World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 63 1183 1042 224 200 191 14651

Anna Goodman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna Goodman between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna Goodman published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2014. 16 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2014. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1981 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna Goodman: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 4
2008 7
2009 6
2010 8
2011 15
2012 15
2013 23
2014 34
2015 17
2016 11
2017 11
2018 11
2019 6
2020 11
2021 15
2022 2
2023 1
2024 7
2025 9
Total 216
Download as CSV

Anna Goodman publications per year - data summary

  • Anna Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, has 216 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 34 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 2005, 2006 and 2023, with 1 publication each.
  • 23 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.8 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 34 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1996-2010: 27 publications (1.8 per year); 2011-2025: 188 publications (12.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Anna Goodman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 191 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 191
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna Goodman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Anna Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, records 191 publications - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Anna Goodman, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Anna Goodman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Anna Goodman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77 63
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Anna Goodman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Anna Goodman, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, records 63 D-Index - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Anna Goodman, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Anna Goodman ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Anna Goodman is affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration on Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several subfields, including Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Neurology, Surgery, and Health. Their work encompasses topics such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, COVID-19 clinical research studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, and bacterial identification and susceptibility testing.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Anna Goodman include Parvinder K. Aley, Angela M. Minassian, Yama F Mujadidi, Teresa Lambe, and Saul N. Faust.

Anna Goodman has published in a variety of scientific venues, with multiple contributions to the Journal of Infection, SSRN Electronic Journal, The Lancet, Clinical Infectious Diseases, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK, 2020, The Lancet
  • Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials, 2021, The Lancet
  • Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study, 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet

Best Publications

  • When to Use Broader Internalising and Externalising Subscales Instead of the Hypothesised Five Subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British Parents, Teachers and Children

    Anna Goodman;Donna L. Lamping;George B. Ploubidis

  • Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health.

    Anna Goodman;Robert Goodman

  • Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International children's accelerometry database (ICAD).

    Ashley R. Cooper;Ashley R. Cooper;Anna Goodman;Angie S. Page;Lauren B. Sherar

  • Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study

    James Woodcock;Marko Tainio;Marko Tainio;James Cheshire;Oliver O’Brien

  • Mental Health of Children and Young People in England, 2017

    Katharine Sadler;Tim Vizard;Tamsin Ford;Franziska Marchesell

  • Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain.

    Anna Goodman;Robert Goodman

  • New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study.

    Anna Goodman;Shannon Sahlqvist;David Ogilvie

  • Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling

    Rachel Aldred;James Woodcock;Anna Goodman

  • Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age.

    Rachel Aldred;Bridget Elliott;James David Woodcock;Anna Goodman

  • Mental health and childhood adversities: a longitudinal study in Kabul, Afghanistan.

    Catherine Panter-Brick;Anna Goodman;Wietse Tol;Mark Eggerman

  • Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices

    Anna Goodman;James Cheshire

  • Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society

    Anna Goodman;Ilona Koupil;David W. Lawson

  • The ‘DAWBA bands’ as an ordered-categorical measure of child mental health: description and validation in British and Norwegian samples

    Anna Goodman;Einar Heiervang;Stephan Collishaw;Robert Goodman

  • Migration and autism spectrum disorder: population-based study {

    Cecilia Magnusson;Dheeraj Rai;Anna Goodman;Michael Lundberg

  • Associations between active commuting and physical and mental wellbeing.

    David K. Humphreys;Anna Goodman;David Ogilvie

  • The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning

    Robin Lovelace;Anna Goodman;Rachel Aldred;Nikolai Berkoff

  • The role of bicycle sharing systems in normalising the image of cycling: An observational study of London cyclists.

    Anna Goodman;Judith Green;James Woodcock

  • Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme

    Unknown

  • The Nordic advantage in child mental health: separating health differences from reporting style in a cross-cultural comparison of psychopathology.

    Einar Heiervang;Anna Goodman;Robert Goodman

  • A Life-Course Study of Cognitive Reserve in Dementia—From Childhood to Old Age

    Serhiy Dekhtyar;Hui-Xin Wang;Kirk Scott;Anna Goodman

  • Associations of individual, household and environmental characteristics with carbon dioxide emissions from motorised passenger travel

    Christian Brand;Anna Goodman;Harry Rutter;Yena Song

  • Walking, Cycling and Driving to Work in the English and Welsh 2011 Census: Trends, Socio-Economic Patterning and Relevance to Travel Behaviour in General

    Anna Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachel Aldred
Rachel Aldred University of Westminster
Judith Green
Judith Green King's College London
Phil Edwards
Phil Edwards London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
David Ogilvie
David Ogilvie University of Cambridge
Mark Petticrew
Mark Petticrew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Helen Roberts
Helen Roberts University College London
Robert Goodman
Robert Goodman King's College London
Paul Wilkinson
Paul Wilkinson London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Vikram Patel
Vikram Patel Harvard University
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Esther M. F. van Sluijs University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of opportunities with flexible online learning options now widely available. Many universities in the USA offer accredited online degrees at the bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels, making advanced study accessible to more students.

Those seeking entry-level positions may consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees that allow graduates to quickly step into the professional world. For those interested in advancing their expertise or shifting careers, a variety of online masters programs provide intensive, year-long curriculums in fields like sociology, political science, and history.

For individuals passionate about psychology or human behavior, an online master degree in psychology can lead to diverse roles in counseling, research, or organizational development. Educators and administrators aiming for leadership can accelerate their credentials through accelerated doctoral programs in education online, often designed to be completed in less time than traditional pathways.

No matter the specialization, these online degree pathways offer the flexibility and speed necessary to fit busy lives and evolving career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles