World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Danny G. Kaloupek

Danny G. Kaloupek

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
20079
World Ranking
5537
National Ranking
3020

Danny G. Kaloupek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny G. Kaloupek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Danny G. Kaloupek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny G. Kaloupek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danny G. Kaloupek is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on scientific research, but specific details regarding their research topics, publications, and fields of study are not available.

There are no recorded recent papers or a list of prior publications attributed to this scientist in the documented data. Consequently, no information about specific research articles, years of publication, or venues can be provided.

Information regarding frequent co-authors or common publication venues has not been documented. Likewise, data on book publications or the publishers associated with their work is absent.

No details are available addressing the main fields or subfields of study related to their research activities. Additionally, no particular topics of work have been listed in the source data.

There are no records of awards or honors attributed to Danny G. Kaloupek in the given information. The scientist is noted as living, indicating ongoing or potential future contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale.

    Dudley David Blake;Frank W. Weathers;Linda M. Nagy;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD. The CAPS-1

    D D Blake;F W Weathers;L M Nagy;D G Kaloupek

  • The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans.

    Frank W. Weathers;Michelle J. Bovin;Daniel J. Lee;Denise M. Sloan

  • The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and Evaluation Within a Veteran Primary Care Sample

    Annabel Prins;Annabel Prins;Michelle J. Bovin;Michelle J. Bovin;Derek J. Smolenski;Brian P. Marx;Brian P. Marx

  • Neural correlates of exposure to traumatic pictures and sound in Vietnam combat veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study

    J.Douglas Bremner;Lawrence H Staib;Danny Kaloupek;Danny Kaloupek;Steven M Southwick

  • Post-stroke depression: relationships to functional impairment, coping strategies, and rehabilitation outcome.

    D Sinyor;P Amato;D G Kaloupek;R Becker

  • The Risks and Benefits of Participating in Trauma-Focused Research Studies

    Elana Newman;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • Emotional processing in posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Brett T. Litz;Susan M. Orsillo;Danny Kaloupek;Frank Weathers

  • A meta-analytic examination of basal cardiovascular activity in posttraumatic stress disorder

    Todd C. Buckley;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, physiological reactivity, alcohol problems, and aggression among military veterans.

    Casey T. Taft;Danny G. Kaloupek;Jeremiah A. Schumm;Amy D. Marshall

  • Decreased anterior cingulate volume in combat-related PTSD.

    Steven H. Woodward;Danny G. Kaloupek;Danny G. Kaloupek;Chris C. Streeter;Christelle Martinez

  • Utility of Psychophysiological Measurement in the Diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Results From a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study

    Terence M. Keane;Lawrence C. Kolb;Danny G. Kaloupek;Scott P. Orr

  • Poststroke depression and lesion location. An attempted replication.

    David Sinyor;Phyllis Jacques;Danny G. Kaloupek;Rubin Becker

  • Externalizing and internalizing subtypes of combat-related PTSD: a replication and extension using the PSY-5 scales.

    Mark W. Miller;Danny G. Kaloupek;Amy L. Dillon;Terence M. Keane

  • Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view

    Elana Newman;Traci Willard;Robert Sinclair;Danny Kaloupek

  • Imaginal flooding in the treatment of a posttraumatic stress disorder

    Terence M. Keane;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • Evaluation of a clinically relevant target behavior for analog outcome research

    Unknown

  • Comorbid psychiatric disorders in PTSD : implications for research

    Terence M. Keane;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale

    Dudley David Blake;Frank W. Weathers;Linda M. Nagy;Danny G. Kaloupek

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Use of Health Services

    Eva Y. Deykin;Terence M. Keane;Danny Kaloupek;Graeme Fincke

  • Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5

    Frank W. Weathers;Michelle J. Bovin;Daniel J. Lee;Denise M. Sloan

Frequent Co-Authors

Terence M. Keane
Terence M. Keane Boston University
Brian P. Marx
Brian P. Marx Boston University
Frank W. Weathers
Frank W. Weathers Auburn University
Mark W. Miller
Mark W. Miller Boston University
Denise M. Sloan
Denise M. Sloan Boston University
Elana Newman
Elana Newman University of Tulsa
Stephan Eliez
Stephan Eliez University of Geneva
Erika J. Wolf
Erika J. Wolf Boston University
Marie Schaer
Marie Schaer University of Geneva
Paula P. Schnurr
Paula P. Schnurr Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology programs in the USA offer flexible pathways into a variety of rewarding careers. When considering a degree in psychology, it’s important to understand how long is a psychology degree, as program lengths can vary significantly—from quick certificates to doctoral tracks like a PsyD.

For those interested in criminal justice, a specialization in forensic psychology can be an excellent choice. Be sure to review the forensic psychology salary data to understand earning potential and job demand in this field.

Students aiming for clinical practice might pursue a psyd in clinical psychology. This doctoral degree emphasizes hands-on practice and is essential for those seeking roles in therapy or mental health counseling.

Another growing area is industrial-organizational psychology, which applies psychological principles to workplace environments. If you’re curious about your job options, check out jobs in io psychology for a detailed overview of in-demand careers at the intersection of psychology and business.

Best Scientists Citing Danny G. Kaloupek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles