World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Russia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 79 231 209 1 1 370 17392

Mikhail A. Sheremet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mikhail A. Sheremet between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mikhail A. Sheremet published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 26.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2023. 67 of the 558 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2023. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 51 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 63 publications 2022: 58 publications 2023: 64 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 38 publications
2005 2025

558 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mikhail A. Sheremet: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 6
2010 10
2011 12
2012 4
2013 8
2014 11
2015 27
2016 38
2017 35
2018 51
2019 46
2020 48
2021 63
2022 58
2023 64
2024 29
2025 38
Total 558
Download as CSV

Mikhail A. Sheremet publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail A. Sheremet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 367–376 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 370 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36 370
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mikhail A. Sheremet D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail A. Sheremet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16 79
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Russia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in Russia Leader Award

Overview

Mikhail A. Sheremet is affiliated with the National Research Tomsk State University in the Russian Federation. Their research primarily focuses on engineering with a significant emphasis on mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering, computational mechanics, renewable energy, sustainability, environment, and ocean engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the field of heat and fluid flow, particularly through studies on nanofluid flow and heat transfer, heat transfer mechanisms, and optimization, as well as fluid dynamics and turbulent flows. Other main topics of Sheremet's work include phase change materials research, heat and mass transfer in porous media, and solar thermal and photovoltaic systems.

Sheremet has published widely in several scientific venues, including:

  • International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow
  • Journal of Energy Storage
  • International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
  • International Journal of Thermal Sciences

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sheremet include Mohammad Ghalambaz, Mohsen Izadi, Nadezhda S. Bondareva, Ahmad Hajjar, and Hakan F. Öztop.

Recent published papers include:

  • Natural convection flow of a suspension containing nano-encapsulated phase change particles in an eccentric annulus, 2020, Journal of Energy Storage
  • Natural convection of a hybrid nanofluid affected by an inclined periodic magnetic field within a porous medium, 2020, Chinese Journal of Physics
  • Effect of nanoparticle shape on the performance of thermal systems utilizing nanofluids: A critical review, 2020, Journal of Molecular Liquids
  • Mixed convection of hybrid nanofluid in a porous trapezoidal chamber, 2020, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Melting heat transfer of power-law non-Newtonian phase change nano-enhanced n-octadecane-mesoporous silica (MPSiO2), 2020, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

Best Publications

  • Convective Flow and Heat Transfer from Wavy Surfaces: Viscous Fluids, Porous Media, and Nanofluids

    Aroon Shenoy;Mikhail Sheremet;Ioan Pop

  • Variable magnetic forces impact on magnetizable hybrid nanofluid heat transfer through a circular cavity

    M. Sheikholeslami;S.A.M. Mehryan;Ahmad Shafee;Mikhail A. Sheremet

  • MHD natural convection in an inclined wavy cavity with corner heater filled with a nanofluid

    Mikhail Alexandrovich Sheremet;Mikhail Alexandrovich Sheremet;H. F. Oztop;I. Pop

  • Free Convection in a Square Cavity Filled with a Porous Medium Saturated by Nanofluid Using Tiwari and Das’ Nanofluid Model

    M. A. Sheremet;M. A. Sheremet;T. Grosan;I. Pop

  • Numerical simulation of natural convection heat transfer inside a ┴ shaped cavity filled by a MWCNT-Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluids using LBM

    Mohsen Izadi;Rasul Mohebbi;Davood Karimi;Mikhail A. Sheremet

  • Numerical study of MHD nanofluid natural convection in a baffled U-shaped enclosure

    Yuan Ma;Rasul Mohebbi;M.M. Rashidi;Zhigang Yang

  • Conjugate natural convection in a square porous cavity filled by a nanofluid using Buongiorno’s mathematical model

    Mikhail Alexandrovich Sheremet;Mikhail Alexandrovich Sheremet;I. Pop

  • Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Conjugate Natural Convection of Hybrid Water-Based Nanofluid in a Semicircular Cavity

    Ali J. Chamkha;Igor V. Miroshnichenko;Mikhail A. Sheremet;Mikhail A. Sheremet

  • MHD natural convection and entropy generation of ferrofluid in an open trapezoidal cavity partially filled with a porous medium

    Marina S. Astanina;Mikhail A. Sheremet;Hakan F. Oztop;Nidal Abu-Hamdeh

  • Natural convection in an inclined cavity with time-periodic temperature boundary conditions using nanofluids: Application in solar collectors

    M.A. Sheremet;M.A. Sheremet;I. Pop;O. Mahian

  • Natural convection flow of a suspension containing nano-encapsulated phase change particles in an eccentric annulus

    S.A.M. Mehryan;Mohammad Ghalambaz;Leila Sasani Gargari;Ahmad Hajjar

  • Natural convection and entropy generation of a ferrofluid in a square enclosure under the effect of a horizontal periodic magnetic field

    S.A.M. Mehryan;Mohsen Izadi;Ali J. Chamkha;Ali J. Chamkha;Mikhail A. Sheremet

  • Three-dimensional natural convection in a porous enclosure filled with a nanofluid using Buongiorno's mathematical model

    M.A. Sheremet;M.A. Sheremet;I. Pop;M.M. Rahman

  • Natural Convection in a Square Porous Cavity with Sinusoidal Temperature Distributions on Both Side Walls Filled with a Nanofluid: Buongiorno’s Mathematical Model

    M. A. Sheremet;M. A. Sheremet;I. Pop

  • Turbulent natural convection heat transfer in rectangular enclosures using experimental and numerical approaches: A review

    I.V. Miroshnichenko;M.A. Sheremet

  • MHD free convection in a wavy open porous tall cavity filled with nanofluids under an effect of corner heater

    M.A. Sheremet;M.A. Sheremet;H.F. Oztop;I. Pop;K. Al-Salem

  • Magnetic field effect on the unsteady natural convection in a wavy-walled cavity filled with a nanofluid: Buongiorno's mathematical model

    Mikhail A. Sheremet;Mikhail A. Sheremet;Ioan Pop;Natalia C. Roşca

  • Heat transfer performance of the finned nano-enhanced phase change material system under the inclination influence

    Nadezhda S. Bondareva;Bernardo Buonomo;Oronzio Manca;Mikhail A. Sheremet

  • Free convection in a partially heated wavy porous cavity filled with a nanofluid under the effects of Brownian diffusion and thermophoresis

    M.A. Sheremet;M.A. Sheremet;D.S. Cimpean;I. Pop

  • MHD natural convection and entropy generation of ferrofluids in a cavity with a non-uniformly heated horizontal plate

    C. Sivaraj;M.A. Sheremet

  • Mixed convection in a lid-driven square cavity filled by a nanofluid

    M.A. Sheremet;I. Pop

Frequent Co-Authors

Ioan Pop
Ioan Pop Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Hakan F. Oztop
Hakan F. Oztop Fırat University
Geniy V. Kuznetsov
Geniy V. Kuznetsov Tomsk Polytechnic University
Nidal Abu-Hamdeh
Nidal Abu-Hamdeh King Abdulaziz University
Ali J. Chamkha
Ali J. Chamkha Kuwait College of Science and Technology
Mohsen Izadi
Mohsen Izadi Lorestan University
Ammar I. Alsabery
Ammar I. Alsabery Islamic University of Najaf
S.A.M. Mehryan
S.A.M. Mehryan Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Teodor Grosan
Teodor Grosan Babeș-Bolyai University
Mohammad Ghalambaz
Mohammad Ghalambaz Ton Duc Thang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their skillset beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, several online degree programs offer flexible and accelerated options. For example, accelerated speech pathology programs can be a great choice for students looking to enter healthcare fields quickly while leveraging their strong technical background.

Alternatively, individuals fascinated by behavioral analysis and criminology might explore a career as an FBI profiler. Understanding the education, salary, and job outlook for FBI profilers can help engineering graduates assess how their analytical skills translate into criminal justice roles.

Counseling degrees also represent an interesting pathway for engineers interested in human factors and psychological applications. Researching different types of counseling degrees can help pinpoint a specialty that matches personal interests and career goals.

For those seeking a less time-intensive route into counseling, exploring the easiest counseling degrees available online could offer a practical stepping stone without requiring a full traditional campus commitment.

Each of these related programs demonstrates the versatility of an engineering foundation when combined with interdisciplinary studies. To learn more, consider exploring the links for accelerated SLP programs, FBI profiler, types of counseling degrees, and easiest counseling degrees for tailored advice and options.

Best Scientists Citing Mikhail A. Sheremet

Trending Scientists