World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michele Tansella

Michele Tansella

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22485
World Ranking
17155
National Ranking
691

Michele Tansella publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michele Tansella sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 550 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michele Tansella D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michele Tansella sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michele Tansella was affiliated with the University of Verona in Italy. Their academic career involved research activities tied to this institution.

There are no available records of recent papers published by Michele Tansella, nor documented frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study associated with their work.

Additionally, no specific main topics of research, awards, or recognitions have been recorded in the accessible data concerning Michele Tansella.

The absence of listed publications and scholarly contributions in this dataset limits the detailed overview of their research scope or academic impact.

Best Publications

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshiaki A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;John R Geddes

  • Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness.

    Mirella Ruggeri;Morven Leese;Graham Thornicroft;Giulia Bisoffi

  • Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care: overview of systematic evidence.

    Graham Thornicroft;Michele Tansella

  • Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Detection of Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in General Health Care Settings Report From the World Health Organization Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care

    Richard Gater;Michele Tansella;Ailsa Korten;Bea G. Tiemens

  • How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review

    M. Nosé;Corrado Barbui;M. Tansella

  • Efficacy of the alcohol use disorders identification test as a screening tool for hazardous alcohol intake and related disorders in primary care: a validity study

    Marco Piccinelli;Elisabetta Tessari;Marco Bortolomasi;Orazio Piasere

  • The Mental Health Matrix: A Manual to Improve Services

    Graham Thornicroft;Michele Tansella;David Goldberg

  • Two-phase epidemiological surveys in psychiatric research.

    Graham Dunn;Andrew Pickles;Michele Tansella;José Luis Vázquez-Barquero

  • The personal impact of schizophrenia in Europe

    Graham Thornicroft;Michele Tansella;Thomas Becker;Martin Knapp

  • Burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction among staff in community-based mental health services

    Alberto Rossi;Gaia Cetrano;Riccardo Pertile;Laura Rabbi

  • Validity and test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in general practice: a comparison between three scoring methods.

    Marco Piccinelli;Giulia Bisoffi;Maria Giovanna Bon;Laura Cunico

  • Influence of perceived organisational factors on job burnout: survey of community mental health staff

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Mariaelena Bertani;Sarah Bissoli

  • Adherence Therapy for People with Schizophrenia. European Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

    Richard Gray;Morven Leese;Jonathan Bindman;Thomas Becker

  • Clinical interventions for treatment non-adherence in psychosis: meta-analysis

    Michela Nosé;Corrado Barbui;Richard Gray;Michele Tansella

  • Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation.

    Graham Thornicroft;Michele Tansella

  • Subthreshold psychiatric disorders in primary care: prevalence and associated characteristics.

    Paola Rucci;Stefano Gherardi;Michele Tansella;Marco Piccinelli

  • Does meeting needs improve quality of life

    Mike Slade;Morven Leese;Mirella Ruggeri;Elizabeth Kuipers

  • Implementation science: understanding the translation of evidence into practice.

    Michele Tansella;Graham Thornicroft

  • Comparing patterns and costs of schizophrenia care in five European countries: the EPSILON study

    Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;Daniel Chisholm;Daniel Chisholm;Morven Leese;Francesco Amaddeo

  • Suicide and unemployment in Italy: description, analysis and interpretation of recent trends.

    Stephen Platt;Rocco Micciolo;Rocco Micciolo;Michele Tansella

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Francesco Amaddeo
Francesco Amaddeo University of Verona
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
Antonio Lasalvia
Antonio Lasalvia University of Verona
Matteo Balestrieri
Matteo Balestrieri University of Udine
Chiara Bonetto
Chiara Bonetto University of Verona
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Aart H. Schene
Aart H. Schene University of Amsterdam
Morven Leese
Morven Leese King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine in the USA offers a wide array of online degrees and flexible career pathways for individuals at all stages of their healthcare journey. For those interested in healthcare administration, pursuing a health care administration degree online can open doors to managerial roles within medical institutions, all while allowing you to study at your own pace.

If you aspire to enter the nursing profession, but are worried about entrance exams, several nursing school that don't require teas can help you start your journey without the stress of standardized testing barriers. These flexible options can make it easier to transition into healthcare for those with varied academic backgrounds.

Financial considerations are often a concern. Many wonder: can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? The good news is, there are accredited online programs offering financial support to help you gain valuable skills in this high-demand field.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement may consider bridge programs like rn to fnp programs. These online pathways allow experienced nurses to quickly transition to advanced practice roles with greater responsibilities and earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Michele Tansella