World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
9439
World Ranking
3611
National Ranking
618

Julia Fox-Rushby publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Fox-Rushby sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 182 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julia Fox-Rushby D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Fox-Rushby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia Fox-Rushby is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and health professions, focusing particularly on the fields of general health professions, economics and econometrics, obstetrics and gynecology, epidemiology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's research contributions encompass a range of topics including health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, chronic disease management strategies, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, primary care and health outcomes, child and adolescent health, acute ischemic stroke management, and gestational diabetes research and management.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Julia Fox-Rushby include:

  • Marina Soley-Bori
  • Ka Keat Lim
  • Charles Wolfe
  • Ingrid Wolfe
  • Peter von Dadelszen

Publications by Julia Fox-Rushby have appeared in a variety of journals. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • Value in Health
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • Trials
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • Nature Communications

A selection of recent papers demonstrates the scope of their research:

  • Gestational diabetes: opportunities for improving maternal and child health (2020) published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature (2020) published in British Journal of General Practice
  • Identifying longitudinal clusters of multimorbidity in an urban setting: A population-based cross-sectional study (2021) published in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • Inequalities in developing multimorbidity over time: A population-based cohort study from an urban, multi-ethnic borough in the United Kingdom (2021) published in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • National surveillance data analysis of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England by women of reproductive age (2023) published in Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach.

    M. Herdman;J. Fox-Rushby;X. Badia

  • WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care

    José Villar;Hassan Ba'aqeel;Gilda Piaggio;Pisake Lumbiganon

  • 'Equivalence' and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires

    M. Herdman;J. Fox-Rushby;X. Badia

  • Calculating and presenting disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in cost-effectiveness analysis.

    J A Fox-Rushby;K Hanson

  • Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature

    Marina Soley-Bori;Mark Ashworth;Alessandra Bisquera;Hiten Dodhia

  • Preventing disease and saving resources: the potential contribution of increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK

    Mary J. Renfrew;Subhash Pokhrel;Maria Quigley;Felicia McCormick

  • A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America.

    Annabel Bowden;Julia A. Fox-Rushby

  • Efficacy and cost of video-assisted thoracoscopic partial pleurectomy versus talc pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MesoVATS): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial

    Robert C Rintoul;Andrew J Ritchie;John G Edwards;David A Waller

  • Methods for pre-testing and piloting survey questions: illustrations from the KENQOL survey of health-related quality of life.

    A Bowden;JA Fox-Rushby;L Nyandieka;J Wanjau

  • Some indicators of socio-economic status may not be reliable and use of indices with these data could worsen equity.

    Obinna Onwujekwe;Obinna Onwujekwe;Kara Hanson;Julia Fox-Rushby

  • Potential economic impacts from improving breastfeeding rates in the UK

    S Pokhrel;M A Quigley;J Fox-Rushby;F McCormick

  • Vaccine-preventable Diseases

    Logan Brenzel;Lara J. Wolfson;Julia Fox-Rushby;Mark Miller

  • The effects and costs of expanding the coverage of immunisation services in developing countries: a systematic literature review.

    Elisabetta Pegurri;Julia A. Fox-Rushby;Walker Damian

  • Economic evaluation of communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the published literature

    Damian Walker;Julia A. Fox-Rushby

  • Inequalities in purchase of mosquito nets and willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets in Nigeria: Challenges for malaria control interventions

    Obinna Onwujekwe;Obinna Onwujekwe;Kara Hanson;Julia Fox-Rushby

  • Household costs of 'malaria' morbidity: a study in Matale district, Sri Lanka.

    Nimal Attanayake;Julia Fox-Rushby;Anne Mills

  • Effect of a primary care walking intervention with and without nurse support on physical activity levels in 45- to 75-year-olds: The pedometer and consultation evaluation (PACE-UP) cluster randomised clinical trial

    Tess Harris;Sally M. Kerry;Elizabeth S. Limb;Christina R. Victor

  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Priority Setting

    Philip Musgrove;Julia Fox-Rushby

  • A crossover randomised controlled trial of oral mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (TOMADO)

    Timothy G Quinnell;Maxine Bennett;Jake Jordan;Abigail L Clutterbuck-James

  • The costs of preventing and treating chagas disease in Colombia

    Marianela Castillo-Riquelme;Felipe Guhl;Brenda Turriago;Nestor Pinto

  • Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3–4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care

    Tess Harris;Sally M Kerry;Elizabeth S Limb;Cheryl Furness

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda D. Sharples
Linda D. Sharples London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Peter H. Whincup
Peter H. Whincup St George's, University of London
Michael Ussher
Michael Ussher St George's, University of London
Derek G Cook
Derek G Cook St George's, University of London
Ulf Ekelund
Ulf Ekelund Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Christina R. Victor
Christina R. Victor Brunel University London
Steve Iliffe
Steve Iliffe University College London
Anne Mills
Anne Mills London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Obinna Onwujekwe
Obinna Onwujekwe University of Nigeria
Kara Hanson
Kara Hanson London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse career opportunities in psychology, counseling, social work, and therapy. Affordability is a key factor for many students, and programs like the cheapest psychology degree online allow you to start your academic journey without financial strain.

Flexibility is also important. If you’re aiming to become a social worker, look for msw online programs that offer both ease of admission and adaptable schedules. Aspiring psychologists interested in pursuing a doctorate should research the cheapest psyd programs to balance academic reputation with cost.

For those focused on becoming a therapist quickly, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs can help fast-track your path to a rewarding career. With a variety of online options available, students can specialize, upskill, and control their academic journey while preparing for meaningful roles in their chosen fields.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Fox-Rushby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles