World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rendon C. Nelson

Rendon C. Nelson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15206 14304 7671 7095 347 23545

Rendon C. Nelson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rendon C. Nelson between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rendon C. Nelson published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2014. 1 of the 351 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2014. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1963 2025

351 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rendon C. Nelson: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 1
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 7
1988 5
1989 9
1990 6
1991 12
1992 7
1993 8
1994 8
1995 9
1996 8
1997 9
1998 18
1999 15
2000 14
2001 7
2002 8
2003 9
2004 10
2005 6
2006 12
2007 12
2008 12
2009 11
2010 12
2011 13
2012 9
2013 10
2014 20
2015 16
2016 9
2017 7
2018 6
2019 9
2020 2
2021 6
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 351
Download as CSV

Rendon C. Nelson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rendon C. Nelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 347 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 347
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rendon C. Nelson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rendon C. Nelson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rendon C. Nelson is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a focused research profile in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans a variety of specialized subfields including Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research primarily concentrates on topics related to cardiovascular and exercise physiology, cardiac health and mental health, and heart rate variability and autonomic control. Additional areas of investigation include physical activity and health, cardiovascular effects of exercise, obesity, physical activity and diet, and heart failure treatment and management.

Rendon C. Nelson has published in several respected academic venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
  • Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Heart Failure Reviews

Some of the recent papers include:

  • Exercise Prescription Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Patients in the Absence of a Baseline Stress Test (2020) - Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
  • Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines (2022) - Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization, Barriers, and Outcomes Among Patients with Heart Failure (2023) - Heart Failure Reviews
  • Exercise During Pregnancy: What Do OB/GYNs Believe and Practice? A Descriptive Analysis (2022) - Women's Health Reports
  • Effect of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus on Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Meta-analysis (2022) - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Micah Zuhl
  • Joshua P. Muench
  • Kellie N. Hoehing
  • Rachel N. West
  • Jacklyn P. Hensel

Best Publications

  • “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake

    Joop J. Van Vaals;Marijn E. Brummer;W. Thomas Dixon;Hans H. Tuithof

  • Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.

    Daniele Marin;Rendon C. Nelson;Sebastian T. Schindera;Samuel Richard

  • Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA

    Carlos Micames;Paul S Jowell;Rebekah White;Erik Paulson

  • Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging?

    Courtney A. Coursey;Rendon C. Nelson;Daniel T. Boll;Erik K. Paulson

  • State of the art: dual-energy CT of the abdomen.

    Daniele Marin;Daniel T. Boll;Achille Mileto;Rendon C. Nelson

  • Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation.

    R C Nelson;J L Chezmar;P H Sugarbaker;M E Bernardino

  • Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI

    Mustafa R. Bashir;Lubna Bhatti;Daniele Marin;Rendon C. Nelson

  • Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques.

    Joan P Heneghan;Keith A McGuire;Richard A Leder;David M DeLong

  • Effects of aerobic vs. resistance training on visceral and liver fat stores, liver enzymes, and insulin resistance by HOMA in overweight adults from STRRIDE AT/RT

    Cris A. Slentz;Lori A. Bateman;Leslie H Willis;A Tamlyn Shields

  • Nonenhanced Helical CT and US in the Emergency Evaluation of Patients with Renal Colic: Prospective Comparison

    Douglas H. Sheafor;Barbara S. Hertzberg;Kelly S. Freed;Barbara A. Carroll

  • Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol.

    Brendan J. Barrett;Richard W. Katzberg;Henrik S. Thomsen;Nan Chen

  • Treatment of iatrogenic femoral arterial pseudoaneurysms: comparison of US-guided thrombin injection with compression repair.

    Erik K. Paulson;Douglas H. Sheafor;Mark A. Kliewer;Rendon C. Nelson

  • Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multidetector CT during Late Hepatic Arterial Phase for Detection—Initial Clinical Experience

    Daniele Marin;Rendon C. Nelson;Ehsan Samei;Erik K. Paulson

  • Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases : a comparison of imaging modalities

    Keith E. Volmar;Robin T. Vollmer;Paul S. Jowell;Rendon C. Nelson

  • Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.

    Courtney A. Coursey;Rendon C. Nelson;Mayur B. Patel;Courtney Cochran

  • Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen : Demonstration of feasibility and utility

    Brian J. Fahey;Kathryn R. Nightingale;Rendon C. Nelson;Mark L. Palmeri

  • In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography

    B J Fahey;R C Nelson;D P Bradway;S J Hsu

  • The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT.

    E C Jones;J L Chezmar;R C Nelson;M E Bernardino

  • New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: How do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages?

    Rendon C. Nelson;Sebastian Feuerlein;Daniel T. Boll

  • Hypervascular Liver Tumors: Low Tube Voltage, High Tube Current Multi–Detector Row CT for Enhanced Detection—Phantom Study

    Sebastian T. Schindera;Rendon C. Nelson;Srinivasan Mukundan;Erik K. Paulson

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik K. Paulson
Erik K. Paulson Duke University
Ehsan Samei
Ehsan Samei Duke University
Thomas J. Polascik
Thomas J. Polascik Duke University
Gregg E. Trahey
Gregg E. Trahey Duke University
James M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale Duke University
G. Allan Johnson
G. Allan Johnson Duke University
Sanjay Saini
Sanjay Saini Harvard University
Dushyant V. Sahani
Dushyant V. Sahani University of Washington
Julie A. Sosa
Julie A. Sosa University of California, San Francisco
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Maciej A. Mazurowski Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary healthcare career options is a smart move for students considering or currently studying Medicine in the USA. Several online degree pathways and certifications offer flexibility, career advancement, and entry points into the healthcare field without the lengthy commitment of medical school.

For example, a popular choice is medical billing and coding, which can be started online and quickly leads to in-demand roles in healthcare settings. Many programs also offer financial aid for medical billing and coding, making this a more accessible option for many students.

Another pathway is practical nursing. If you’re wondering, do you have to take a teas test for lpn? The answer depends on the school—some programs don’t require the TEAS or HESI exams, making entry into nursing more flexible.

For those interested in health leadership, a health care administration degree online is available through accelerated programs, helping you move quickly into management roles.

Finally, registered nurses can advance their careers through asn to np programs. These bridge programs allow nurses with an associate degree to become Nurse Practitioners, opening doors to higher-level clinical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rendon C. Nelson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles