World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19078 17919 808 764 290 22498

Aslam H. Anis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aslam H. Anis between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aslam H. Anis published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2008. 9 of the 314 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2008. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

314 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aslam H. Anis: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 4
1997 2
1998 8
1999 3
2000 10
2001 7
2002 9
2003 9
2004 10
2005 9
2006 13
2007 14
2008 19
2009 19
2010 16
2011 15
2012 14
2013 12
2014 10
2015 11
2016 10
2017 12
2018 8
2019 13
2020 6
2021 8
2022 11
2023 9
2024 9
2025 8
2026 1
Total 314
Download as CSV

Aslam H. Anis publications per year - data summary

  • Aslam H. Anis, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, has 314 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2008 and 2009, with 19 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 35 years in the span carries no publications at all (1993).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.2 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 38 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 57 publications (4.8 per year); 2004-2015: 162 publications (13.5 per year); 2016-2026: 95 publications (8.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Aslam H. Anis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aslam H. Anis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 290 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 290
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Aslam H. Anis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Aslam H. Anis, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, records 290 publications - the 15th percentile of the discipline.
  • 15% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Aslam H. Anis, and about 85% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Aslam H. Anis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Aslam H. Anis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aslam H. Anis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Aslam H. Anis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Aslam H. Anis, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, records 75 D-Index - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Aslam H. Anis, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Aslam H. Anis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Aslam H. Anis is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a focus on Infectious Diseases, Economics and Econometrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health, and Virology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • HIV Research and Treatment

Recent publications by Aslam H. Anis highlight research related to osteoarthritis and COVID-19 vaccine immunology in people living with HIV. Selected papers include:

  • Descriptive Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis in British Columbia, Canada (2020) published in PubMed
  • Humoral immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in people living with HIV receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (2022) published in npj Vaccines
  • People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Receiving Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy Show Typical Antibody Durability After Dual Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Strong Third Dose Responses (2022) published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity in people with HIV (2022) published in AIDS
  • Humoral immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in people living with HIV receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy (2021) published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Cecilia T. Costiniuk, Curtis Cooper, Mark Hull, Ann N. Burchell, and Zabrina L. Brumme.

Aslam H. Anis contributes regularly to the following publication venues, reflecting the focus areas of their research:

  • AIDS
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Value in Health

Best Publications

  • The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Daphne P Guh;Wei Zhang;Nick Bansback;Zubin Amarsi

  • The cost of obesity in Canada

    C L Birmingham;J L Muller;A Palepu;J J Spinelli

  • Therapies for active rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate failure

    James R. O'Dell;Ted R. Mikuls;Thomas H. Taylor;Vandana Ahluwalia

  • A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis

    Carlo A. Marra;John C. Woolcott;Jacek A. Kopec;Kamran Shojania

  • Diacetylmorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid addiction.

    Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes;Suzanne Brissette;David C. Marsh;Pierre Lauzon

  • A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Erik Andrew;Aslam Anis;Tom Chalmers;Mildred Cho

  • Obesity and overweight in Canada: an updated cost‐of‐illness study

    A. H. Anis;A. H. Anis;W. Zhang;N. Bansback;D. P. Guh

  • Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: A critical review.

    Wei Zhang;Nick Bansback;Aslam H. Anis

  • Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications.

    Mirella De Civita;Dean Regier;Abul H. Alamgir;Aslam H. Anis;Aslam H. Anis

  • Hospital utilization and costs in a cohort of injection drug users

    Anita Palepu;Mark W. Tyndall;Hector Leon;Jennifer Muller

  • Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.

    Nick Bansback;John Brazier;Aki Tsuchiya;Aslam Anis;Aslam Anis

  • Validity of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire - general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Wei Zhang;Wei Zhang;Nick Bansback;Annelies Boonen;Adam Young

  • Gaps in care for rheumatoid arthritis: A population study

    Diane Lacaille;Aslam H. Anis;Daphne P. Guh;John M. Esdaile

  • Canadian Valuation of EQ-5D Health States: Preliminary Value Set and Considerations for Future Valuation Studies

    Nick Bansback;Aki Tsuchiya;John Brazier;Aslam Anis;Aslam Anis

  • The indirect costs of arthritis resulting from unemployment, reduced performance, and occupational changes while at work.

    Xin Li;Monique A M Gignac;Aslam H Anis

  • Hydromorphone Compared With Diacetylmorphine for Long-term Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes;Daphne Guh;Suzanne Brissette;Kirsten Marchand;Kirsten Marchand

  • Use of nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

    Diane Lacaille;Daphne P. Guh;Michal Abrahamowicz;Aslam H. Anis

  • Propofol vs Midazolam for ICU Sedation: A Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Richard I. Hall;Dean Sandham;Pierre Cardinal;Martin Tweeddale

  • Practical pharmacogenetics: the cost effectiveness of screening for thiopurine s-methyltransferase polymorphisms in patients with rheumatological conditions treated with azathioprine.

    Carlo A Marra;John M Esdaile;Aslam H Anis

  • Measuring worker productivity: frameworks and measures.

    Dorcas Beaton;Claire Bombardier;Reuben Escorpizo;Wei Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin T. Schechter
Martin T. Schechter University of British Columbia
Michael Krausz
Michael Krausz University of British Columbia
Robert S. Hogg
Robert S. Hogg Simon Fraser University
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy University of California, San Francisco
John Brazier
John Brazier University of Sheffield
Mark Holodniy
Mark Holodniy Stanford University
Julio S. G. Montaner
Julio S. G. Montaner University of British Columbia
Bruno Fautrel
Bruno Fautrel Université Paris Cité
John J. Spinelli
John J. Spinelli University of British Columbia
Aki Tsuchiya
Aki Tsuchiya University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA can begin with a variety of online degree pathways. One popular route is enrolling in an online nursing school. These programs provide flexibility for students balancing work and study while preparing for essential healthcare roles.

Those who want to elevate their careers might consider pursuing advanced practice degrees. For instance, the cheapest dnp online program options can make it more affordable to qualify for leadership and specialized nursing positions. Similarly, registered nurses looking to further their education may want to review the average cost of rn to bsn programs to find budget-friendly options that advance their qualifications.

For those without a nursing background but seeking to enter the field quickly, there are direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These accelerated tracks help career changers enter nursing with a master's degree. Each path offers different timelines, costs, and career potential, allowing aspiring healthcare professionals to choose the best fit for their ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Aslam H. Anis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles