World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5648
World Ranking
7995
National Ranking
90

Michael Pascal Hengartner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Pascal Hengartner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Michael Pascal Hengartner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Pascal Hengartner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Pascal Hengartner is affiliated with Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, with a focus on treatment and mental health topics. The scientist has contributed substantially to the study of depression, especially concerning antidepressant efficacy and withdrawal effects.

The primary fields of study for Hengartner include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Their subfields of study highlight a broad engagement with:

  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Main research topics encompass:

  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Frequent publication venues for Hengartner's work include:

  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Significant publications by Hengartner comprise:

  • Estimates of the minimal important difference to evaluate the clinical significance of antidepressants in the acute treatment of moderate-to-severe depression, 2021, BMJ evidence-based medicine
  • How effective are antidepressants for depression over the long term? A critical review of relapse prevention trials and the issue of withdrawal confounding, 2020, Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
  • Protracted withdrawal syndrome after stopping antidepressants: a descriptive quantitative analysis of consumer narratives from a large internet forum, 2020, Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology

Other notable papers related to the broader field Hengartner works in include:

  • The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry (by Joanna Moncrieff)
  • Estimating Risk of Antidepressant Withdrawal from a Review of Published Data, 2022, CNS Drugs (by Mark Horowitz)

Hengartner frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Martin Plöderl
  • Simone Amendola
  • Mark Horowitz
  • Joanna Moncrieff
  • Janus Christian Jakobsen

Best Publications

  • The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence

    Unknown

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • A prospective population-based cohort study of the prevalence, incidence and impact of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology

    Naomi A Fineberg;Michael P Hengartner;Carmel E Bergbaum;Tim M Gale

  • Why Psychiatric Research Must Abandon Traditional Diagnostic Classification and Adopt a Fully Dimensional Scope: Two Solutions to a Persistent Problem

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Sandrine N. Lehmann

  • Sub-clinical psychosis symptoms in young adults are risk factors for subsequent common mental disorders

    Wulf Rössler;Wulf Rössler;Michael Pascal Hengartner;Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross;Helene Haker

  • Childhood adversity in association with personality disorder dimensions: New findings in an old debate

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;V. Ajdacic-Gross;S. Rodgers;M. Müller

  • The epidemiology of common mental disorders from age 20 to 50: results from the prospective Zurich cohort Study

    Jules Angst;D. Paksarian;L. Cui;K. R. Merikangas

  • Lifetime comorbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorder and sub-threshold obsessive-compulsive symptomatology in the community: impact, prevalence, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.

    Naomi A Fineberg;Michael P Hengartner;Carmel Bergbaum;Tim Gale

  • Mental Health and Functioning of Female Sex Workers in Chittagong, Bangladesh

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Nazrul Islam;Helene Haker;Wulf Rössler;Wulf Rössler

  • Statistically Significant Antidepressant-Placebo Differences on Subjective Symptom-Rating Scales Do Not Prove That the Drugs Work: Effect Size and Method Bias Matter!

    Michael P. Hengartner;Martin Plöderl

  • Estimates of the minimal important difference to evaluate the clinical significance of antidepressants in the acute treatment of moderate-to-severe depression

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Martin Plöderl

  • Predictors of burnout: results from a prospective community study

    Wulf Rössler;Michael Pascal Hengartner;Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross;Jules Angst

  • Big Five personality traits may inform public health policy and preventive medicine: Evidence from a cross-sectional and a prospective longitudinal epidemiologic study in a Swiss community.

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Wolfram Kawohl;Helene Haker;Wulf Rössler;Wulf Rössler

  • The more information, the more negative stigma towards schizophrenia: Brazilian general population and psychiatrists compared

    Alexandre Andrade Loch;Michael Pascal Hengartner;Francisco Bevilacqua Guarniero;Fabio Lorea Lawson

  • Association between childhood maltreatment and normal adult personality traits : exploration of an understudied field

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Lisa J. Cohen;Stephanie Rodgers;Mario Müller

  • Linking substance use with symptoms of subclinical psychosis in a community cohort over 30 years

    Wulf Rössler;Wulf Rössler;Michael Pascal Hengartner;Jules Angst;Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross

  • Relationship between personality and psychopathology in a longitudinal community study : a test of the predisposition model

    Michael Pascal Hengartner;Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross;Christine Wyss;Jules Angst

  • Symptom-based subtypes of depression and their psychosocial correlates: A person-centered approach focusing on the influence of sex

    Stephanie Rodgers;Martin Grosse Holtforth;Mario Müller;Michael P. Hengartner

  • Birth experiences in adult women with a history of childhood sexual abuse.

    Brigitte Leeners;Gisela Görres;Emina Block;Michael Pascal Hengartner

  • Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies: Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants' Efficacy and Harm.

    Michael Pascal Hengartner

  • Mortality of 403 patients with mood disorders 48 to 52 years after their psychiatric hospitalisation.

    Jules Angst;Michael Pascal Hengartner;Alex Gamma;Detlev von Zerssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jules Angst
Jules Angst University of Zurich
Dimitri van der Linden
Dimitri van der Linden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Martin Grosse Holtforth
Martin Grosse Holtforth University of Bern
John Read
John Read University of East London
Filip De Fruyt
Filip De Fruyt Ghent University
Susanne Walitza
Susanne Walitza University of Zurich
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University
Bo Bach
Bo Bach University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to specialized fields like behavior analysis, mental health counseling, and education. Many students interested in behavior analysis consider becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a career that requires specific qualifications depending on your location.

If you're curious about bcba certification requirements in Arlington, you'll notice they emphasize a graduate-level education and supervised experience. Similarly, bcba certification requirements in Atlanta involve meeting coursework standards and fieldwork hours, which can often be completed through accredited online programs.

Those interested in other regions will find that Aurora bcba education requirements and Austin bcba requirements also highlight the importance of proper accreditation and supervised practice.

Choosing a related online degree in Psychology or Behavior Analysis not only helps fulfill these requirements, but also prepares you for careers in healthcare, education, and social services. As you map your academic journey, always ensure your program meets state-specific regulations to stay on track toward professional certification.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Pascal Hengartner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles