World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
6922
World Ranking
7017
National Ranking
3794

L. Stephen Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Stephen Miller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

L. Stephen Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Stephen Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

L. Stephen Miller is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their work predominantly falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research covers a range of topics such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, Frailty in Older Adults, Sports Injuries and Prevention, and Personality Traits and Psychology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, Clinical Gerontologist, Neuropsychology Review, Neurobiology of Aging, and the Journal of Physical Activity and Health.

Coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Miller include Talia L. Robinson, Marissa A. Gogniat, Kharine R. Jean, Julianne D. Schmidt, and Michelle L. Weber Rawlins.

Notable recent papers authored by Miller include:

  • Frailty and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies, 2021, Neuropsychology Review
  • Exercise interventions do not impact brain volume change in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Examination of collegiate student-athlete concussion reporting intentions and behavior, 2020, Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
  • Coach, sports medicine, and parent influence on concussion care seeking intentions and behaviors in collegiate student-athletes, 2020, Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
  • A Multi-method Investigation of the Personality Correlates of Functional Ability in Older Adults, 2020, Clinical Gerontologist

Best Publications

  • Risk Factors for Potentially Harmful Informal Caregiver Behavior

    Scott R. Beach;Richard Schulz;Gail M. Williamson;L. Stephen Miller

  • Dose-response relationship between light irradiance and the suppression of plasma melatonin in human volunteers.

    George C. Brainard;Alfred J. Lewy;Michael Menaker;Richard H. Fredrickson

  • Executive function mechanisms of theory of mind.

    Fayeza S. Ahmed;L. Stephen Miller

  • Relationship between Serum and Brain Carotenoids, α-Tocopherol, and Retinol Concentrations and Cognitive Performance in the Oldest Old from the Georgia Centenarian Study.

    Elizabeth J. Johnson;Rohini Vishwanathan;Mary Ann Johnson;Dorothy B. Hausman

  • Increased activation of the anterior cingulate cortex during processing of disgust faces in individuals with social phobia

    Nader Amir;Heide Klumpp;Jason Elias;Jeffrey S. Bedwell

  • Prevalence, trends, and factors associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy among Medicaid-eligible schizophrenia patients, 1998-2000.

    Rahul Ganguly;Jeffrey A. Kotzan;L. Stephen Miller;Klugh Kennedy

  • Functional Disability in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Cutter A Lindbergh;Rodney K Dishman;L Stephen Miller

  • Depression and quality of informal care: a longitudinal investigation of caregiving stressors.

    G. Rush Smith;Gail M. Williamson;L. Stephen Miller;Richard Schulz

  • DICCCOL: Dense Individualized and Common Connectivity-Based Cortical Landmarks

    Dajiang Zhu;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li;Lei Guo;Xi Jiang

  • Cognitive Interventions for Cognitively Healthy, Mildly Impaired, and Mixed Samples of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

    Catherine M Mewborn;Cutter A Lindbergh;L Stephen Miller

  • Gender and impulsivity differences in licit substance use

    Tracy L. Waldeck;L.Stephen Miller

  • Age-related decrements in performance on a brief continuous performance test

    Tanja M. Mani;Jeffrey S. Bedwell;L. Stephen Miller

  • Axonal Fiber Terminations Concentrate on Gyri

    Jingxin Nie;Lei Guo;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li;Yonghua Wang

  • Effects of Lutein/Zeaxanthin Supplementation on the Cognitive Function of Community Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

    Billy R. Hammond;L. Stephen Miller;Medina O. Bello;Cutter A. Lindbergh

  • Prediction of functional status in older adults: The ecological validity of four Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System tests.

    Meghan Mitchell;L Stephen Miller

  • Relationships between macular pigment optical density and cognitive function in unimpaired and mildly cognitively impaired older adults.

    Lisa M. Renzi;Melissa J. Dengler;Melissa J. Dengler;Antonio Puente;L. Stephen Miller

  • Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory

    Carlos Cesar Faraco;Nash Unsworth;Jason Langley;Doug Terry

  • Effects of a Lutein and Zeaxanthin Intervention on Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Younger Healthy Adults

    Lisa M. Renzi-Hammond;Emily R. Bovier;Emily R. Bovier;Laura M. Fletcher;L. Stephen Miller

  • Lutein and Zeaxanthin Influence Brain Function in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Cutter A Lindbergh;Lisa M Renzi-Hammond;Billy R Hammond;Douglas P Terry

  • Understanding Centenarians' Psychosocial Dynamics and Their Contributions to Health and Quality of Life

    Leonard W. Poon;Peter Martin;Alex Bishop;Jinmyoung Cho

  • Comparison of cognitive performance in RDC-diagnosed schizoaffective and schizophrenic patients with the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery

    L.Stephen Miller;Tonja Swanson-Green;James A. Moses;William O. Faustman

  • The effect of effort on baseline neuropsychological test scores in high school football athletes

    Tamerah N. Hunt;Michael S. Ferrara;L. Stephen Miller;Stephen Macciocchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaiming Li
Kaiming Li Sichuan University
Leonard W. Poon
Leonard W. Poon University of Georgia
John L. Woodard
John L. Woodard Wayne State University
Adam Davey
Adam Davey University of Delaware
Peter Martin
Peter Martin Iowa State University
Lei Guo
Lei Guo Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Dajiang Zhu
Dajiang Zhu The University of Texas at Arlington
Dinggang Shen
Dinggang Shen ShanghaiTech University
Xintao Hu
Xintao Hu Northwestern Polytechnical University
Gang Li
Gang Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways, especially in mental health and counseling. Many students pursue online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility, enabling them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

A popular career choice for psychology graduates is to become a licensed therapist. Requirements and processes can differ significantly by location. For example, the steps involved in becoming a licensed therapist in North Las Vegas may differ from the qualifications needed for Oakland licensed therapist requirements.

Prospective therapists must also consider local regulations in other cities, such as following specific stages for becoming a licensed therapist in Oklahoma City or navigating state guidelines regarding how to become a licensed therapist in Omaha.

Whether you aim to work in schools, clinics, or private practice, earn your psychology degree online or on campus, and research your state's licensing requirements. This preparation will help you plan your academic and professional journey with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing L. Stephen Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles