World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
41335
World Ranking
5597
National Ranking
3011

Thomas W. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Smith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 626 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas W. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Smith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas W. Smith is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work spans various subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Research topics covered in Smith's publications include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Smith include:

  • "Mouse closed head traumatic brain injury replicates the histological tau pathology pattern of human disease: characterization of a novel model and systematic review of the literature," 2021, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • "Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion," 2023, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "MitraClip Implantation Guided by Volumetric Intracardiac Echocardiography: Technique and Feasibility in Patients Intolerant to Transesophageal Echocardiography," 2021, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • "3D Navigation and Intraprocedural Intracardiac Echocardiography Imaging for Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair," 2024, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "First-in-Human Transfemoral Transseptal Mitral Valve Chordal Repair," 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Smith has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Jason H. Rogers
  • Gagan D. Singh
  • Edris Aman
  • Jonathan Yap
  • Tai Pham

Publication venues frequently featuring Smith's work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Structural Heart
  • The Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Smith has also contributed to book publications, including a title released in 2024:

  • Rewriting the First Crusade (published by Boydell and Brewer eBooks)

Best Publications

  • Intracellular heterogeneity in mitochondrial membrane potentials revealed by a J-aggregate-forming lipophilic cation JC-1.

    Stephen T. Smiley;Martin Reers;Cristina Mottola-Hartshorn;Mei Lin

  • Nitric Oxide and Cardiac Function

    Ralph A. Kelly;Jean-Luc Balligand;Thomas W. Smith

  • Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Targeting to Caveolae: SPECIFIC INTERACTIONS WITH CAVEOLIN ISOFORMS IN CARDIAC MYOCYTES AND ENDOTHELIAL CELLS *

    Olivier Feron;Laurent Belhassen;Lester Kobzik;Thomas W. Smith

  • Insulin effects on monovalent cation transport and Na-K-ATPase activity.

    T. J. Hougen;B. E. Hopkins;T. W. Smith

  • Control of cardiac muscle cell function by an endogenous nitric oxide signaling system

    Jean-Luc Balligand;Ralph A. Kelly;Philip A. Marsden;Thomas W. Smith

  • Determination of therapeutic and toxic serum digoxin concentrations by radioimmunoassay.

    Thomas W. Smith;Vincent P. Butler;Edgar Haber

  • Digitalis intoxication. A prospective clinical study with serum level correlations.

    George A. Beller;Thomas W. Smith;Walter H. Abelmann;Edgar Haber

  • Abnormal contractile function due to induction of nitric oxide synthesis in rat cardiac myocytes follows exposure to activated macrophage-conditioned medium.

    Jean-Luc Balligand;D Ungureanu;R A Kelly;L Kobzik

  • Reversal of advanced digoxin intoxication with Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies.

    Thomas W. Smith;Edgar Haber;Lawrence Yeatman;Vincent P. Butler

  • Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments. Final report of a multicenter study.

    E M Antman;T L Wenger;V P Butler;E Haber

  • Nitric Oxide-dependent Parasympathetic Signaling Is Due to Activation of Constitutive Endothelial (Type III) Nitric Oxide Synthase in Cardiac Myocytes

    Jean-Luc Balligand;Lester Kobzik;Xinqiang Han;David M. Kaye

  • Digitalis mechanisms of action and clinical use

    Smith Tw

  • Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration

    Thomas W. Smith;Edgar Haber

  • Endothelin and increased contractility in adult rat ventricular myocytes. Role of intracellular alkalosis induced by activation of the protein kinase C-dependent Na(+)-H+ exchanger.

    Bernhard K. Krämer;T. W. Smith;R. A. Kelly

  • Disruption of Ini1 Leads to Peri-Implantation Lethality and Tumorigenesis in Mice

    Cynthia J. Guidi;Arthur T. Sands;Brian P. Zambrowicz;Tod K. Turner

  • Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes.

    Itamar B. Botser;Thomas W. Smith;Rima Nasser;Benjamin G. Domb

  • Vascular Bed–specific Expression of an Endothelial Cell Gene Is Programmed by the Tissue Microenvironment

    William C. Aird;Jay M. Edelberg;Hartmut Weiler-Guettler;William W. Simmons

  • Inducible nitric oxide synthase in tangle-bearing neurons of patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Y Vodovotz;M S Lucia;K C Flanders;L Chesler

  • An update on immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of multiple sclerosis

    Neeta Garg;Thomas W. Smith

  • Dynamic targeting of the agonist-stimulated m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor to caveolae in cardiac myocytes

    Olivier Feron;Thomas W. Smith;Thomas Michel;Ralph A. Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Greenblatt
David J. Greenblatt Tufts University
Edgar Haber
Edgar Haber Harvard University
Thomas Michel
Thomas Michel Brigham and Women's Hospital
Elliott M. Antman
Elliott M. Antman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lester Kobzik
Lester Kobzik Harvard University
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Marc Fisher
Marc Fisher Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sean W. Hayes
Sean W. Hayes Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Gary E. Wnek
Gary E. Wnek Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine and healthcare, there are a variety of online degree options that can open doors to rewarding careers. Flexible learning formats allow you to balance studies with work or other commitments while advancing your professional qualifications.

If you’re considering health administration, affordable online mha programs are a cost-effective path to leadership positions in healthcare organizations. For nurses aiming to move into advanced practice or leadership, the cheapest dnp online programs provide a convenient route to the highest clinical degree in nursing.

Pharmacy is another vital field, and completing a pharmacy school online accredited program ensures comprehensive training for future pharmacists. On the administrative and technical side, a bachelor of health information management online prepares graduates for managing sensitive health data and information systems.

Exploring these affordable and flexible online programs can help you chart a career pathway in healthcare that matches your ambitions and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles