World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2709 2482 1557 1393 204 16268

M. David Rudd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. David Rudd between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. David Rudd published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 22 of the 242 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 20 publications
1974 2025

242 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. David Rudd: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 4
1995 7
1996 10
1997 7
1998 6
1999 8
2000 6
2001 6
2002 3
2003 3
2004 10
2005 6
2006 13
2007 2
2008 8
2009 14
2010 7
2011 6
2012 7
2013 10
2014 5
2015 9
2016 5
2017 5
2018 6
2019 3
2020 8
2021 10
2022 7
2023 3
2024 2
2025 20
Total 242
Download as CSV

M. David Rudd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. David Rudd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 204 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 204
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

M. David Rudd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. David Rudd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

M. David Rudd is affiliated with the University of Memphis in the United States. Their work primarily encompasses the fields of psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on clinical psychology and social psychology. Additional areas of study include psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects within mental health and behavioral studies. Key topics include suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, posttraumatic stress disorder research, traumatic brain injury research, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Among their frequent coauthors are Craig J. Bryan, Gretchen J. Diefenbach, David F. Tolin, and Jessica Stubbing.

Their publications appear regularly in prominent venues focused on psychiatry and clinical trials. Frequent publication venues include Frontiers in Psychiatry, Contemporary Clinical Trials, JAMA Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, and Psychological Medicine.

Their recent papers include:

  • The Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale: Development and Clinical Application, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Using Machine Learning to Predict Suicide Attempts in Military Personnel, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicidal Inpatients, 2024, JAMA Psychiatry
  • STRONG STAR and the Consortium to Alleviate PTSD: Shaping the future of combat PTSD and related conditions in military and veteran populations, 2021, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • The role of depression and suicidal cognitions as contributors to suicide risk among active duty soldiers reporting symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

M. David Rudd has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a work published by Psychiatrie Verlag eBooks titled Brief-CBT zur Suizidprävention, scheduled for 2025.

Best Publications

  • Main predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior: empirical tests in two samples of young adults.

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;Kimberly A. Van Orden;Tracy K. Witte;Edward A. Selby

  • Warning Signs for Suicide: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications.

    M. David Rudd;Alan L. Berman;Thomas E. Joiner;Matthew K. Nock

  • The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: Guidance for Working with Suicidal Clients

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;Kimberly A. Van Orden;Tracy K. Witte;M. David Rudd

  • Fluid Vulnerability Theory: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding the Process of Acute and Chronic Suicide Risk.

    M. David Rudd

  • Four studies on how past and current suicidality relate even when "everything but the kitchen sink" is covaried.

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;Yeates Conwell;Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick;Tracy K. Witte

  • Advances in the assessment of suicide risk.

    Craig J. Bryan;M. David Rudd

  • Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Effects on Post-Treatment Suicide Attempts in a Military Sample: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial With 2-Year Follow-Up

    M. David Rudd;Craig J. Bryan;Evelyn G. Wertenberger;Alan L. Peterson

  • Relationships among suicide ideators, attempters, and multiple attempters in a young-adult sample.

    M. D. Rudd;Thomas E. Joiner;M. H. Rajab

  • Predictive and treatment validity of life satisfaction and the quality of life inventory.

    Michael B. Frisch;Michelle P. Clark;Steven V. Rouse;M. David Rudd

  • Perceived Burdensomeness And Suicidality: Two Studies On The Suicide Notes Of Those Attempting And Those Completing Suicide

    Thomas E. Joiner;Jeremy W. Pettit;Rheeda L. Walker;Zachary R. Voelz

  • The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students

    M. David Rudd

  • Treating suicidal behavior : an effective, time-limited approach

    M. David Rudd;Thomas E. Joiner;M. Hasan Rajab

  • Scientizing and routinizing the assessment of suicidality in outpatient practice.

    Thomas E. Joiner;Rheeda L. Walker;M. David Rudd;David A. Jobes

  • Sleep Problems Outperform Depression and Hopelessness as Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Predictors of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Young Adults in the Military

    Jessica D. Ribeiro;James L. Pease;Peter M. Gutierrez;Caroline Silva

  • Student veterans: A national survey exploring psychological symptoms and suicide risk.

    M. David Rudd;Jeffrey Goulding;Craig J. Bryan

  • Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in U.S. Army Soldiers: A randomized clinical trial ☆

    Craig J. Bryan;Jim Mintz;Tracy A. Clemans;Bruce Leeson

  • Intensity and duration of suicidal crises vary as a function of previous suicide attempts and negative life events.

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;M. David Rudd

  • Worst-point suicidal plans: a dimension of suicidality predictive of past suicide attempts and eventual death by suicide.

    Thomas E Joiner;Robert A Steer;Gregory Brown;Aaron T Beck

  • Effectiveness of an outpatient intervention targeting suicidal young adults : Preliminary results

    M. D. Rudd;M. H. Rajab;David T. Orman;Thomas E. Joiner

  • Overcoming the fear of lethal injury: evaluating suicidal behavior in the military through the lens of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide.

    Edward A. Selby;Michael D. Anestis;Theodore W. Bender;Jessica D. Ribeiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Kimberly A. Van Orden
Kimberly A. Van Orden University of Rochester Medical Center
Tracy K. Witte
Tracy K. Witte Auburn University
David A. Jobes
David A. Jobes Catholic University of America
Jeremy W. Pettit
Jeremy W. Pettit Florida International University
Peter M. Gutierrez
Peter M. Gutierrez Florida State University
Jessica D. Ribeiro
Jessica D. Ribeiro Florida State University
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
Norman B. Schmidt
Norman B. Schmidt Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens many career pathways, from clinical practice to research or social services. Today, there are numerous flexible education options to fit your needs and lifestyle. If you’re looking to maximize the value of your degree, consider exploring the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in America to find top-rated institutions with strong outcomes.

For those based in Florida, especially around Tampa, examining the best value psychology programs in Tampa can help you make a smart and affordable choice.

Interested in careers involving direct support or advocacy? Social work is a closely-related field with strong online learning options. Check out the best online social work bachelor’s programs in the US or narrow your search within specific regions, such as the top online social work programs in California.

By exploring related online degrees, you can align your education with your goals and access flexible pathways to meaningful careers in psychology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing M. David Rudd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles