World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
26521
World Ranking
17013
National Ranking
8532

Scott McNitt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott McNitt sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 590 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scott McNitt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott McNitt sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott McNitt is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. The primary field of their research is Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work further extends into Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Emergency Medicine.

Their scholarly output concentrates on several key topics, including:

  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Recent papers associated with Scott McNitt include:

  • Predicted benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the MADIT-ICD benefit score (2020, European Heart Journal)
  • Effect of a Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team on Patient Mortality (2021, The American Journal of Cardiology)
  • Survival After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks (2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Arrhythmic and Mortality Outcomes Among Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Receiving Primary ICD Therapy (2021, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology)
  • Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation During Long-Term Implantable Cardiac Monitoring Following Cryptogenic Stroke (2020, Journal of the American Heart Association)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McNitt include:

  • Ilan Goldenberg
  • Mehmet K. Aktaş
  • Wojciech Zaręba
  • Valentina Kutyifa
  • Arwa Younis

Their work has appeared predominantly in several publication venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Best Publications

  • Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD Programming

    Arthur J. Moss;Claudio Schuger;Christopher A. Beck;Mary W. Brown

  • Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II : Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Survival Impact

    James P. Daubert;Wojciech Zareba;David S. Cannom;Scott McNitt

  • Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Wojciech Zareba;Helmut Klein;Iwona Cygankiewicz;W. Jackson Hall

  • Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator

    Arthur J. Moss;Henry Greenberg;Robert B. Case;Wojciech Zareba

  • Left Ventricular Lead Position and Clinical Outcome in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial

    Jagmeet P. Singh;Helmut U. Klein;David T. Huang;Sven Reek

  • Risk Stratification for Primary Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    Ilan Goldenberg;Anant K. Vyas;W. Jackson Hall;Arthur J. Moss

  • Clinical Aspects of Type-1 Long-QT Syndrome by Location, Coding Type, and Biophysical Function of Mutations Involving the KCNQ1 Gene

    Arthur J. Moss;Wataru Shimizu;Arthur A.M. Wilde;Jeffrey A. Towbin

  • Long QT syndrome in adults

    Andrew J. Sauer;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt;Derick R. Peterson

  • The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II.

    Jonathan S. Steinberg;Avi Fischer;Paul Wang;Claudio Schuger

  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is More Effective in Women Than in Men: The MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) Trial

    Aysha Arshad;Arthur J. Moss;Elyse Foster;Luigi Padeletti

  • Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure.

    Ilan Goldenberg;Valentina Kutyifa;Helmut U. Klein;David S. Cannom

  • Long QT Syndrome and Pregnancy

    Rahul Seth;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt;Wojciech Zareba

  • Risk Factors for Aborted Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Cardiac Death in Children With the Congenital Long-QT Syndrome

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;Derick R. Peterson;Scott McNitt

  • Ranolazine Shortens Repolarization in Patients with Sustained Inward Sodium Current Due To Type-3 Long QT Syndrome

    Arthur J. Moss;Wojciech Zareba M.D.;Karl Q. Schwarz;Spencer Rosero

  • Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.

    Jonathan C. Hsu;Scott D. Solomon;Mikhail Bourgoun;Scott McNitt

  • Risk of Aborted Cardiac Arrest or Sudden Cardiac Death During Adolescence in the Long-QT Syndrome

    Jenny B. Hobbs;Derick R. Peterson;Arthur J. Moss;Scott McNitt

  • Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;W. Jackson Hall;Elyse Foster

  • Risk for Life-Threatening Cardiac Events in Patients With Genotype-Confirmed Long-QT Syndrome and Normal-Range Corrected QT Intervals

    Ilan Goldenberg;Samuel Horr;Arthur J. Moss;Coeli M. Lopes

  • Association of competitive and recreational sport participation with cardiac events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from the North American multidisciplinary study of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

    Anne Christine Ruwald;Anne Christine Ruwald;Frank Marcus;N. A.Mark Estes;Mark Link

  • Causes and Consequences of Heart Failure After Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II

    Ilan Goldenberg;Arthur J. Moss;W. Jackson Hall;Scott McNitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Wojciech Zareba
Wojciech Zareba University of Rochester Medical Center
Arthur J. Moss
Arthur J. Moss University of Rochester Medical Center
Ilan Goldenberg
Ilan Goldenberg University of Rochester Medical Center
Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Helmut U. Klein
Helmut U. Klein University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul J. Wang
Paul J. Wang Stanford University
jeffrey a towbin
jeffrey a towbin St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Béla Merkely
Béla Merkely Semmelweis University
Elyse Foster
Elyse Foster University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional medical doctor programs, the healthcare field offers a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. For nurses seeking to advance, the best dnp programs online provide opportunities to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree—from wherever you are—opening doors to leadership and specialty roles.

Those interested in pharmaceuticals might explore pharmd online programs, which allow students to train as licensed pharmacists through flexible distance learning options.

Not all medical careers require years of clinical training. If you’re passionate about technology and health data, a health information technology online degree prepares you for vital roles in managing patient records, privacy, and data analysis within hospitals and clinics.

For those looking for entry-level opportunities with rapid job growth, pursuing a certification in medical coding is increasingly popular. Understanding medical coding certification cost can help you make an informed decision before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Scott McNitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles