World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark Paskevicius

Mark Paskevicius

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 43 6107 5888 325 320 131 8080

Mark Paskevicius publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Paskevicius between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Paskevicius published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 16 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Paskevicius: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 5
2010 3
2011 11
2012 13
2013 8
2014 5
2015 6
2016 8
2017 10
2018 18
2019 12
2020 19
2021 24
2022 10
2023 12
2024 11
2025 5
Total 183
Download as CSV

Mark Paskevicius publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Paskevicius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386 131
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Paskevicius D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Paskevicius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380 43
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Paskevicius is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia, where they contribute to the fields of Materials Science and Engineering. Their research work spans a wide range of topics primarily focused on hydrogen storage and materials, adsorption and cooling systems, crystallization and solubility studies, as well as chemical looping and thermochemical processes.

Over the course of their career, Paskevicius has published extensively in several key subfields including materials chemistry, mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, and inorganic chemistry. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach within scientific research, combining elements of chemistry and engineering to address energy storage and material properties.

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • Magnesium- and intermetallic alloys-based hydrides for energy storage: modelling, synthesis and properties (2022, Progress in Energy)
  • Hydrogen storage in complex hydrides: past activities and new trends (2022, Progress in Energy)
  • Inexpensive thermochemical energy storage utilising additive enhanced limestone (2020, Journal of Materials Chemistry A)
  • Metallic and complex hydride-based electrochemical storage of energy (2022, Progress in Energy)
  • Insights into the mechanism of tar reforming using biochar as a catalyst (2021, Fuel)

Paskevicius frequently publishes in venues such as The Cambridge Structural Database, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, and Progress in Energy. The breadth of these venues underscores a strong emphasis on both fundamental and applied research in materials and energy sciences.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Paskevicius's work, with frequent coauthors including Craig E. Buckley, Terry D. Humphries, Torben R. Jensen, Kasper T. Møller, and Young-Su Lee. These collaborative efforts contribute to a diversified research output and interdisciplinary knowledge exchange.

Main topics in Paskevicius's research portfolio are:

  • Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
  • Advancements in Battery Materials

This profile reflects an active research presence in areas related to energy storage materials, the chemistry of hydrides, and thermal and electrochemical processes. The multidisciplinary and collaborative nature of Paskevicius's work aligns with ongoing developments in sustainable energy and material sciences.

Best Publications

  • Materials for hydrogen-based energy storage – past, recent progress and future outlook

    Michael Hirscher;Volodymyr A. Yartys;Marcello Baricco;Jose Bellosta von Colbe

  • Magnesium based materials for hydrogen based energy storage: Past, present and future

    V. A. Yartys;M. V. Lototskyy;E. Akiba;R. Albert

  • Metal borohydrides and derivatives – synthesis, structure and properties

    Mark Paskevicius;Lars Haarh Jepsen;Pascal Schouwink;Radovan Černý

  • Hydrogen Storage Materials for Mobile and Stationary Applications: Current State of the Art

    Qiwen Lai;Mark Paskevicius;Mark Paskevicius;Drew A. Sheppard;Craig E. Buckley

  • Thermodynamic changes in mechanochemically synthesized magnesium hydride nanoparticles.

    Mark Paskevicius;Drew A Sheppard;Craig E Buckley

  • Concentrating Solar Thermal Heat Storage Using Metal Hydrides

    D. N. Harries;M. Paskevicius;D. A. Sheppard;T. E. C. Price

  • Structure and Hydrogenation Properties of a HfNbTiVZr High-Entropy Alloy.

    Dennis Karlsson;Gustav Ek;Johan Cedervall;Claudia Zlotea

  • Metal boranes: Progress and applications

    Bjarne R.S. Hansen;Mark Paskevicius;Hai Wen Li;Hai Wen Li;Etsuo Akiba;Etsuo Akiba

  • Role of O-containing functional groups in biochar during the catalytic steam reforming of tar using the biochar as a catalyst

    Yurong Liu;Mark Paskevicius;Hongqi Wang;Gordon Parkinson

  • Thermal Stability of Li2B12H12 and its Role in the Decomposition of LiBH4

    Mark P. Pitt;Mark Paskevicius;David H. Brown;Drew A. Sheppard

  • Metal hydride thermal heat storage prototype for concentrating solar thermal power

    M. Paskevicius;M. Paskevicius;Drew Sheppard;K. Williamson;Craig Buckley

  • Eutectic melting in metal borohydrides

    Mark Paskevicius;Morten Brix Ley;Morten Brix Ley;Drew A. Sheppard;Torben René Jensen

  • Future perspectives of thermal energy storage with metal hydrides

    Kandavel Manickam;Priyen Mistry;Gavin Walker;David Grant

  • Metal hydrides for concentrating solar thermal power energy storage

    D. A. Sheppard;M. Paskevicius;T. D. Humphries;M. Felderhoff

  • First-order phase transition in the Li2B12H12 system

    Mark Paskevicius;Mark P. Pitt;David H. Brown;Drew A. Sheppard

  • Thermodynamics of Hydrogen Desorption from NaMgH3 and Its Application As a Solar Heat Storage Medium

    Drew A. Sheppard;Mark Paskevicius;Craig E. Buckley

  • In-Situ X-ray Diffraction Study of γ-Mg(BH4)2 Decomposition

    Mark Paskevicius;Mark P. Pitt;Colin J. Webb;Drew A. Sheppard

  • The synthesis of nanoscopic Ti based alloys and their effects on the MgH2 system compared with the MgH2 + 0.01Nb2O5 benchmark

    Mark Pitt;Mark Pitt;Mark Paskevicius;C. Webb;Drew Sheppard

  • Complex and liquid hydrides for energy storage

    Elsa Callini;Elsa Callini;Zuleyha Özlem Kocabas Atakli;Bjørn C. Hauback;Shin ichi Orimo

  • Concentrating Solar Thermal Heat Storage Using Metal Hydrides This paper looks at the current status of solar thermal heat storage systems using metal hydrides that, despite the technical challenges, are now seeing development because of their potential advantages as well as possible fast-track commercialization.

    David N. Harries;Mark Paskevicius;Drew A. Sheppard;Tobias Edward Cameron Price

Frequent Co-Authors

Torben R. Jensen
Torben R. Jensen Aarhus University
John C. Walmsley
John C. Walmsley University of Cambridge
Martin Dornheim
Martin Dornheim University of Nottingham
Bjørn C. Hauback
Bjørn C. Hauback University of Oslo
Randi Holmestad
Randi Holmestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology
David M. Grant
David M. Grant University of Nottingham
Michael Felderhoff
Michael Felderhoff Max Planck Society
Kondo-Francois Aguey-Zinsou
Kondo-Francois Aguey-Zinsou University of New South Wales
Thomas Klassen
Thomas Klassen Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Andreas Züttel
Andreas Züttel École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and emerging career pathways. Many students are discovering the value of interdisciplinary studies that combine technology with management, finance, and urban design.

For those looking to complement their technical skills with leadership, is project management a good degree? Project management provides a solid foundation for engineers aiming to step into management roles and lead complex technical projects.

The tech landscape is also rapidly evolving with new sectors like blockchain and fintech. Students interested in cutting-edge innovations can explore blockchain degree programs to gain expertise in digital currencies, decentralized finance, and cryptography.

Engineering is also making an impact in fields not traditionally associated with technology, such as sports. Programs like the online sports management degree combine analytics, operations, and technology to help manage sports teams and facilities.

Lastly, with urbanization on the rise, there’s a growing demand for tech-savvy city planners. Graduates can look into the urban planning online degree to pursue careers that blend engineering, policy, and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Paskevicius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles