World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17012 15995 8531 7888 590 26521

Scott McNitt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott McNitt between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott McNitt published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 27.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2013. 21 of the 631 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2013. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 48 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 51 publications 2014: 36 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

631 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott McNitt: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 10
2006 27
2007 26
2008 17
2009 15
2010 32
2011 48
2012 29
2013 51
2014 36
2015 41
2016 29
2017 35
2018 27
2019 22
2020 36
2021 30
2022 31
2023 35
2024 30
2025 19
2026 2
Total 631
Download as CSV

Scott McNitt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott McNitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 590 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 590
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott McNitt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott McNitt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott McNitt is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. The primary field of their research is Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work further extends into Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Emergency Medicine.

Their scholarly output concentrates on several key topics, including:

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Recent papers associated with Scott McNitt include:

  • Predicted benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the MADIT-ICD benefit score (2020, European Heart Journal)
  • Effect of a Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team on Patient Mortality (2021, The American Journal of Cardiology)
  • Survival After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks (2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes Among Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Receiving Primary ICD Therapy (2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology)
  • Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation During Long-Term Implantable Cardiac Monitoring Following Cryptogenic Stroke (2020, Journal of the American Heart Association)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McNitt include:

  • Ilan Goldenberg
  • Mehmet K. Aktaş
  • Wojciech Zaręba
  • Valentina Kutyifa
  • Arwa Younis

Their work has appeared predominantly in several publication venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD Programming

    Arthur J. Moss;Claudio Schuger;Christopher A. Beck;Mary W. Brown

  • Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II : Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Survival Impact

    James P. Daubert;Wojciech Zareba;David S. Cannom;Scott McNitt

  • Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Wojciech Zareba;Helmut Klein;Iwona Cygankiewicz;W. Jackson Hall

  • Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator

    Arthur J. Moss;Henry Greenberg;Robert B. Case;Wojciech Zareba

  • Left Ventricular Lead Position and Clinical Outcome in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial

    Jagmeet P. Singh;Helmut U. Klein;David T. Huang;Sven Reek

  • Risk Stratification for Primary Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    Ilan Goldenberg;Anant K. Vyas;W. Jackson Hall;Arthur J. Moss

  • Clinical Aspects of Type-1 Long-QT Syndrome by Location, Coding Type, and Biophysical Function of Mutations Involving the KCNQ1 Gene

    Arthur J. Moss;Wataru Shimizu;Arthur A.M. Wilde;Jeffrey A. Towbin

  • Long QT syndrome in adults

    Andrew J. Sauer;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt;Derick R. Peterson

  • The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II.

    Jonathan S. Steinberg;Avi Fischer;Paul Wang;Claudio Schuger

  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is More Effective in Women Than in Men: The MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) Trial

    Aysha Arshad;Arthur J. Moss;Elyse Foster;Luigi Padeletti

  • Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure.

    Ilan Goldenberg;Valentina Kutyifa;Helmut U. Klein;David S. Cannom

  • Long QT Syndrome and Pregnancy

    Rahul Seth;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt;Wojciech Zareba

  • Risk Factors for Aborted Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Cardiac Death in Children With the Congenital Long-QT Syndrome

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;Derick R. Peterson;Scott McNitt

  • Ranolazine Shortens Repolarization in Patients with Sustained Inward Sodium Current Due To Type-3 Long QT Syndrome

    Arthur J. Moss;Wojciech Zareba M.D.;Karl Q. Schwarz;Spencer Rosero

  • Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.

    Jonathan C. Hsu;Scott D. Solomon;Mikhail Bourgoun;Scott McNitt

  • Risk of Aborted Cardiac Arrest or Sudden Cardiac Death During Adolescence in the Long-QT Syndrome

    Jenny B. Hobbs;Derick R. Peterson;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt

  • Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;W. Jackson Hall;Elyse Foster

  • Risk for Life-Threatening Cardiac Events in Patients With Genotype-Confirmed Long-QT Syndrome and Normal-Range Corrected QT Intervals

    Ilan Goldenberg;Samuel Horr;Arthur J. Moss;Coeli M. Lopes

  • Association of competitive and recreational sport participation with cardiac events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from the North American multidisciplinary study of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

    Anne Christine Ruwald;Anne Christine Ruwald;Frank Marcus;N. A.Mark Estes;Mark Link

  • Causes and Consequences of Heart Failure After Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;W. Jackson Hall;Scott McNitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Wojciech Zareba
Wojciech Zareba University of Rochester Medical Center
Arthur J. Moss
Arthur J. Moss University of Rochester Medical Center
Ilan Goldenberg
Ilan Goldenberg University of Rochester Medical Center
Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Helmut U. Klein
Helmut U. Klein University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul J. Wang
Paul J. Wang Stanford University
jeffrey a towbin
jeffrey a towbin St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Béla Merkely
Béla Merkely Semmelweis University
Elyse Foster
Elyse Foster University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional medical doctor programs, the healthcare field offers a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. For nurses seeking to advance, the best dnp programs online provide opportunities to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree—from wherever you are—opening doors to leadership and specialty roles.

Those interested in pharmaceuticals might explore pharmd online programs, which allow students to train as licensed pharmacists through flexible distance learning options.

Not all medical careers require years of clinical training. If you’re passionate about technology and health data, a health information technology online degree prepares you for vital roles in managing patient records, privacy, and data analysis within hospitals and clinics.

For those looking for entry-level opportunities with rapid job growth, pursuing a certification in medical coding is increasingly popular. Understanding medical coding certification cost can help you make an informed decision before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Scott McNitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles