World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
4138
World Ranking
11362
National Ranking
103

Aïna Chalabaev publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aïna Chalabaev sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Aïna Chalabaev D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aïna Chalabaev sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: review and future directions.

    Aïna Chalabaev;Philippe Sarrazin;Paul Fontayne;Julie Boiché

  • Relationships between changes in self-reported physical activity, sedentary behaviour and health during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in France and Switzerland.

    Boris Cheval;Hamsini Sivaramakrishnan;Silvio Maltagliati;Layan Fessler

  • “Feeling Younger, Being Stronger”: An Experimental Study of Subjective Age and Physical Functioning Among Older Adults

    Yannick Stephan;Aïna Chalabaev;Dana Kotter-Grühn;Alban Jaconelli

  • Relative age is associated with sport dropout: evidence from youth categories of French basketball.

    Nicolas Delorme;Aïna Chalabaev;Michel Raspaud

  • Do achievement goals mediate stereotype threat?: an investigation on females' soccer performance.

    Aïna Chalabaev;Philippe Sarrazin;Jeff Stone;François Cury

  • Subjective Health and Memory Self-Efficacy as Mediators in the Relation between Subjective Age and Life Satisfaction among Older Adults

    Yannick Stephan;Johan Caudroit;Aïna Chalabaev

  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Physical Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Unknown

  • Aging stereotypes and active lifestyle: Personal correlates of stereotype internalization and relationships with level of physical activity among older adults

    Mélanie Emile;Aina Chalabaev;Yannick Stephan;Karine Corrion

  • Physiological markers of challenge and threat mediate the effects of performance-based goals on performance

    Aïna Chalabaev;Aïna Chalabaev;Brenda Major;François Cury;Philippe Sarrazin

  • Stereotype endorsement and perceived ability as mediators of the girls' gender orientation-soccer performance relationship

    Aïna Chalabaev;Philippe Sarrazin;Paul Fontayne

  • Investigating Physiological and Self-Reported Mediators of Stereotype Lift Effects on a Motor Task

    Aïna Chalabaev;Jeff Stone;Philippe Sarrazin;Jean Claude Croizet

  • When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals

    Aïna Chalabaev;Aïna Chalabaev;Aïna Chalabaev;Brenda Major;Philippe Sarrazin;François Cury

  • Can Sex-Undifferentiated Teacher Expectations Mask an Influence of Sex Stereotypes? Alternative Forms of Sex Bias in Teacher Expectations

    Aïna Chalabaev;Philippe Sarrazin;David Trouilloud;Lee Jussim

  • Subjective Age and Social-Cognitive Determinants of Physical Activity in Active Older Adults

    Johan Caudroit;Yannick Stephan;Aina Chalabaev;Christine Le Scanff

  • Motivation in the Athens Classic Marathon: The Role of Sex, Age, and Performance Level in Greek Recreational Marathon Runners

    Pantelis T Nikolaidis;Aïna Chalabaev;Thomas Rosemann;Beat Knechtle;Beat Knechtle

  • Relationships Between Changes in Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviours and Health During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in France and Switzerland

    Unknown

  • Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID-19 lockdown.

    Silvio Maltagliati;Amanda Rebar;Layan Fessler;Cyril Forestier

  • How perceived autonomy support and controlling coach behaviors are related to well- and ill-being in elite soccer players: A within-person changes and between-person differences analysis

    Boris Cheval;Boris Cheval;Aïna Chalabaev;Eleanor Quested;Delphine S. Courvoisier

  • Motivation in ultra-marathon runners.

    Zbigniew Waśkiewicz;Pantelis T Nikolaidis;Aïna Chalabaev;Thomas Rosemann

  • Cognitive resources moderate the adverse impact of poor perceived neighborhood conditions on self-reported physical activity of older adults.

    Boris Cheval;Amanda L. Rebar;Matthew W. Miller;Stefan Sieber

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Sarrazin
Philippe Sarrazin Grenoble Alpes University
Boris Cheval
Boris Cheval École Normale Supérieure de Rennes
Stéphane Cullati
Stéphane Cullati University of Fribourg
Yannick Stephan
Yannick Stephan University of Montpellier
David Sander
David Sander University of Geneva
Amanda L. Rebar
Amanda L. Rebar Central Queensland University
Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Jeff Stone
Jeff Stone University of Arizona
Nikos Ntoumanis
Nikos Ntoumanis University of Southern Denmark
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Aïna Chalabaev

Recently Published Articles