World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
8070
World Ranking
10043
National Ranking
5292

Julie C. Bowker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie C. Bowker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Julie C. Bowker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie C. Bowker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie C. Bowker is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Additional involvement is noted in the fields of Education and Sociology and Political Science.

The researcher's work extensively addresses topics related to Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression. Other central research areas include Youth Substance Use and School Attendance, Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, and issues surrounding Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Julie C. Bowker's publication record includes contributions to several peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in:

  • International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Social Development
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence

Some recent papers include:

  • "Social Withdrawal and Aloneliness in Adolescence: Examining the Implications of Too Much and Not Enough Solitude," 2021, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Time alone well spent? A person-centered analysis of adolescents' solitary activities," 2021, Social Development
  • "Normative Beliefs about Social Withdrawal in Adolescence," 2021, Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Temporal approaches to the study of friendship: Understanding the developmental significance of friendship change during childhood and adolescence," 2022, Advances in Child Development and Behavior
  • "Associations Between Callous-Unemotional Traits and Peer-Rated Social-Behavioral Outcomes in Elementary and Middle School," 2020, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include Robert J. Coplan, Kenneth H. Rubin, Jenna P. Weingarten, Hope I. White, and Rebecca G. Etkin.

Best Publications

  • Social withdrawal in childhood

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Robert J. Coplan;Julie C. Bowker

  • Peer Relationships in Childhood

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Julie C. Bowker;Kristina L. McDonald;Melissa Menzer

  • Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors.

    Sarah-Jeanne Salvy;Kayla de la Haye;Julie C. Bowker;Roel C.J. Hermans

  • Children in Peer Groups

    Kenneth H. Rubin;William M. Bukowski;Julie C. Bowker

  • Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence.

    Wonjung Oh;Kenneth H. Rubin;Julie C. Bowker;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Effect of Peers and Friends on Youth Physical Activity and Motivation to be Physically Active

    Sarah-Jeanne Salvy;James N. Roemmich;Julie C. Bowker;Natalie D. Romero

  • Social withdrawal subtypes during early adolescence in India.

    Julie C. Bowker;Radhi Raja

  • Behavioral Characteristics Associated with Stable and Fluid Best Friendship Patterns in Middle Childhood

    Julie C. Wojslawowicz Bowker;Kenneth H. Rubin;Kim B. Burgess;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Interactions Between Rejection Sensitivity and Supportive Relationships in the Prediction of Adolescents’ Internalizing Difficulties

    Kristina L. McDonald;Julie C. Bowker;Kenneth H. Rubin;Brett Laursen

  • Social withdrawal and shyness.

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Robert J. Coplan;Julie C. Bowker;Melissa Menzer

  • Future Directions in…Friendship in Childhood and Early Adolescence.

    Kenneth Rubin;Bridget Fredstrom;Julie Bowker

  • The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone.

    Robert J. Coplan;Julie C. Bowker

  • Seeking more solitude: Conceptualization, assessment, and implications of aloneliness.

    Robert J. Coplan;Will E. Hipson;Kristen A. Archbell;Laura L. Ooi

  • Interpersonal Goals and Susceptibility to Peer Influence: Risk Factors for Intentions to Initiate Substance Use During Early Adolescence

    Elisa M. Trucco;Craig R. Colder;Julie C. Bowker;William F. Wieczorek

  • Avoiding and withdrawing from the peer group.

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Julie C. Bowker;Matthew G. Barstead;Robert J. Coplan

  • Self-consciousness, friendship quality, and adolescent internalizing problems.

    Julie C. Bowker;Kenneth H. Rubin

  • Impact of simulated ostracism on overweight and normal-weight youths' motivation to eat and food intake.

    Sarah-Jeanne Salvy;Julie C. Bowker;Lauren A. Nitecki;Melissa A. Kluczynski

  • Parents, Peers, and Social Withdrawal in Childhood: A Relationship Perspective

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Amy Kennedy Root;Julie Bowker

  • Influence of peers and friends on overweight/obese youths' physical activity.

    Sarah-Jeanne Salvy;Julie C. Bowker;Lisa Germeroth;Jacob Barkley

  • Contributions of Racial and Sociobehavioral Homophily to Friendship Stability and Quality Among Same-Race and Cross-Race Friends:

    Kristina L. McDonald;Ebony Dashiell-Aje;Melissa M. Menzer;Kenneth H. Rubin

  • How BIS/BAS and psycho-behavioral variables distinguish between social withdrawal subtypes during emerging adulthood

    Julie C. Bowker;Miriam T. Stotsky;Rebecca G. Etkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth H. Rubin
Kenneth H. Rubin University of Maryland, College Park
Robert J. Coplan
Robert J. Coplan Carleton University
Cathryn Booth-LaForce
Cathryn Booth-LaForce University of Washington
Linda Rose-Krasnor
Linda Rose-Krasnor Brock University
Brett Laursen
Brett Laursen Florida Atlantic University
Craig R. Colder
Craig R. Colder University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Leonard H. Epstein
Leonard H. Epstein University at Buffalo, State University of New York
William F. Wieczorek
William F. Wieczorek Buffalo State College
Xinyin Chen
Xinyin Chen University of Pennsylvania
Junsheng Liu
Junsheng Liu East China Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways. One prominent option is pursuing a career as a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a field that combines psychology, linguistics, and health sciences. Many states in the US offer unique requirements and certification processes for SLP professionals.

For instance, those interested in practicing in North Carolina should review the North Carolina slp certification requirements to understand educational prerequisites and licensure steps. Similarly, information on becoming a speech therapist in North Dakota highlights the importance of accredited programs and state-specific exams.

If Ohio is your target location, be sure to check out the Ohio speech pathologist certification requirements. For those considering opportunities in Oklahoma, understanding the slp requirements in Oklahoma is essential.

By choosing an online psychology degree or allied path like speech-language pathology, you can pave the way for flexible, rewarding careers that impact lives across diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Julie C. Bowker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles