World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cathryn Booth-LaForce

Cathryn Booth-LaForce

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2492 2280 1443 1291 159 16193

Cathryn Booth-LaForce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cathryn Booth-LaForce between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cathryn Booth-LaForce published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 10 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
1973 2025

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cathryn Booth-LaForce: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 5
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 10
2004 8
2005 2
2006 9
2007 3
2008 8
2009 3
2010 7
2011 6
2012 3
2013 7
2014 13
2015 3
2016 9
2017 6
2018 2
2019 5
2020 3
2021 11
2022 4
2023 9
2024 7
2025 3
Total 182
Download as CSV

Cathryn Booth-LaForce publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathryn Booth-LaForce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 159
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cathryn Booth-LaForce D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cathryn Booth-LaForce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cathryn Booth-LaForce is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research intersects psychology and medicine, with a significant focus on clinical psychology and public health. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and education.

Their scholarly contributions emphasize child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, attachment and relationship dynamics, birth, development, and health, child abuse and trauma, obesity, physical activity, diet, and early childhood education and development.

Some of the frequent venues where Booth-LaForce has published include:

  • Infant and Child Development
  • Developmental Psychology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Psychological Science
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Frequent co-authors in Booth-LaForce's collaborations are:

  • Glenn I. Roisman
  • Maria E. Bleil
  • Bradley M. Appelhans
  • Steven E. Gregorich
  • Marissa D. Nivison

Representative recent papers include:

  • Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Retrospective Assessments of the Quality of Childhood Parenting: Prospective Evidence From Infancy to Age 26 Years, 2021, Psychological Science
  • Preexisting Executive Function Deficits and Change in Health Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • Early Life Adversity and Pubertal Timing: Implications for Cardiometabolic Health, 2020, Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • Disparities in COVID-19-related stressful life events in the United States: Understanding who is most impacted, 2021, Health & Social Care in the Community
  • Does secure base script knowledge mediate associations between observed parental caregiving during childhood and adult romantic relationship quality and health?, 2020, Attachment & Human Development

Best Publications

  • Child Care and Mother-Child Interaction in the First Three Years of Life

    M Appelbaum;DA Batten;J Belsky;C Booth

  • Attachment, Friendship, and Psychosocial Functioning in Early Adolescence

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Kathleen M. Dwyer;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Angel H. Kim

  • The relation of child care to cognitive and language development

    A Clarke-Stewart;S Friedman;Dane Phillips;CL Booth

  • The Best Friendships of Shy/Withdrawn Children: Prevalence, Stability, and Relationship Quality

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Julie C. Wojslawowicz;Linda Rose-Krasnor;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Nonmaternal Care and Family Factors in Early Development: An Overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care

    Virginia Allhusen;Mark Appelbaum;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth

  • Maternal sensitivity to infant distress and nondistress as predictors of infant-mother attachment security.

    Nancy L. McElwain;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Duration and Developmental Timing of Poverty and Children's Cognitive and Social Development from Birth Through Third Grade.

    Virginia Allhusen;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley

  • Social Information Processing and Coping Strategies of Shy/Withdrawn and Aggressive Children: Does Friendship Matter?

    Kim B. Burgess;Julie C. Wojslawowicz;Kenneth H. Rubin;Linda Rose-Krasnor

  • Mothers' and Fathers' Perceptions of Daily Hassles of Parenting across Early Childhood.

    Keith A. Crnic;Cathryn L. Booth

  • Child-care effect sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

    A Huston;C. Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;C. Brownell

  • Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence.

    Wonjung Oh;Kenneth H. Rubin;Julie C. Bowker;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Interpersonal and genetic origins of adult attachment styles: A longitudinal study from infancy to early adulthood.

    R. Chris Fraley;Glenn I. Roisman;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Margaret Tresch Owen

  • Effects of parental separation and divorce on very young children.

    K. Alison Clarke-Stewart;Deborah L. Vandell;Kathleen McCartney;Margaret T. Owen

  • Familial factors associated with the characteristics of nonmaternal care for infants

    Mark Appelbaum;Dee Ann Batten;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth

  • Trajectories of Social Withdrawal from Grades 1 to 6: Prediction from Early Parenting, Attachment, and Temperament

    Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Monica L. Oxford

  • Child care and children's peer interaction at 24 and 36 months: The NICHD study of early child care - NICHD early child care research network

    Mark Appelbaum;Dee Ann Batten;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth

  • Does Quality of Child Care Affect Child Outcomes at Age 4 1 ⁄ 2?

    N Marshall;CA Brownell;M Burchinal;B Caldwell

  • Type of child care and children's development at 54 months

    Virginia Allhusen;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth;Robert Bradley

  • Infant-mother attachment classification: Risk and protection in relation to changing maternal caregiving quality

    Jay Belsky;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;Celia A. Brownell

  • Behavioral Characteristics Associated with Stable and Fluid Best Friendship Patterns in Middle Childhood

    Julie C. Wojslawowicz Bowker;Kenneth H. Rubin;Kim B. Burgess;Cathryn Booth-LaForce

  • Child-care and family predictors of preschool attachment and stability from infancy

    M Appelbaum;J Belsky;C Booth;R Bradley

  • Duration and Developmental Timing of Poverty and Children's Cognitive and Social Development From Birth Through Third Grade National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network

    Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;Celia A. Brownell

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn I. Roisman
Glenn I. Roisman University of Minnesota
Kenneth H. Rubin
Kenneth H. Rubin University of Maryland, College Park
Linda Rose-Krasnor
Linda Rose-Krasnor Brock University
Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
Susan J. Spieker
Susan J. Spieker University of Washington
Brett Laursen
Brett Laursen Florida Atlantic University
Margaret Tresch Owen
Margaret Tresch Owen The University of Texas at Dallas
Margaret Burchinal
Margaret Burchinal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Martha J. Cox
Martha J. Cox University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kristine E. Ensrud
Kristine E. Ensrud University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and specialized career pathways—particularly in counseling, social work, and mental health services. Online psychology degrees provide flexibility, making it easier for students and working professionals to balance their studies and other commitments.

Many graduates choose to make a difference in their communities by becoming substance abuse counselors. This rewarding career involves supporting individuals on their recovery journeys and requires specific educational and licensing criteria that may vary by city or state. For those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fremont, as well as becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fresno, it’s important to understand the local requirements for training and certification.

Other cities, such as Garland and Gilbert, also have their own pathways; you can learn more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Garland and becoming a substance abuse counselor in Gilbert. Exploring these options can help you find a career that matches your goals and meets important needs within your community.

Best Scientists Citing Cathryn Booth-LaForce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles