World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3177 2921 539 492 139 8651

Jenna Panter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jenna Panter between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jenna Panter published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 17 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
2006 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jenna Panter: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 0
2010 6
2011 7
2012 4
2013 10
2014 6
2015 8
2016 20
2017 8
2018 8
2019 7
2020 10
2021 10
2022 11
2023 20
2024 11
2025 6
Total 160
Download as CSV

Jenna Panter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna Panter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 139 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 139
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jenna Panter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna Panter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jenna Panter is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences with a specific focus on Transportation, Public Health, and Environmental Health issues.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics including Urban Transport and Accessibility, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet, Traffic and Road Safety, Urban Green Space and Health, and Air Quality and Health Impacts. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining transportation systems and public health outcomes.

Panter has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • Health & Place
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • The Lancet Planetary Health

Some recent papers illustrating their research contributions include:

  • "Associations between commute mode and cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality, and cancer incidence, using linked Census data over 25 years in England and Wales: a cohort study" (2020, The Lancet Planetary Health)
  • "Shifting towards healthier transport: carrots or sticks? Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level interventions" (2022, The Lancet Planetary Health)
  • "Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall" (2020, BMJ Global Health)
  • "Scaling up urban infrastructure for physical activity in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond" (2021, The Lancet)
  • "A natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure across the United Kingdom: The Connect2 programme" (2020, Journal of Transport & Health)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including David Ogilvie, Richard Patterson, Esther van Sluijs, Louise Foley, and Christina Xiao. These collaborations underline Panter's engagement within a network of researchers focused on related themes of transportation and health.

Best Publications

  • The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives

    Juliana C N Chan;Lee-Ling Lim;Nicholas J Wareham;Jonathan E Shaw

  • Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: A review and framework for future research

    Jenna R Panter;Andrew P Jones;Esther Mf van Sluijs

  • The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity

    M Hillsdon;J Panter;C Foster;AP Jones

  • Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis

    H. E. Brown;A. J. Atkin;J. Panter;G. Wong

  • Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children

    J R Panter;A P Jones;E M F van Sluijs;S J Griffin

  • Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children's active commuting

    Jenna R. Panter;Andrew P. Jones;Esther M.F. Van Sluijs;Simon J. Griffin

  • Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of British 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young people)

    Esther M. F. van Sluijs;Paula M. L. Skidmore;Kim Mwanza;Andrew P. Jones

  • Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: What do and don't we know?

    Jenna Rachel Panter;Andy Jones

  • Impact of New Transport Infrastructure on Walking, Cycling, and Physical Activity.

    Jenna Panter;Ethan Heinen;Roger Mackett;David Ogilvie

  • Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: Using social theory to explore everyday commuting

    C. Guell;J. Panter;N.R. Jones;D. Ogilvie

  • School environments and physical activity: The development and testing of an audit tool.

    Natalia R. Jones;Andy P. Jones;Esther M. F. van Sluijs;Jenna Panter

  • Effectiveness and equity impacts of town-wide cycling initiatives in England: A longitudinal, controlled natural experimental study

    Anna Goodman;Jenna Panter;Stephen J. Sharp;David Ogilvie

  • A longitudinal study of the distance that young people walk to school.

    P. Chillón;J. Panter;K. Corder;Andy Jones

  • Independent mobility on the journey to school: A joint cross-sectional and prospective exploration of social and physical environmental influences

    Alison Carver;Jenna R. Panter;Andrew P. Jones;Esther M.F. van Sluijs

  • Impact of changes in mode of travel to work on changes in body mass index: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey

    Adam Martin;Jenna Panter;Marc Suhrcke;David Ogilvie

  • The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge

    Andrew Carse;Anna Goodman;Roger L. Mackett;Jenna Panter

  • Individual, socio-cultural and environmental predictors of uptake and maintenance of active commuting in children: longitudinal results from the SPEEDY study.

    Jenna Panter;Jenna Panter;Kirsten Corder;Kirsten Corder;Simon J Griffin;Simon J Griffin;Andrew P Jones;Andrew P Jones

  • Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure

    David Bruce Ogilvie;Simon James Griffin;Andy Jones;Roger Mackett

  • Activity spaces in studies of the environment and physical activity: A review and synthesis of implications for causality.

    Lindsey Smith;Louise Foley;Jenna Panter

  • Equitable access to exercise facilities.

    Melvyn Hillsdon;Jenna Panter;Charlie Foster;Andy Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

David Ogilvie
David Ogilvie University of Cambridge
Simon J. Griffin
Simon J. Griffin University of Cambridge
Esther M. F. van Sluijs
Esther M. F. van Sluijs University of Cambridge
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Charlie Foster
Charlie Foster University of Bristol
Stephen J. Sharp
Stephen J. Sharp University of Cambridge
Anna Goodman
Anna Goodman London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Soren Brage
Soren Brage University of Cambridge
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Kay-Tee Khaw
Kay-Tee Khaw University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of impactful online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in human behavior, pursuing one of the most affordable online psychology degree programs is a popular starting point. These degrees offer flexibility and let students build a solid foundation for roles in counseling, research, or education.

If you are passionate about social work, consider the easiest online msw program. These programs provide streamlined admission processes, making advanced study in social work accessible for more students. This is a key pathway for careers in community outreach, child welfare, or clinical social work.

For those aiming for advanced practice, accredited online psyd programs prepare students for licensure and professional roles as psychologists. Alternatively, family-focused professionals might pursue one of the best online mft programs to quickly become qualified marriage and family therapists.

These flexible online options help you align your education with your career goals, all while accommodating your schedule and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jenna Panter

Trending Scientists