World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 57 644 595 31 31 206 16891

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet R. McColl-Kennedy between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet R. McColl-Kennedy published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2003. 6 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2003. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1985 2025

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet R. McColl-Kennedy: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 3
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 3
1998 7
1999 14
2000 5
2001 7
2002 12
2003 15
2004 5
2005 10
2006 6
2007 7
2008 7
2009 7
2010 11
2011 5
2012 6
2013 10
2014 3
2015 12
2016 4
2017 5
2018 3
2019 7
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 6
2024 2
2025 4
Total 219
Download as CSV

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy publications per year - data summary

  • Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, a Business and Management scholar from University of Queensland, has 219 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2003, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1986, 1993 and 1994, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987 and 1996).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.6 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 23 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 32 publications (2.3 per year); 1999-2012: 117 publications (8.4 per year); 2013-2025: 70 publications (5.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet R. McColl-Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 205–209 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 206 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48 206
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, a Business and Management scholar from University of Queensland, records 206 publications - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Janet R. McColl-Kennedy ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet R. McColl-Kennedy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44 57
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, a Business and Management scholar from University of Queensland, records 57 D-Index - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Janet R. McColl-Kennedy ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields within business and health professions, with a primary focus on marketing, organizational behavior, and general health professions.

The scientist's work extensively covers the areas of service and product innovation, customer service quality and loyalty, digital marketing and social media, innovation and socioeconomic development, global healthcare and medical tourism, information systems theories and implementation, and innovative approaches in technology and social development.

Frequent venues for publishing their research include:

  • Journal of Services Marketing
  • Journal of Service Research
  • Journal of service management
  • Medical Care Research and Review
  • International Journal of Consumer Studies

Among their recent papers are:

  • Service Research Priorities: Managing and Delivering Service in Turbulent Times, 2021, Journal of Service Research
  • Service Research Priorities: Designing Sustainable Service Ecosystems, 2021, Journal of Service Research
  • Dynamics of wellbeing co-creation: a psychological ownership perspective, 2020, Journal of service management
  • Text mining analysis roadmap (TMAR) for service research, 2020, Journal of Services Marketing
  • Goal Setting and Health-Related Outcomes in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature From 2000 to 2020, 2022, Medical Care Research and Review

Janet R. McColl-Kennedy has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Amy L. Ostrom
  • Mohamed Zaki
  • Zahra Alsadat Tabaei Aghdaei
  • Teegan Green
  • Joy M. Field

Their subfields of study balance marketing and organizational behavior alongside sociology, technology, and innovation management. The scientist's work bridges theory and implementation across diverse topics, supporting advances in service ecosystems and health-related outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles

    Janet R McColl-Kennedy;Stephen L Vargo;Tracey Sara Dagger;Jillian C Sweeney

  • Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance

    Janet R McColl-Kennedy;Ronald D Anderson

  • Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery

    Janet R. Mccoll-Kennedy;Beverley A. Sparks

  • Social-servicescape conceptual model

    Alastair Tombs;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

  • Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms

    Ruth N. Bolton;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Lilliemay Cheung;Andrew Gallan

  • Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting

    Rebekah Russell-Bennett;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Leonard V. Coote

  • Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting

    Beverley A Sparks;Janet R McColl-Kennedy

  • Experience as a moderator of involvement and satisfaction on brand loyalty in a business-to-business setting 02-314R

    Rebekah Bennett;Charmine Emma Jean Hartel;Janet R McColl-Kennedy

  • Customer Effort in Value Cocreation Activities: Improving Quality of Life and Behavioral Intentions of Health Care Customers

    Jillian C Sweeney;Tracey Sara Danaher;Janet R McColl-Kennedy

  • Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem

    Pennie Frow;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Adrian Payne

  • Small details that make big differences : A radical approach to consumption experience as a firm's differentiating strategy

    Ruth N. Bolton;Anders Gustafsson;Janet McColl-Kennedy;Nancy J. Sirianni

  • Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective

    Pennie Frow;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Toni Hilton;Anthony Davidson

  • Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms

    Sandeep Salunke;Jay Weerawardena;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

  • Customer rage episodes: Emotions, expressions and behaviors

    Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Paul G. Patterson;Amy K. Smith;Michael K. Brady

  • Fresh perspectives on customer experience

    Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Anders Gustafsson;Elina Jaakkola;Phil Klaus

  • Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: Insights from project-oriented service firms

    Sandeep Salunke;Jay Weerawardena;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

  • Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development

    Suellen J. Hogan;Geoffrey N. Soutar;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Jillian C. Sweeney

  • Subordinate–manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment

    Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Ronald D. Anderson

  • The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy

    Sandeep Salunke;Jay Weerawardena;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

  • Gaining Customer Experience Insights That Matter

    Janet R. McColl-Kennedy;Mohamed Zaki;Katherine N. Lemon;Florian Urmetzer

  • The social servicescape: A conceptual model

    A. G. Tombs;J. R. McColl-Kennedy

  • Experience as a moderator of involvement and satisfaction on brand loyalty in a business-to-business setting

    Rebekah Bennett;Charmine E. J. Hartel;Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

Frequent Co-Authors

Beverley Sparks
Beverley Sparks Griffith University
Jay Weerawardena
Jay Weerawardena University of Queensland
Paul G. Patterson
Paul G. Patterson University of New South Wales
Charmine E. J. Härtel
Charmine E. J. Härtel Monash University
Jillian C. Sweeney
Jillian C. Sweeney University of Western Australia
Lars Witell
Lars Witell Karlstad University
Michael K. Brady
Michael K. Brady Florida State University
Geoffrey N. Soutar
Geoffrey N. Soutar University of Western Australia
Nerina L. Jimmieson
Nerina L. Jimmieson Queensland University of Technology
Graham Leslie Bradley
Graham Leslie Bradley Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Business and Management students often consider related degree fields to expand career opportunities. For those interested in healthcare leadership, an online health administration degree offers flexible learning and prepares graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Advancing further, the cheapest online mha programs can provide in-depth training in healthcare policy, informatics, and strategic planning—essential for high-level administrative positions.

For those drawn to finance and analytics, pursuing an accounting degree online cost can be a cost-effective pathway to roles in auditing, taxation, and corporate accounting.

With technology reshaping business operations, an ai degree online opens doors to data-driven careers in business analytics, automation, and innovation management.

Exploring these affordable online degrees not only broadens career choices but also provides specialized skills sought after by employers worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Janet R. McColl-Kennedy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles