World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francesco Amaddeo

Francesco Amaddeo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5110 4742 54 52 170 6127

Francesco Amaddeo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francesco Amaddeo between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francesco Amaddeo published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2018. 8 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2018. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francesco Amaddeo: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 6
1996 2
1997 3
1998 10
1999 3
2000 3
2001 7
2002 4
2003 3
2004 7
2005 10
2006 5
2007 9
2008 2
2009 4
2010 7
2011 7
2012 5
2013 5
2014 7
2015 3
2016 9
2017 5
2018 14
2019 5
2020 9
2021 9
2022 5
2023 6
2024 5
2025 3
Total 183
Download as CSV

Francesco Amaddeo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Amaddeo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 170
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Francesco Amaddeo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Amaddeo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory - European Version : development of an instrument for international research: EPSILON Study 5

    D. Chisholm;M. R. J. Knapp;H. C. Knudsen;F. Amaddeo

  • A review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) health and healthcare inequalities

    Zeeman L;Sherriff N;Sherriff N;Browne K;McGlynn N

  • Burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction among staff in community-based mental health services

    Alberto Rossi;Gaia Cetrano;Riccardo Pertile;Laura Rabbi

  • Levels of burn-out among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of a highly burdened area of north-east Italy.

    Antonio Lasalvia;Francesco Amaddeo;Stefano Porru;Angela Carta

  • Comparing patterns and costs of schizophrenia care in five European countries: the EPSILON study

    Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;Daniel Chisholm;Daniel Chisholm;Morven Leese;Francesco Amaddeo

  • Pre-discharge factors predicting readmissions of psychiatric patients: a systematic review of the literature

    Valeria Donisi;Federico Tedeschi;K. Wahlbeck;P. Haaramo

  • How are compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction affected by quality of working life? Findings from a survey of mental health staff in Italy

    Gaia Cetrano;Federico Tedeschi;Laura Rabbi;Giorgio Gosetti

  • Dropping out of care: inappropriate terminations of contact with community-based psychiatric services

    Alberto Rossi;Francesco Amaddeo;Giulia Bisoffi;Mirella Ruggeri

  • Describing, explaining or predicting mental health care costs: a guide to regression models. Methodological review.

    Graham Dunn;Massimo Mirandola;Francesco Amaddeo;Michele Tansella

  • Accessibility and pathways to psychiatric care in a community-based mental health system.

    F Amaddeo;F Zambello;M Tansella;G Thornicroft

  • Mortality among patients with psychiatric illness. A ten-year case register study in an area with a community-based system of care.

    Francesco Amaddeo;Giulia Bisoffi;Paola Bonizzato;Rocco Micciolo

  • The reliability of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview--Italian version.

    Alberto Rossi;Roberta Alberio;Alberto Porta;Marco Sandri

  • The use of a case register to evaluate the costs of psychiatric care

    Francesco Amaddeo;Jennifer Beecham;Paola Bonizzato;Andrew J. Fenyo

  • Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries

    Mencía Ruiz Gutiérrez-Colosía;Luis Salvador-Carulla;José Alberto Salinas-Pérez;C. R. García-Alonso

  • Mortality and cause of death among psychiatric patients: a 20-year case-register study in an area with a community-based system of care.

    Laura Grigoletti;G. Perini;Alberto Rossi;A. Biggeri

  • Safety of psychotropic medications in people with COVID-19: evidence review and practical recommendations.

    Giovanni Ostuzzi;Davide Papola;Chiara Gastaldon;Georgios Schoretsanitis

  • A Comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D Utility Scores in a Study of Patients with Schizophrenia

    Paul McCrone;Anita Patel;Martin Knapp;Aart Schene

  • Self-harm and suicidality among LGBTIQ people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • First-contact incidence of psychosis in north-eastern Italy: influence of age, gender, immigration and socioeconomic deprivation

    Antonio Lasalvia;Chiara Bonetto;Sarah Tosato;Gioia Zanatta

  • Community based Mental Health care in Verona, Italy

    Michele Tansella;Francesco Amaddeo;Lorenzo Burti;Nicola Garzotto

Frequent Co-Authors

Michele Tansella
Michele Tansella University of Verona
Marta Miret
Marta Miret Autonomous University of Madrid
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Luis Salvador-Carulla
Luis Salvador-Carulla Australian National University
Angelo Picardi
Angelo Picardi Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Antonio Lasalvia
Antonio Lasalvia University of Verona
Chiara Bonetto
Chiara Bonetto University of Verona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a diverse range of career fields. Today’s online programs are designed for flexibility, affordability, and career acceleration, making them ideal for both recent graduates and working professionals.

Many students opt for an online masters degree to deepen their expertise while balancing personal or job commitments. For those looking to enter the workforce quickly or transition careers, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults offer a fast-track path to graduation.

Cost is often a key consideration when choosing a program. Options like the cheapest online master's in social work help make advanced degrees more accessible, especially for students interested in vital public service careers. Likewise, those pursuing specialization in behavioral analysis may find value in bcba masters programs online.

Carefully reviewing program duration, accreditation, and tuition can help you select the right online pathway for your academic and professional goals in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Amaddeo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles