World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert C. Griffiths

Robert C. Griffiths

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
41
Citations
8159
World Ranking
1888
National Ranking
46

Robert C. Griffiths publications per year

1969: 1 publications 1970: 1 publications 1971: 1 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 1 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publications
1969 2026

155 publications in total across all disciplines

Robert C. Griffiths publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 128 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Robert C. Griffiths D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Robert C. Griffiths is affiliated with Monash University in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, predominantly focusing on Mathematics as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work covers several subfields, including Mathematical Physics, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Statistics and Probability.

The main topics in Griffiths' research include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models, Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models, Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension, Theoretical and Computational Physics, and Diffusion and Search Dynamics.

Griffiths has contributed to various publication venues where they have multiple papers. These venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Hypertension
  • Kidney360
  • Theoretical Population Biology
  • Journal of Theoretical Probability

Several papers highlight the scope of their recent work:

  • "Angiotensin II enhances bacterial clearance via myeloid signaling in a murine sepsis model," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 7 Exacerbates Hypertension Through Effects on T Lymphocyte Trafficking," 2020, Hypertension
  • "Soluble ACE2 Is Filtered into the Urine," 2022, Kidney360
  • "Coalescence and sampling distributions for Feller diffusions," 2023, Theoretical Population Biology
  • "A universal approach to matching marginals and sums," 2020, Electronic Communications in Probability

Frequent collaborators in Griffiths' research include Conrad J. Burden, Andrea Collevecchio, Steven D. Crowley, Jamie R. Privratsky, and Xiaohan Lu.

Robert C. Griffiths was awarded the designation of Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Inferring Coalescence Times From DNA Sequence Data

    Simon Tavare;David J Balding;Robert C Griffiths;Peter Donnelly

  • Sampling Theory for Neutral Alleles in a Varying Environment

    R. C. Griffiths;Simon Tavare

  • Ancestral inference from samples of DNA sequences with recombination.

    R.C. Griffiths;P. Marjoram

  • Ancestral Inference in Population Genetics

    R. C. Griffiths;Simon Tavare

  • An ancestral recombination graph

    Robert C. Griffiths;Paul Marjoram

  • Simulating Probability Distributions in the Coalescent

    R.C. Griffiths;S. Tavare

  • The age of a mutation in a general coalescent tree

    R.C. Griffiths;Simon Tavaré

  • Inference from gene trees in a subdivided population.

    M. Bahlo;R.C. Griffiths

  • Bounds on the minimum number of recombination events in a sample history.

    Simon R Myers;Robert C Griffiths

  • Lines of descent in the diffusion approximation of neutral Wright-Fisher models.

    R.C. Griffiths

  • High levels of Y-chromosome nucleotide diversity in the genus Pan.

    Anne C. Stone;Robert C. Griffiths;Stephen L. Zegura;Michael F. Hammer

  • The Transition Function of a Fleming-Viot Process

    S. N. Ethier;R. C. Griffiths

  • Importance sampling on coalescent histories. I

    Maria De Iorio;Robert C. Griffiths

  • Unrooted genealogical tree probabilities in the infinitely-many-sites model

    R.C. Griffiths;Simon Tavaré

  • The frequency spectrum of a mutation, and its age, in a general diffusion model.

    R.C. Griffiths

  • A transition density expansion for a multi-allele diffusion model

    R. C. Griffiths

  • The Two-Locus Ancestral Graph

    Robert C. Griffiths

  • The Infinitely-Many-Sites Model as a Measure-Valued Diffusion

    S. N. Ethier;R. C. Griffiths

  • On the two-locus sampling distribution

    S. N. Ethier;R. C. Griffiths

  • Orthogonal Polynomials on the Multinomial Distribution

    R. C. Griffiths

  • Importance sampling on coalescent histories. II: Subdivided population models

    Maria De Iorio;Robert C. Griffiths

  • A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection.

    A.M. Etheridge;R.C. Griffiths

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Tavaré
Simon Tavaré Columbia University
Persi Diaconis
Persi Diaconis Stanford University
Peter Donnelly
Peter Donnelly University of Oxford
Michael F. Hammer
Michael F. Hammer University of Arizona
Taane G. Clark
Taane G. Clark London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Melanie Bahlo
Melanie Bahlo Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
John B. Clegg
John B. Clegg John Radcliffe Hospital
David J. Balding
David J. Balding University of Melbourne
Gil McVean
Gil McVean University of Oxford
Alan R. Templeton
Alan R. Templeton Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in mathematics, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways in fields like finance, business, and marketing. Many opt for an online masters in finance to apply their quantitative skills in investment analysis, risk management, and financial planning.

Business professionals often find value in earning the fastest online MBA degree programs, which allow for accelerated learning and a quicker transition into leadership roles. If budget and time are primary concerns, exploring the shortest online mba options can provide a cost-effective and time-efficient solution.

Marketing is another area where a strong mathematical foundation is beneficial. Programs like the marketing graduate programs offer a combination of analytics and creative strategy that prepares graduates for high-demand roles.

Additionally, students seeking comprehensive business education in a condensed format can consider the cheapest 1 year online mba programs, which blend affordability and accelerated degree completion to enhance career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Robert C. Griffiths

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles