World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
3104
World Ranking
10684
National Ranking
516

Sebastian Wachs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Wachs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sebastian Wachs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Wachs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Bullying Intervention in Schools: A Multilevel Analysis of Teachers’ Success in Handling Bullying From the Students’ Perspective

    Unknown

  • Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: differences by participant role

    Unknown

  • Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination-a multi-country study.

    Elisabeth R Pelikan;Selma Korlat;Julia Reiter;Julia Holzer

  • Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright

  • Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright;Alexander T. Vazsonyi

  • Assessing image-based sexual abuse: Measurement, prevalence, and temporal stability of sextortion and nonconsensual sexting ("revenge porn") among adolescents.

    Unknown

  • How Are Consensual, Non-Consensual, and Pressured Sexting Linked to Depression and Self-Harm? The Moderating Effects of Demographic Variables.

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright;Manuel Gámez-Guadix;Nicola Döring

  • The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: The moderating effect of online disinhibition

    Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright;Bridgette D. Harper;Sebastian Wachs

  • Adolescent well-being and learning in times of COVID-19-A multi-country study of basic psychological need satisfaction, learning behavior, and the mediating roles of positive emotion and intrinsic motivation.

    Julia Holzer;Selma Korlat;Christian Haider;Martin Mayerhofer

  • Online Hate Speech Victimization and Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents: The Protective Role of Resilience

    Unknown

  • A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena

    Unknown

  • Adolescents’ motivations to perpetrate hate speech and links with social norms

    Unknown

  • Traditional, Cyber and Combined Bullying Roles: Differences in Risky Online and Offline Activities

    Unknown

  • Students' basic needs and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A two-country study of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic learning motivation, positive emotion and the moderating role of self-regulated learning.

    Julia Holzer;Marko Lüftenegger;Udo Käser;Selma Korlat

  • The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety

    Michelle F. Wright;Sebastian Wachs;Bridgette D. Harper

  • The Moderation of Online Disinhibition and Sex on the Relationship Between Online Hate Victimization and Perpetration.

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle Faye Wright

  • “DNT LET ’EM H8 U!”: Applying the routine activity framework to understand cyberhate victimization among adolescents across eight countries

    Sebastian Wachs;Sebastian Wachs;Matthew Costello;Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright;Katerina Flora

  • A cross-national study of direct and indirect effects of cyberbullying on cybergrooming victimization via self-esteem

    Sebastian Wachs;Gabriela Ksinan Jiskrova;Alexander T. Vazsonyi;Karsten D. Wolf

  • Associations between Witnessing and Perpetrating Online Hate in Eight Countries: The Buffering Effects of Problem-Focused Coping.

    Sebastian Wachs;Michelle F. Wright;Ruthaychonnee Sittichai;Ritu Singh

  • Online correlates of cyberhate involvement among young people from ten European countries: An application of the Routine Activity and Problem Behaviour Theory

    Sebastian Wachs;Sebastian Wachs;Angela Mazzone;Tijana Milosevic;Michelle F. Wright;Michelle F. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle F. Wright
Michelle F. Wright Indiana State University
Manuel Gámez-Guadix
Manuel Gámez-Guadix Autonomous University of Madrid
Jun Sung Hong
Jun Sung Hong Wayne State University
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University
Katariina Salmela-Aro
Katariina Salmela-Aro University of Helsinki
Christiane Spiel
Christiane Spiel University of Vienna
Sheri Bauman
Sheri Bauman University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sebastian Wachs