World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
8651
World Ranking
3177
National Ranking
539

Jenna Panter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna Panter sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 139 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jenna Panter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna Panter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jenna Panter is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences with a specific focus on Transportation, Public Health, and Environmental Health issues.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics including Urban Transport and Accessibility, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet, Traffic and Road Safety, Urban Green Space and Health, and Air Quality and Health Impacts. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining transportation systems and public health outcomes.

Panter has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • Health & Place
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • The Lancet Planetary Health

Some recent papers illustrating their research contributions include:

  • "Associations between commute mode and cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality, and cancer incidence, using linked Census data over 25 years in England and Wales: a cohort study" (2020, The Lancet Planetary Health)
  • "Shifting towards healthier transport: carrots or sticks? Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level interventions" (2022, The Lancet Planetary Health)
  • "Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall" (2020, BMJ Global Health)
  • "Scaling up urban infrastructure for physical activity in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond" (2021, The Lancet)
  • "A natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure across the United Kingdom: The Connect2 programme" (2020, Journal of Transport & Health)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including David Ogilvie, Richard Patterson, Esther van Sluijs, Louise Foley, and Christina Xiao. These collaborations underline Panter's engagement within a network of researchers focused on related themes of transportation and health.

Best Publications

  • The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives

    Juliana C N Chan;Lee-Ling Lim;Nicholas J Wareham;Jonathan E Shaw

  • Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: A review and framework for future research

    Jenna R Panter;Andrew P Jones;Esther Mf van Sluijs

  • The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity

    M Hillsdon;J Panter;C Foster;AP Jones

  • Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis

    H. E. Brown;A. J. Atkin;J. Panter;G. Wong

  • Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children

    J R Panter;A P Jones;E M F van Sluijs;S J Griffin

  • Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children's active commuting

    Jenna R. Panter;Andrew P. Jones;Esther M.F. Van Sluijs;Simon J. Griffin

  • Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of British 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young people)

    Esther M. F. van Sluijs;Paula M. L. Skidmore;Kim Mwanza;Andrew P. Jones

  • Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: What do and don't we know?

    Jenna Rachel Panter;Andy Jones

  • Impact of New Transport Infrastructure on Walking, Cycling, and Physical Activity.

    Jenna Panter;Ethan Heinen;Roger Mackett;David Ogilvie

  • Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action: turning the evidence-based medicine paradigm on its head.

    David Ogilvie;Jean Adams;Adrian Bauman;Edward W. Gregg

  • Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: Using social theory to explore everyday commuting

    C. Guell;J. Panter;N.R. Jones;D. Ogilvie

  • School environments and physical activity: The development and testing of an audit tool.

    Natalia R. Jones;Andy P. Jones;Esther M. F. van Sluijs;Jenna Panter

  • Effectiveness and equity impacts of town-wide cycling initiatives in England: A longitudinal, controlled natural experimental study

    Anna Goodman;Jenna Panter;Stephen J. Sharp;David Ogilvie

  • A longitudinal study of the distance that young people walk to school.

    P. Chillón;J. Panter;K. Corder;Andy Jones

  • Independent mobility on the journey to school: A joint cross-sectional and prospective exploration of social and physical environmental influences

    Alison Carver;Jenna R. Panter;Andrew P. Jones;Esther M.F. van Sluijs

  • Impact of changes in mode of travel to work on changes in body mass index: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey

    Adam Martin;Jenna Panter;Marc Suhrcke;David Ogilvie

  • The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge

    Andrew Carse;Anna Goodman;Roger L. Mackett;Jenna Panter

  • Individual, socio-cultural and environmental predictors of uptake and maintenance of active commuting in children: longitudinal results from the SPEEDY study.

    Jenna Panter;Jenna Panter;Kirsten Corder;Kirsten Corder;Simon J Griffin;Simon J Griffin;Andrew P Jones;Andrew P Jones

  • Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure

    David Bruce Ogilvie;Simon James Griffin;Andy Jones;Roger Mackett

  • Activity spaces in studies of the environment and physical activity: A review and synthesis of implications for causality.

    Lindsey Smith;Louise Foley;Jenna Panter

  • Equitable access to exercise facilities.

    Melvyn Hillsdon;Jenna Panter;Charlie Foster;Andy Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

David Ogilvie
David Ogilvie University of Cambridge
Simon J. Griffin
Simon J. Griffin University of Cambridge
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Esther M. F. van Sluijs University of Cambridge
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Charlie Foster
Charlie Foster University of Bristol
Stephen J. Sharp
Stephen J. Sharp University of Cambridge
Anna Goodman
Anna Goodman London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Soren Brage
Soren Brage University of Cambridge
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Kay-Tee Khaw
Kay-Tee Khaw University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of impactful online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in human behavior, pursuing one of the most affordable online psychology degree programs is a popular starting point. These degrees offer flexibility and let students build a solid foundation for roles in counseling, research, or education.

If you are passionate about social work, consider the easiest online msw program. These programs provide streamlined admission processes, making advanced study in social work accessible for more students. This is a key pathway for careers in community outreach, child welfare, or clinical social work.

For those aiming for advanced practice, accredited online psyd programs prepare students for licensure and professional roles as psychologists. Alternatively, family-focused professionals might pursue one of the best online mft programs to quickly become qualified marriage and family therapists.

These flexible online options help you align your education with your career goals, all while accommodating your schedule and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jenna Panter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles