World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8372 7868 320 305 321 28129

Mark W. Tyndall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Tyndall between 1982 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Tyndall published across 41 years, from 1982 to 2022, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2006. 6 of the 323 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2006. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications
1982 2022

323 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Tyndall: publications per year, 1982 to 2022
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 6
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 6
2002 14
2003 20
2004 10
2005 20
2006 24
2007 24
2008 24
2009 12
2010 13
2011 12
2012 3
2013 8
2014 7
2015 11
2016 13
2017 14
2018 19
2019 19
2020 15
2021 4
2022 2
Total 323
Download as CSV

Mark W. Tyndall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Tyndall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 321
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Tyndall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Tyndall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark W. Tyndall is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hepatology, General Health Professions, and Infectious Diseases. The subfields highlight a broad engagement with health-related disciplines and disease studies.

The scientist has contributed to research on several interconnected health topics, including:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Mark W. Tyndall's recent scholarly outputs cover critical subjects related to opioid use, substance abuse, and overlapping public health crises. Notable papers include:

  • "Safer opioid distribution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "How Structural Violence, Prohibition, and Stigma Have Paralyzed North American Responses to Opioid Overdose," 2020, The AMA Journal of Ethic

Additional important research associated with coauthors but where Tyndall is not primary author involves studies on opioid use disorder and syndemics involving HIV, Hepatitis C, overdose, and COVID-19:

  • "Opioid use disorder," 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Addressing the Syndemic of HIV, Hepatitis C, Overdose, and COVID-19 Among People Who Use Drugs: The Potential Roles for Decriminalization and Safe Supply," 2020, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • "Correlations between opioid mortality increases related to illicit/synthetic opioids and reductions of medical opioid dispensing - exploratory analyses from Canada," 2020, BMC Public Health

The researcher regularly collaborates with a group of scholars, including Claire Kendall, Lisa M. Boucher, Alana Martin, Zack Marshall, and Rob Boyd, each of whom has worked with Tyndall on at least four occasions. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • International Journal of Drug Policy
  • The AMA Journal of Ethic

Mark W. Tyndall's work encompasses a multidisciplinary approach to public health challenges related to substance use, infectious diseases, and social determinants of health, as evidenced by the variety of research topics, venues, and collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review

    Bradley M Mathers;Louisa Degenhardt;Louisa Degenhardt;Benjamin Phillips;Lucas Wiessing

  • The case for expanding access to highly active antiretroviral therapy to curb the growth of the HIV epidemic

    Julio S. G. Montaner;Robert Hogg;Evan Wood;Thomas Kerr

  • Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work

    Kate Shannon;Thomas Kerr;Shari Allinott;Jill Chettiar

  • Opioid use disorder.

    John Strang;John Strang;Nora D. Volkow;Louisa Degenhardt;Matthew Hickman

  • Intensive injection cocaine use as the primary risk factor in the Vancouver HIV-1 epidemic.

    Mark W Tyndall;Sue Currie;Patricia Spittal;Kathy Li

  • Prevalence and structural correlates of gender based violence among a prospective cohort of female sex workers.

    Kate Shannon;Thomas Kerr;Steffanie A. Strathdee;Jean Shoveller

  • Structural and Environmental Barriers to Condom Use Negotiation With Clients Among Female Sex Workers: Implications for HIV-Prevention Strategies and Policy

    Kate Shannon;Steffanie A. Strathdee;Jean Shoveller;Melanie Rusch

  • Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users

    Thomas Kerr;Thomas Kerr;Mark Tyndall;Mark Tyndall;Kathy Li;Kathy Li;Julio Montaner;Julio Montaner

  • Occupational stigma as a primary barrier to health care for street-based sex workers in Canada

    Lisa Lazarus;Kathleen N Deering;Rose Nabess;Kate Gibson

  • Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users

    Evan Wood;Thomas Kerr;Will Small;Kathy Li

  • Hospital utilization and costs in a cohort of injection drug users

    Anita Palepu;Mark W. Tyndall;Hector Leon;Jennifer Muller

  • Predictors of non-fatal overdose among a cohort of polysubstance-using injection drug users.

    Thomas Kerr;Thomas Kerr;Nadia Fairbairn;Mark Tyndall;Mark Tyndall;David Marsh;David Marsh

  • Mapping violence and policing as an environmental-structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work

    Kate Shannon;M. Rusch;Jean Shoveller;D. Alexson

  • Incidence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users during an outbreak of HIV infection

    David M. Patrick;Mark W. Tyndall;Peter G.A. Cornelisse;Kathy Li

  • Risk factors for elevated HIV incidence rates among female injection drug users in Vancouver

    Patricia M. Spittal;Kevin J.P. Craib;Evan Wood;Nancy Laliberté

  • Routes of administration for cannabis use – basic prevalence and related health outcomes: A scoping review and synthesis

    Cayley Russell;Sergio Rueda;Sergio Rueda;Robin Room;Robin Room;Mark Tyndall

  • Unsafe injection practices in a cohort of injection drug users in Vancouver: Could safer injecting rooms help?

    Evan Wood;Mark W. Tyndall;Patricia M. Spittal;Kathy Li

  • Adherence and plasma HIV RNA responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1 infected injection drug users

    Evan Wood;Julio S.G. Montaner;Benita Yip;Mark W. Tyndall

  • Risk factors for elevated HIV incidence among Aboriginal injection drug users in Vancouver

    Kevin J.P. Craib;Patricia M. Spittal;Evan Wood;Nancy Laliberte

  • Structural andEnvironmentalBarriers toCondomUse NegotiationWithClientsAmongFemale SexWorkers: ImplicationsforHIV-PreventionStrategiesandPolicy

    Kate Shannon;Steffanie A. Strathdee;Jean Shoveller;Melanie Rusch

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan Wood
Evan Wood University of British Columbia
Julio S. G. Montaner
Julio S. G. Montaner University of British Columbia
Thomas Kerr
Thomas Kerr University of British Columbia
Robert S. Hogg
Robert S. Hogg Simon Fraser University
Mel Krajden
Mel Krajden University of British Columbia
Martin T. Schechter
Martin T. Schechter University of British Columbia
Benedikt Fischer
Benedikt Fischer University of Auckland
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy
Michael V. O'Shaughnessy University of California, San Francisco
Kate Shannon
Kate Shannon University of British Columbia
Patricia M. Spittal
Patricia M. Spittal University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are numerous related online degree and career options that can help you enter the healthcare field quickly and affordably. Programs such as lpn program options cater to those looking for a fast entry into nursing, offering flexible schedules for working students.

Beyond entry-level roles, advancing your career is possible through bsn to np programs online, which prepare nurses for higher responsibility and increased earning potential, often in specialized fields like psychiatric mental health.

For those interested in the management side of healthcare, consider the healthcare administration degree cost to determine the most budget-friendly paths for advancing into leadership roles. You can also explore some of the cheapest mha online programs to gain a master's qualification without breaking the bank.

Whether you want to work directly with patients or oversee healthcare operations, these online degrees offer flexible and accessible pathways to a variety of rewarding careers in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Tyndall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles