World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
15171
World Ranking
2788
National Ranking
1222

Deborah Krakow publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Krakow sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 201 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Deborah Krakow D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Krakow sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Deborah Krakow is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, contributing significantly to these fields through numerous publications.

The scientist's main fields of study are:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these, notable subfields include:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Krakow's research topics focus on:

  • Connective tissue disorders research
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Among recent papers, several key publications include:

  • "Placenta accreta spectrum disorder at single-cell resolution: a loss of boundary limits in the decidua and endothelium" (2024) published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision" (2023) published in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • "Clinical Presentation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Pregnant and Recently Pregnant People" (2020) published in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "An RNA aptamer restores defective bone growth in FGFR3-related skeletal dysplasia in mice" (2021) published in Science Translational Medicine
  • "Variant-specific changes in RAC3 function disrupt corticogenesis in neurodevelopmental phenotypes" (2022) published in Brain

Krakow collaborates frequently with several coauthors, reflecting interdisciplinary cooperation. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Pavel Krejčı́
  • Yalda Afshar
  • Iván Durán
  • Brendan Lee
  • Jennifer Zieba

Their work appears consistently in several publication venues, such as:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
  • Bone Reports

Recognition of their professional contributions includes being a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Consortium for osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in the helical domain of type I collagen: regions rich in lethal mutations align with collagen binding sites for integrins and proteoglycans

    Joan C. Marini;Antonella Forlino;Antonella Forlino;Wayne A. Cabral;Aileen M. Barnes

  • Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders : 2010 revision

    Matthew L. Warman;Valerie Cormier-Daire;Christine Hall;Deborah Krakow;Deborah Krakow

  • Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision.

    Geert R Mortier;Daniel H Cohn;Valerie Cormier-Daire;Christine Hall

  • Human Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VII C and bovine dermatosparaxis are caused by mutations in the procollagen I N-proteinase gene.

    Alain Colige;Aleksander L. Sieron;Shi Wu Li;Ulrike Schwarze

  • Dominance of SOX9 function over RUNX2 during skeletogenesis

    Guang Zhou;Qiping Zheng;Feyza Engin;Elda Munivez

  • Correction: Corrigendum: TCTEX1D2 mutations underlie Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy with impaired retrograde intraflagellar transport

    Miriam Schmidts;Yuqing Hou;Claudio R. Cortes;Dorus A. Mans

  • Heterozygous mutations in the gene encoding noggin affect human joint morphogenesis.

    Yaoqin Gong;Deborah Krakow;Deborah Krakow;Jose Marcelino;Douglas Wilkin

  • WNT1 Mutations in Early-onset Osteoporosis and Osteogenesis Imperfecta

    Christine M. Laine;Kyu Sang Joeng;Philippe M. Campeau;Riku Kiviranta

  • Mutations in the Gene Encoding the RER Protein FKBP65 Cause Autosomal-Recessive Osteogenesis Imperfecta

    Yasemin Alanay;Hrispima Avaygan;Natalia Camacho;G. Eda Utine

  • Mutations in the gene encoding filamin B disrupt vertebral segmentation, joint formation and skeletogenesis

    Deborah Krakow;Deborah Krakow;Stephen P Robertson;Lily M King;Timothy Morgan

  • The skeletal dysplasias

    Deborah Krakow;David L Rimoin;David L Rimoin

  • CRTAP and LEPRE1 mutations in recessive osteogenesis imperfecta.

    Dustin Baldridge;Ulrike Schwarze;Roy Morello;Jennifer Lennington

  • Activating and deactivating mutations in the receptor interaction site of GDF5 cause symphalangism or brachydactyly type A2

    Petra Seemann;Raphaela Schwappacher;Klaus W. Kjaer;Deborah Krakow

  • ADAMTSL2 mutations in geleophysic dysplasia demonstrate a role for ADAMTS-like proteins in TGF-beta bioavailability regulation.

    Carine Le Goff;Fanny Morice-Picard;Nathalie Dagoneau;Lauren W Wang

  • Mutations in the TGFβ Binding-Protein-Like Domain 5 of FBN1 Are Responsible for Acromicric and Geleophysic Dysplasias

    Carine Le Goff;Clémentine Mahaut;Lauren W Wang;Slimane Allali

  • Mutations in the Gene Encoding the Calcium-Permeable Ion Channel TRPV4 Produce Spondylometaphyseal Dysplasia, Kozlowski Type and Metatropic Dysplasia

    Deborah Krakow;Joris Vriens;Natalia Camacho;Phi Luong

  • Guidelines for the prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias

    Deborah Krakow;Ralph S. Lachman;David L. Rimoin

  • Mutations in Orthologous Genes in Human Spondyloepimetaphyseal Dysplasia and the Brachymorphic Mouse

    Faiyaz ul Haque M;King Lm;Krakow D;Krakow D;Cantor Rm

  • International nomenclature and classification of the osteochondrodysplasias (1997) international working group on constitutional diseases of bone

    David L. Rimoin;Glair A. Francomano;Andres Giedion;Christine Hall

  • Mutations in FKBP10 Cause Recessive Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Bruck Syndrome

    Brian P Kelley;Brian P Kelley;Fransiska Malfait;Luisa Bonafe;Dustin Baldridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel H. Cohn
Daniel H. Cohn University of California, Los Angeles
Ralph S. Lachman
Ralph S. Lachman University of California, Los Angeles
David L. Rimoin
David L. Rimoin Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Brendan Lee
Brendan Lee Baylor College of Medicine
William R. Wilcox
William R. Wilcox Emory University
Michael J. Bamshad
Michael J. Bamshad University of Washington
Lawrence D. Platt
Lawrence D. Platt University of California, Los Angeles
Deborah A. Nickerson
Deborah A. Nickerson University of Washington
Stephen P. Robertson
Stephen P. Robertson University of Otago
Carlos A. Bacino
Carlos A. Bacino Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics can open doors to a wide range of clinical and research careers. Many related fields, especially in healthcare, are now increasingly accessible through online degree programs. These options allow students to balance career advancement with flexible learning environments.

For those interested in advanced practice roles, consider pursuing an online nurse practitioner program, which can qualify you for specialized positions in patient care. If you're looking for cost-effective ways to start or continue a healthcare career, affordable online nursing paths such as affordable nursing programs provide strong foundational knowledge connected to genetic research and clinical practice.

For nurses aiming to reach leadership or academic positions, msn to dnp programs online offer an efficient pathway to the highest clinical degree. Registered nurses can advance their qualifications further through the cheapest rn to bsn online options, building a strong foundation in genetics and patient care.

Online degrees make it easier than ever to align your education with your schedule and career goals, especially in evolving fields like Genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Krakow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles