World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
20731
World Ranking
3067
National Ranking
1746

Mark Sherer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Sherer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Sherer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Sherer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Sherer is affiliated with the Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Mark Sherer has published extensively in several scientific venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • JAMA Neurology

Selected recent papers include:

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study, 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for psychological distress among persons with traumatic brain injury, 2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Elevated Diffusivity of White Matter Microstructure that Is Independently Associated with Long-Term Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study, 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Post-traumatic Confusional State: A Case Definition and Diagnostic Criteria, 2020, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Mark Sherer include:

  • Angelle M. Sander
  • Joseph T. Giacino
  • Yelena G. Bodien
  • Lindsay D. Nelson
  • Harvey S. Levin

Best Publications

  • The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation:

    Mark Sherer;James E. Maddux;Blaise Mercandante;Steven Prentice-Dunn

  • Placebo-Controlled Trial of Amantadine for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Joseph T. Giacino;John Whyte;Emilia Bagiella;Kathleen Kalmar

  • Assessment Scales for Disorders of Consciousness: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Clinical Practice and Research

    Ronald T. Seel;Mark Sherer;John Whyte;Douglas I. Katz

  • Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury.

    Scott R. Millis;Mitchell Rosenthal;Thomas A. Novack;Mark Sherer

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale

    Unknown

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions

    James E. Maddux;Mark Sherer;Ronald W. Rogers

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study

    Michael A McCrea;Joseph T Giacino;Joseph T Giacino;Jason Barber;Nancy R Temkin

  • Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury.

    Jeffrey S. Kreutzer;Jennifer H. Marwitz;William Walker;Angelle Sander

  • The Awareness Questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency

    Mark Sherer;Paula Bergloff;Corwin Boake;Walter High

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: findings from the TBI model systems.

    Mark Sherer;Angelle M. Sander;Todd G. Nick;Walter M. High

  • Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs.

    Risa Nakase-Richardson;Risa Nakase-Richardson;John Whyte;Joseph T. Giacino;Shital Pavawalla

  • Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

    John K. Yue;Esther L. Yuh;Frederick K. Korley;Ethan A. Winkler

  • Assessment of Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Presentation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.

    Seth A. Seabury;Étienne Gaudette;Dana P. Goldman;Amy J. Markowitz

  • A longitudinal study of awareness of deficit after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

    Tessa Hart;Paul J Seignourel;Mark Sherer

  • TBI-QOL: Development and Calibration of Item Banks to Measure Patient Reported Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Pamela A. Kisala;David Victorson;Noelle Carlozzi

  • The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury

    Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Scott R. Millis;Scott R. Millis;Joseph H. Ricker;Joseph T. Giacino

  • Traumatic brain injury and functional outcomes: Does minority status matter?

    Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla;Mitchell Rosenthal;John Deluca;Eugene Komaroff

  • Neuropsychological assessment and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury: a review.

    Mark Sherer;Thomas A Novack;Angelle M Sander;Margaret A Struchen

  • Using early neuropsychologic testing to predict long-term productivity outcome from traumatic brain injury

    Corwin Boake;Scott R. Millis;Walter M. High;Richard L. Delmonico

  • Awareness of behavioral, cognitive, and physical deficits in acute traumatic brain injury.

    Tessa Hart;Mark Sherer;John Whyte;Marcia Polansky

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
John Whyte
John Whyte Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience
Joseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino Massachusetts General Hospital
Tessa Hart
Tessa Hart Yeshiva University
James F. Malec
James F. Malec Indiana University
Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Ross Zafonte
Ross Zafonte Harvard Medical School
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Thomas A. Novack
Thomas A. Novack University of Alabama at Birmingham
Sureyya Dikmen
Sureyya Dikmen University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of specialized educational and career opportunities. For those interested in behavior analysis, best aba online programs offer pathways to become certified Applied Behavior Analysts, highly sought after in educational and clinical settings.

Time-conscious learners might consider accelerated psychology programs, which allow you to complete your studies at a faster pace—getting you into the workforce sooner or ready for graduate school more quickly.

If your goal is to become a licensed clinical psychologist, it's crucial to choose from apa approved clinical psychology programs. These programs meet strict accreditation standards, which are often required for licensure and professional practice.

Those pursuing advanced practice might explore apa accredited psyd programs. These professional doctoral programs focus on preparing students for clinical roles, emphasizing practical skills and real-world experience.

Choosing the right online pathway is an important step towards a rewarding and flexible career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Sherer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles