World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
19103
World Ranking
18159
National Ranking
9051

W. John Boscardin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. John Boscardin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 209 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

W. John Boscardin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. John Boscardin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. John Boscardin is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on subfields including Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Surgery, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

W. John Boscardin has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • JAMA Network Open
  • JAMA Internal Medicine
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "Association of Race and Ethnicity With Incidence of Dementia Among Older Adults", 2022, published in JAMA
  • "Clinical Presentation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Pregnant and Recently Pregnant People", 2020, published in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Infant Outcomes Following Maternal Infection With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): First Report From the Pregnancy Coronavirus Outcomes Registry (PRIORITY) Study", 2020, published in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "The epidemiology of social isolation and loneliness among older adults during the last years of life", 2021, published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • "Evaluation of Time to Benefit of Statins for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Adults Aged 50 to 75 Years", 2020, published in JAMA Internal Medicine

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Alexander K. Smith
  • Kenneth E. Covinsky
  • Sei J. Lee
  • Michael A. Steinman
  • Kristine Yaffe

Best Publications

  • Risk Stratification for In-Hospital Mortality in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure: Classification and Regression Tree Analysis

    Gregg C. Fonarow;Kirkwood F. Adams;William T. Abraham;Clyde W. Yancy

  • Contribution of Major Diseases to Disparities in Mortality

    Mitchell D Wong;Martin F Shapiro;W John Boscardin;Susan L Ettner

  • Progressive hemorrhage after head trauma: predictors and consequences of the evolving injury

    Matthias Oertel;Daniel F. Kelly;David McArthur;W. John Boscardin

  • Clemastine fumarate as a remyelinating therapy for multiple sclerosis (ReBUILD): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial

    Ari J Green;Jeffrey M Gelfand;Bruce A Cree;Carolyn Bevan

  • Pharmaceutical industry-sponsored meals and physician prescribing patterns for medicare beneficiaries

    Colette DeJong;Thomas Aguilar;Chien Wen Tseng;Grace A. Lin

  • Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease

    Jennifer C. Lai;Kenneth E. Covinsky;Jennifer L. Dodge;W. John Boscardin

  • Association Between Persistent Pain and Memory Decline and Dementia in a Longitudinal Cohort of Elders.

    Elizabeth L. Whitlock;L. Grisell Diaz-Ramirez;M. Maria Glymour;W. John Boscardin

  • Preventability and Causes of Readmissions in a National Cohort of General Medicine Patients

    Andrew D. Auerbach;Sunil Kripalani;Eduard E. Vasilevskis;Neil Sehgal

  • Energy Dysfunction as a Predictor of Outcome after Moderate or Severe Head Injury: Indices of Oxygen, Glucose, and Lactate Metabolism:

    Thomas C Glenn;Thomas C Glenn;Daniel F Kelly;W John Boscardin;David L McArthur

  • International Prevalence of Indoor Tanning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Mackenzie R. Wehner;Mackenzie R. Wehner;Mackenzie R. Wehner;Mary Margaret Chren;Mary Margaret Chren;Danielle Nameth;Aditi Choudhry

  • Association of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury With and Without Loss of Consciousness With Dementia in US Military Veterans.

    Deborah E. Barnes;Deborah E. Barnes;Amy L. Byers;Amy L. Byers;Raquel C. Gardner;Raquel C. Gardner;Karen H. Seal;Karen H. Seal

  • Posttraumatic vasospasm: the epidemiology, severity, and time course of an underestimated phenomenon: a prospective study performed in 299 patients

    Matthias Oertel;W John Boscardin;Walter D Obrist;Thomas C Glenn

  • Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark

    Sei J Lee;W John Boscardin;Irena Stijacic-Cenzer;Jessamyn Conell-Price

  • The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA

    Naomi S Bardach;Renée Asteria-Peñaloza;W John Boscardin;R Adams Dudley

  • Efficacy of hyperventilation, blood pressure elevation, and metabolic suppression therapy in controlling intracranial pressure after head injury.

    Matthias Oertel;Daniel F Kelly;Jae Hong Lee;David L McArthur

  • Tumor recurrence 5 years after treatment of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

    Mary-Margaret Chren;Mary-Margaret Chren;Eleni Linos;Jeanette S. Torres;Sarah E. Stuart

  • Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study

    Rosa Ahn;Alexandra Woodbridge;Ann Abraham;Susan Saba

  • The Epidemiology of Pain During the Last 2 Years of Life

    Alexander K. Smith;Irena Stijacic Cenzer;Sara J. Knight;Kathleen A. Puntillo

  • CHRONIC HYPOPITUITARISM AFTER TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: RISK ASSESSMENT AND RELATIONSHIP TO OUTCOME

    Sumati Bavisetty;Supriya Bavisetty;David L. McArthur;Joshua R. Dusick

  • Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Rebecca L Sudore;Dean Schillinger;Dean Schillinger;Mary T Katen;Ying Shi;Ying Shi

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth E. Covinsky
Kenneth E. Covinsky University of California, San Francisco
C. Seth Landefeld
C. Seth Landefeld University of Alabama at Birmingham
Neil A. Martin
Neil A. Martin University of California, Los Angeles
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco
Otoniel Martínez-Maza
Otoniel Martínez-Maza University of California, Los Angeles
Roger Detels
Roger Detels University of California, Los Angeles
Elizabeth C. Breen
Elizabeth C. Breen University of California, Los Angeles
Richard W. Price
Richard W. Price University of California, San Francisco
David A. Hovda
David A. Hovda University of California, Los Angeles
Martin F. Shapiro
Martin F. Shapiro Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that offer flexibility and professional growth. Careers in healthcare are diverse, and online education now provides high-quality options for aspiring professionals beyond traditional medical school.

For those looking to move into leadership, healthcare administration degrees offer a fast track to roles such as hospital administrator or health services manager. Students seeking advanced clinical opportunities can explore adn to np programs online, which allow registered nurses to become nurse practitioners with greater autonomy.

Additionally, wellness-driven careers are on the rise. Earning a degree through online nutrition degree programs prepares graduates to work in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, or research. For those aiming at executive or policy-focused roles, consider online mha programs, which are designed to build managerial skills for a rapidly changing healthcare system.

Exploring these online options can help you launch or advance a meaningful healthcare career—often with the flexibility to balance work, study, and life.

Best Scientists Citing W. John Boscardin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles