World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jos Vander Sloten

Jos Vander Sloten

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7672 7401 95 95 492 6480

Jos Vander Sloten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jos Vander Sloten between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jos Vander Sloten published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2014. 9 of the 645 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2014. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 36 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

645 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jos Vander Sloten: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 2
1994 7
1995 3
1996 10
1997 9
1998 15
1999 20
2000 19
2001 18
2002 32
2003 22
2004 36
2005 30
2006 22
2007 18
2008 23
2009 25
2010 27
2011 24
2012 28
2013 37
2014 40
2015 39
2016 30
2017 17
2018 20
2019 14
2020 9
2021 14
2022 13
2023 7
2024 6
2025 3
Total 645
Download as CSV

Jos Vander Sloten publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos Vander Sloten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 488–497 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 492 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29 492
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jos Vander Sloten D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos Vander Sloten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Polish Academy of Science

Overview

Jos Vander Sloten is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to research in Medicine, with a particular focus on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Neurology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their research encompasses several key topics including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries

Jos Vander Sloten has published in a variety of scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Brain and Spine
  • Gait & Posture
  • Acta Neurochirurgica
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis," 2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • "Regional characterization of the dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue by microindentation," 2020, International Journal of Engineering Science
  • "Towards animal surrogates for characterising large strain dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue," 2020, Brain Multiphysics
  • "Functional outcome, dependency and well-being after traumatic brain injury in the elderly population: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, Brain and Spine
  • "Traumatic brain injury in the elderly population: a 20-year experience in a tertiary neurosurgery center in Belgium," 2022, Acta Neurochirurgica

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Ilse Jonkers
  • Bart Depreitere
  • Roel Wirix-Speetjens
  • Stijn E.F. Huys
  • Nele Famaey

In 2017, Jos Vander Sloten received an award from the Polish Academy of Science.

Best Publications

  • The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study.

    Joke Duyck;Ignace Naert;Hans Jacob Rønold;Jan Eirik Ellingsen

  • The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants.

    Hans Van Oosterwyck;Joke Duyck;Jos Vander Sloten;Georges Van der Perre

  • Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: a bioregulatory model.

    Liesbet Geris;Alf Gerisch;Jos Vander Sloten;Rüdiger Weiner

  • Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study

    Joke Duyck;Hans Van Oosterwyck;Jos Vander Sloten;Michel De Cooman

  • The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position.

    Julie A. Motherway;Peter Verschueren;Georges Van der Perre;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering.

    Banchong Mahaisavariya;Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip;Trongtum Tongdee;Erik L.J Bohez

  • Influence of Implant Connection Type on the Biomechanical Environment of Immediately Placed Implants – CT-Based Nonlinear, Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

    Roberto S. Pessoa;Luiza Muraru;Elcio Marcantonio Júnior;Luis Geraldo Vaz

  • MEDICAL RAPID PROTOTYPING APPLICATIONS AND METHODS

    Unknown

  • An Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory and Movement Features With Respect to Sleep-Stage Classification

    T. Willemen;D. Van Deun;V. Verhaert;M. Vandekerckhove

  • Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes

    F. Gelaude;J. Vander Sloten;B. Lauwers

  • Three-dimensional computed tomography-based, personalized drill guide for posterior cervical stabilization at C1-C2.

    Jan Goffin;Karel Van Brussel;Kirsten Martens;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Soft tissue modelling for applications in virtual surgery and surgical robotics.

    Nele Famaey;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Segmentation accuracy of long bones

    Joyce Van den Broeck;Joyce Van den Broeck;Evie Vereecke;Roel Wirix-Speetjens;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds

    Tim Van Cleynenbreugel;Jan Schrooten;Hans Van Oosterwyck;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Connecting biology and mechanics in fracture healing: an integrated mathematical modeling framework for the study of nonunions

    L. Geris;J. Vander Sloten;H. Van Oosterwyck

  • Load sharing and ligament strains in balanced, overstuffed and understuffed UKA. A validated finite element analysis.

    Bernardo Innocenti;Bernardo Innocenti;Ömer Faruk Bilgen;Luc Labey;G. Harry van Lenthe

  • Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.

    Bernard A.M.M.L. Moerenhout;Frederik Gelaude;Gwen R.J. Swennen;Jan W. Casselman

  • Bone Remodeling Around Implants with External Hexagon and Morse-Taper Connections: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Clinical Trial.

    Roberto S Pessoa;Roberto S Pessoa;Ravel M Sousa;Leandro M Pereira;Flavio D Neves

  • In silico biology of bone modelling and remodelling: regeneration

    Liesbet Geris;J. Vander Sloten;H. Van Oosterwyck

  • Influence of bone milling parameters on the temperature rise, milling forces and surface flatness in view of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty

    K Denis;G Van Ham;J Vander Sloten;R Van Audekercke

  • Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bi-cortical guinea-pig model.

    Els De Smet;Siegfried Jaecques;Katleen Vandamme;Jos Vander Sloten

  • Biomechanics of frontal skull fracture

    Hans Delye;Peter Verschueren;Bart Depreitere;Ignaas Verpoest

  • Teaching a structured approach to the design process for undergraduate engineering students by problem-based education

    Unknown

  • Effect of controlled early implant loading on bone healing and bone mass in guinea pigs, as assessed by micro-CT and histology.

    Els De Smet;Siegfried V. N. Jaecques;Martine Wevers;John A. Jansen

  • Planar biaxial testing of soft biological tissue using rakes: A critical analysis of protocol and fitting process.

    Heleen Fehervary;Marija Smoljkić;Jos Vander Sloten;Nele Famaey

  • A classification of cranial implants based on the degree of difficulty in computer design and manufacture.

    Jules Poukens;Paul Laeven;Maikel Beerens;Gerard Nijenhuis

  • Mathematical modeling of fracture healing in mice: comparison between experimental data and numerical simulation results

    Liesbet Geris;Alf Gerisch;Christa Maes;Geert Carmeliet

  • Collateral ligament strains during knee joint laxity evaluation before and after TKA

    Hendrik Delport;Luc Labey;Ronny De Corte;Bernardo Innocenti;Bernardo Innocenti

Frequent Co-Authors

Ignace Naert
Ignace Naert KU Leuven
Ilse Jonkers
Ilse Jonkers KU Leuven
Liesbet Geris
Liesbet Geris University of Liège
Robert Puers
Robert Puers KU Leuven
Wim Desmet
Wim Desmet KU Leuven
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven
John A. Jansen
John A. Jansen Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Engineering and Technology offers a broad range of online degrees that can shape diverse career paths. One rapidly growing area is user experience and interface design, with online ux degree programs enabling students to develop in-demand digital product skills. These programs often lead to careers in tech companies, startups, or as freelance designers.

For those interested in managing complex technical projects, understanding what can you do with a project management degree is crucial. Project management expertise is highly valued across industries such as construction, software development, and engineering services, opening doors to roles like project coordinator or operations manager.

Innovative sectors like fintech and blockchain are also seeing a rise in remote learning options. Earning a cryptocurrency degree can prepare graduates for cutting-edge positions in financial technology, cyber security, or blockchain development.

Lastly, for those with a passion for both technology and sports, the online sports degree path blends athletics, innovation, and management. This can lead to opportunities in sports analytics, event coordination, or facility management, often within technologically advanced environments.

Best Scientists Citing Jos Vander Sloten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles