson;S Albon;R Aspinall;M Austen

  • Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival

    Dave Goulson;Olivier Lepais;Stephanie O’Connor;Juliet L. Osborne

  • An introduction to the Farm-Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops

    L. G. Firbank;M. S. Heard;I. P. Woiwod;C. Hawes

  • Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield

    Ben A. Woodcock;M. P. D. Garratt;G.D. Powney;R.F. Shaw

  • Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods.

    A. J. Haughton;G. T. Champion;C. Hawes;M. S. Heard

  • Honeybees perform optimal scale-free searching flights when attempting to locate a food source.

    Andrew M. Reynolds;Alan D. Smith;Don R. Reynolds;Norman L. Carreck

  • Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators

    Richard J. Gill;Katherine C R Baldock;Mark J F Brown;James E. Cresswell

  • Flight metabolic rate and Pgi genotype influence butterfly dispersal rate in the field

    Kristjan Niitepõld;Alan D. Smith;Juliet L. Osborne;Don R. Reynolds

  • An economic model of the limits to foraging range in central place foragers with numerical solutions for bumblebees

    James E. Cresswell;Juliet L. Osborne;David Goulson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan D. Smith
Alan D. Smith Rothamsted Research
Ingrid H. Williams
Ingrid H. Williams Estonian University of Life Sciences
Suzanne J. Clark
Suzanne J. Clark Rothamsted Research
Dave Goulson
Dave Goulson University of Sussex
Matthew S. Heard
Matthew S. Heard Rothamsted Research
Don R. Reynolds
Don R. Reynolds University of Greenwich
Volker Grimm
Volker Grimm Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Joe N. Perry
Joe N. Perry Rothamsted Research
Les G. Firbank
Les G. Firbank University of Leeds
David A. Bohan
David A. Bohan INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse careers and online degree options in the life sciences. Many students choose to combine their biology background with hands-on healthcare roles, including nursing or allied health, to expand career opportunities. For instance, those interested in mental health and integrated patient care may want to research how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make, as this career can be both rewarding and well-compensated depending on the state.

Educational pathways are flexible, with programs tailored for different stages of your career. If you’re wondering how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner, you may be surprised at the accelerated options now available online. For registered nurses aiming to expand their qualifications quickly, some institutions offer rn to bsn 6 months programs, designed for rapid upskilling. Additionally, nurses with an ADN degree can enroll in adn to np bridge programs, helping shorten the journey to advanced practice roles.

Whether your passion is research, education, or patient care, related online degrees and bridge programs offer flexible, strategic entry points to meaningful careers in science and health.

Best Scientists Citing Juliet L. Osborne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles