World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4873
World Ranking
10857
National Ranking
120

Daniela S. Jopp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela S. Jopp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniela S. Jopp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela S. Jopp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Health and Well–Being in the Young Old and Oldest Old

    Jacqui Smith;Markus Borchelt;Heiner Maier;Daniela Jopp

  • Adaptation in very old age: exploring the role of resources, beliefs, and attitudes for centenarians' happiness.

    Daniela Jopp;Christoph Rott

  • Resources and life-management strategies as determinants of successful aging: On the protective effect of selection, optimization, and compensation.

    Daniela Jopp;Jacqui Smith

  • Is Aging in Place a Resource for or Risk to Life Satisfaction

    Frank Oswald;Daniela Jopp;Christoph Rott;Hans-Werner Wahl

  • The Importance of Leisure Activities in the Relationship between Physical Health and Well-Being in a Life Span Sample.

    Michelle E. Paggi;Daniela Jopp;Christopher Hertzog

  • Assessing Adult Leisure Activities: An Extension of a Self-Report Activity Questionnaire.

    Daniela S. Jopp;Christopher Hertzog

  • How Could Lay Perspectives on Successful Aging Complement Scientific Theory? Findings From a U.S. and a German Life-Span Sample

    Daniela S. Jopp;Dagmara Wozniak;Amanda K. Damarin;Melissa De Feo

  • Physical, cognitive, social and mental health in near-centenarians and centenarians living in New York City: findings from the Fordham Centenarian Study.

    Daniela S. Jopp;Min-Kyung S. Park;Jonathan Lehrfeld;Michelle E. Paggi

  • Improvement/Maintenance and Reorientation as Central Features of Coping with Major Life Change and Loss: Contributions of Three Life-Span Theories

    Kathrin Boerner;Daniela Jopp

  • The impact of leisure activities on older adults' cognitive function, physical function, and mental health.

    Giovanni Sala;Daniela Jopp;Fernand Gobet;Madoka Ogawa

  • Activities, self-referent memory beliefs, and cognitive performance: evidence for direct and mediated relations.

    Daniela Jopp;Christopher Hertzog

  • Valuation of Life in Old and Very Old Age: The Role of Sociodemographic, Social, and Health Resources for Positive Adaptation

    Daniela Jopp;Christoph Rott;Frank Oswald

  • Maladaptive daydreaming: Evidence for an under-researched mental health disorder.

    Jayne Bigelsen;Jonathan M. Lehrfeld;Daniela S. Jopp;Eli Somer

  • Development and validation of the Maladaptive Daydreaming Scale (MDS).

    Eli Somer;Jonathan Lehrfeld;Jayne Bigelsen;Daniela S. Jopp

  • “His” and “Her” Marriage? The Role of Positive and Negative Marital Characteristics in Global Marital Satisfaction Among Older Adults

    Kathrin Boerner;Daniela S. Jopp;Deborah Carr;Laura Sosinsky

  • Grief After Patient Death: Direct Care Staff in Nursing Homes and Homecare

    Kathrin Boerner;Kathrin Boerner;Orah R. Burack;Daniela S. Jopp;Steven E. Mock

  • Burnout After Patient Death: Challenges for Direct Care Workers.

    Kathrin Boerner;Hayley Gleason;Daniela S. Jopp

  • Childhood Antecedents and Maintaining Factors in Maladaptive Daydreaming.

    Eli Somer;Liora Somer;Daniela S. Jopp

  • Personality and its links to quality of life: Mediating effects of emotion regulation and self-efficacy beliefs

    Cornelia Pocnet;Marc Dupuis;Anne Congard;Daniela Jopp

  • Parallel lives: A phenomenological study of the lived experience of maladaptive daydreaming

    Eli Somer;Liora Somer;Daniela S. Jopp

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathrin Boerner
Kathrin Boerner Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Eli Somer
Eli Somer University of Haifa
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology
Jacqui Smith
Jacqui Smith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Gustav Kuhn
Gustav Kuhn Plymouth University
Hermann Brenner
Hermann Brenner German Cancer Research Center
Celia B. Fisher
Celia B. Fisher Fordham University
Hans-Werner Wahl
Hans-Werner Wahl Heidelberg University
Jan Vijg
Jan Vijg Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniela S. Jopp

Recently Published Articles