World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
98
Citations
31691
World Ranking
812
National Ranking
407

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
33241
World Ranking
8333
National Ranking
4306

Peter H. Byers publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Byers sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 289 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Peter H. Byers D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Byers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter H. Byers is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a total of 114 and 101 publications respectively. Their subfields of expertise include Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Surgery.

Byers' work focuses on several interconnected topics, notably:

  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • RNA Research and Splicing

The scientist has published frequently in a variety of venues, including:

  • Seminars in Vascular Surgery
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques

Recent important research publications include:

  • The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers)
  • Consensus statement on standards and guidelines for the molecular diagnostics of Alport syndrome: refining the ACMG criteria (2021, European Journal of Human Genetics)
  • Mendelian inheritance revisited: dominance and recessiveness in medical genetics (2023, Nature Reviews Genetics)
  • De novo EIF2AK1 and EIF2AK2 Variants Are Associated with Developmental Delay, Leukoencephalopathy, and Neurologic Decompensation (2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • A call for direct sequencing of full-length RNAs to identify all modifications (2021, Nature Genetics)

Peter H. Byers has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Sherene Shalhub
  • Elizabeth Blue
  • Sirisak Chanprasert
  • Dustin Baldridge
  • Devon Bonner

Best Publications

  • Aneurysm Syndromes Caused by Mutations in the TGF-β Receptor

    Bart L. Loeys;Bart L. Loeys;Ulrike Schwarze;Tammy Holm;Bert L. Callewaert

  • The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes

    Fransiska Malfait;Clair Francomano;Peter H Byers;John Belmont

  • Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type.

    Melanie Pepin;Ulrike Schwarze;Andrea Superti-Furga;Peter H. Byers

  • Consortium for osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in the helical domain of type I collagen: regions rich in lethal mutations align with collagen binding sites for integrins and proteoglycans

    Joan C. Marini;Antonella Forlino;Antonella Forlino;Wayne A. Cabral;Aileen M. Barnes

  • CRTAP is required for prolyl 3- hydroxylation and mutations cause recessive osteogenesis imperfecta.

    Roy Morello;Terry K. Bertin;Yuqing Chen;Yuqing Chen;John Hicks

  • The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape.

    Benjamin M Schaefer;Mark B Lewin;Karen K Stout;Edward Gill

  • Loss-of-function mutations in TGFB2 cause a syndromic presentation of thoracic aortic aneurysm

    Mark E. Lindsay;Dorien Schepers;Nikhita Ajit Bolar;Jefferson J. Doyle

  • Gene targeting in stem cells from individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta.

    Joel R. Chamberlain;Ulrike Schwarze;Pei Rong Wang;Roli K. Hirata

  • Human Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VII C and bovine dermatosparaxis are caused by mutations in the procollagen I N-proteinase gene.

    Alain Colige;Aleksander L. Sieron;Shi Wu Li;Ulrike Schwarze

  • Actionable, Pathogenic Incidental Findings in 1,000 Participants’ Exomes

    Michael O. Dorschner;Laura M. Amendola;Emily H. Turner;Peggy D. Robertson

  • Osteogenesis imperfecta: translation of mutation to phenotype.

    Peter H. Byers;Gillian A. Wallis;Marcia Willing

  • Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification

    Laura M. Amendola;Michael O. Dorschner;Peggy D. Robertson;Joseph S. Salama

  • Homozygosity for a Missense Mutation in SERPINH1, which Encodes the Collagen Chaperone Protein HSP47, Results in Severe Recessive Osteogenesis Imperfecta

    Helena E. Christiansen;Ulrike Schwarze;Shawna M. Pyott;Abdulrahman AlSwaid

  • Correlation of procollagen mRNA levels in normal and transformed chick embryo fibroblasts with different rates of procollagen synthesis.

    David W. Rowe;Robert C. Moen;Jeffrey M. Davidson;Peter H. Byers

  • ASHG Statement* on Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in the United States

    Kathy Hudson;Gail Javitt;Wylie Burke;Peter Byers

  • Mutations in the Gene Encoding the RER Protein FKBP65 Cause Autosomal-Recessive Osteogenesis Imperfecta

    Yasemin Alanay;Hrispima Avaygan;Natalia Camacho;G. Eda Utine

  • Marfan syndrome : defective synthesis, secretion, and extracellular matrix formation of fibrillin by cultured dermal fibroblasts

    D M Milewicz;R E Pyeritz;E S Crawford;P H Byers

  • Diagnosis, natural history, and management in vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome

    Peter H. Byers;John Belmont;James Black;Julie De Backer

  • Survival is affected by mutation type and molecular mechanism in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS type IV).

    Melanie G. Pepin;Ulrike Schwarze;Kenneth M. Rice;Mingdong Liu

  • Perinatal lethal osteogenesis imperfecta (OI type II): a biochemically heterogeneous disorder usually due to new mutations in the genes for type I collagen.

    P H Byers;P Tsipouras;J F Bonadio;B J Starman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel H. Cohn
Daniel H. Cohn University of California, Los Angeles
Brendan Lee
Brendan Lee Baylor College of Medicine
Francis H. Glorieux
Francis H. Glorieux McGill University
David R. Eyre
David R. Eyre University of Washington
Frank Rauch
Frank Rauch McGill University
Deborah Krakow
Deborah Krakow University of California, Los Angeles
V. Reid Sutton
V. Reid Sutton Baylor College of Medicine
Deborah A. Nickerson
Deborah A. Nickerson University of Washington
MaryAnn Weis
MaryAnn Weis University of Washington
Beat Steinmann
Beat Steinmann University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying genetics can open doors to a wide range of healthcare and allied fields. For those interested in data and technology in healthcare, medical billing and coding courses provide an entry into medical recordkeeping and health informatics. This pathway combines analytical skills with healthcare knowledge and is ideal for students looking for flexible, affordable online options.

Another fast-growing field is nursing. If you are exploring clinical careers, consider an easiest nursing program to get into to start your journey. Nursing programs integrate biological sciences—like genetics—into their curriculum and provide many opportunities to specialize in patient care.

For leadership roles in healthcare, you may want to pursue a degree focusing on management and administration. Flexible, healthcare administration degree programs are available online, allowing for accelerated study and career advancement. Those seeking value can also explore the bachelors in health administration options to further develop their business and administrative skills in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Peter H. Byers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles