World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
35
Citations
6626
World Ranking
5034
National Ranking
1230

James Nienhuis publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Nienhuis sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 131 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

James Nienhuis D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Nienhuis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Molecular microbial diversity of an agricultural soil in Wisconsin.

    J Borneman;P W Skroch;K M O'Sullivan;J A Palus

  • Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

    T Helentjaris;M Slocum;S Wright;A Schaefer

  • Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD.

    S. Beebe;P. W. Skroch;J. Tohme;M. C. Duque

  • Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 4. Development of a core linkage map and alignment of RFLP maps

    R. Freyre;P. W. Skroch;V. Geffroy;A.-F. Adam-Blondon

  • Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Loci Associated with Insect Resistance in Tomato 1

    James Nienhuis;Tim Helentjaris;Mary Slocum;Bill Ruggero

  • Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water use efficiency in tomato.

    Bjorn Martin;James Nienhuis;Gretchen King;Alison Schaefer

  • Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data

    Mitrick A. Johns;Paul W. Skroch;James Nienhuis;Patricio Hinrichsen

  • Variation among and within Capsicum species revealed by RAPD markers

    J. M. Rodriguez;T. Berke;L. Engle;J. Nienhuis

  • Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes.

    P W Skroch;J Nienhuis

  • MOLECULAR MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH PLANT ARCHITECTURE AND RESISTANCE TO COMMON BLIGHT, WEB BLIGHT, AND RUST IN COMMON BEANS

    Geunhwa Jung;Dermot P. Coyne;Paul W. Skroch;James Nienhuis

  • Combining Ability Analyses and Relationships Among Yield, Yield Components, and Architectural Traits in Dry Bean1

    James Nienhuis;Shree P. Singh

  • Genetic Relationships among Cultivars and Landraces of Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) as Measured by RAPD Markers

    James Nienhuis;Jan Tivang;Paul Skroch;Joao B. dos Santos

  • Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potatoe )

    D. M. Spooner;J. Tivang;J. Nienhuis;J. T. Miller

  • Trifolitoxin Production Increases Nodulation Competitiveness of Rhizobium etli CE3 under Agricultural Conditions

    Eduardo A. Robleto;Kenneth Kmiecik;Edward S. Oplinger;James Nienhuis

  • Development of an algorithm identifying maximally diverse core collections.

    Jane M. Marita;Julie M. Rodriguez;James Nienhuis

  • Comparison of Mexican Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Core and Reserve Germplasm Collections

    Paul W. Skroch;James Nienhuis;Steve Beebe;Joseph Tohme

  • Genetic Variation among Tomato Accessions from Primary and Secondary Centers of Diversity

    J. Villand;P. W. Skroch;T. Lai;P. Hanson

  • Genetics of Seed Yield and its Components in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American Origin. II. Genetic Variance, Heritability and Expected Response from Selection

    J. Nienhuis;S. P. Singh

  • Effects of photoperiod and vernalization on the number of leaves at flowering in 32 Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) ecotypes

    Björn H. Karlsson;Gavin R. Sills;James Nienhuis

  • Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for central America

    Stephen E. Beebe;Ivan Ochoa;Paul W. Skroch;James Nienhuis

  • Collapse of morphological species in the wild potato Solanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae: sect. Petota).

    R Vandenberg;J Miller;M Ugarte;J Kardolus

  • Molecular-marker-based Genetic Analysis of Tepary Bean-derived Common Bacterial Blight Resistance in Different Developmental Stages of Common Bean

    Geunhwa Jung;Paul W. Skroch;Dermot P. Coyne;James Nienhuis

  • Confirmation of QTL Associated with Common Bacterial Blight Resistance in Four Different Genetic Backgrounds in Common Bean

    G. Jung;P. W. Skroch;J. Nienhuis;D. P. Coyne

  • Effects of Location and Plant Density on Yield and Architectural Traits in Dry Beans1

    James Nienhuis;Shree P. Singh

  • Mapping of QTL for Seed Size and Shape Traits in Common Bean

    Soon O. Park;Dermot P. Coyne;Geunhwa Jung;Paul W. Skroch

Frequent Co-Authors

Dermot P. Coyne
Dermot P. Coyne University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Jiwan P. Palta
Jiwan P. Palta University of Wisconsin–Madison
Paul C. Bethke
Paul C. Bethke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Shree P. Singh
Shree P. Singh University of Idaho
James R. Steadman
James R. Steadman University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Joe Tohme
Joe Tohme Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Shawn M. Kaeppler
Shawn M. Kaeppler University of Wisconsin–Madison
James S. Beaver
James S. Beaver University of Puerto Rico
Eric W. Triplett
Eric W. Triplett University of Florida
Stephen E. Beebe
Stephen E. Beebe Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James Nienhuis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles