World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
8157
World Ranking
3890
National Ranking
30

Michael Eduardo Reichenheim publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Eduardo Reichenheim sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 174 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Michael Eduardo Reichenheim D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Eduardo Reichenheim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Eduardo Reichenheim is affiliated with Rio de Janeiro State University in Brazil. Their research spans multiple disciplines, notably within the Social Sciences, Medicine, and Health Professions, with 35, 31, and 27 publications respectively in these fields.

The scientist's work covers a variety of subfields, including General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Clinical Psychology. These areas highlight a diverse approach to research addressing both social and clinical aspects of health.

Core topics of interest in their research include:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Pregnancy and Preeclampsia Studies

Reichenheim has published in several frequent venues, demonstrating engagement with a broad scientific community. These venues include:

  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations are:

  • Cláudia Leite de Moraes
  • Emanuele Souza Marques
  • João Luiz Bastos
  • Gilberto Kac
  • Dayana Rodrigues Farias

Some of their recent publications reflect a focus on health-related social issues and clinical research:

  • "A violência contra mulheres, crianças e adolescentes em tempos de pandemia pela COVID-19: panorama, motivações e formas de enfrentamento" (2020), published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • "Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review" (2021), published in Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
  • "Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women" (2020), published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • "Gestational weight gain charts: results from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium" (2020), published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • "National Trends and Disparities in Severe Food Insecurity in Brazil between 2004 and 2018" (2022), published in Current Developments in Nutrition

Best Publications

  • Operacionalização de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição usados em epidemiologia

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Health conditions and health-policy innovations in Brazil: the way forward

    Cesar Gomes Victora;Maurício Lima Barreto;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carlos Augusto Monteiro

  • Violence and injuries in Brazil: the effect, progress made, and challenges ahead

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Edinilsa Ramos de Souza;Claudia Leite Moraes;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Prado de Mello Jorge

  • Violence against women, children, and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Overview, contributing factors, and mitigating measures

    Emanuele Souza Marques;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Suely Ferreira Deslandes

  • Measuring mental health in a cost-effective manner.

    Trudy Harpham;Michael Reichenheim;Rebecca Oser;Elizabeth Thomas

  • Portuguese-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), an instrument used to identify violence in couples

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • Semantic equivalence of the Portuguese version of the Abuse Assessment Screen tool used for the screening of violence against pregnant women

    Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann

  • A review of functional status evaluation instruments in the elderly

    Carlos Montes Paixão Jr.;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • Domestic violence during pregnancy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Condições de saúde e inovações nas políticas de saúde no Brasil: o caminho a percorrer

    Cesar Gomes Victora;Mauricio Lima Barreto;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carlos Augusto Monteiro

  • Physical activity during pregnancy and maternal-child health outcomes: a systematic literature review

    Michael Maia Schlüssel;Elton Bicalho de Souza;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Gilberto Kac

  • Household food insecurity: a systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies.

    Emanuele S Marques;Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia L de Moraes;Marina M L Antunes

  • Cross-cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the Conflict Tactics Scales Form R (CTS-1) used to assess marital violence: semantic and measurement equivalence

    Maria Helena Hasselmann;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression

    Michael E Reichenheim;Evandro S F Coutinho;Evandro S F Coutinho

  • Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • The magnitude of intimate partner violence in Brazil: portraits from 15 capital cities and the Federal District

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;André Szklo;Maria Helena Hasselmann

  • Comparison between the abuse assessment screen and the revised conflict tactics scales for measuring physical violence during pregnancy

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Gestational weight gain differentials in the presence of intimate partner violence

    Claudia Leite Moraes;A. R. Amorim;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Conseqüências da violência familiar na saúde da criança e do adolescente: contribuições para a elaboração de propostas de ação

    Michael E. Reichenheim;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Rastreamento de uso de álcool por gestantes de serviços públicos de saúde do Rio de Janeiro

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Equivalência semântica da versão em português do instrumento Abuse Assessment Screen para rastrear a violência contra a mulher grávida* Semantic equivalence of the Portuguese version of the Abuse Assessment Screen tool used for the screening of violence against pregnant women

    Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudia Leite Moraes
Claudia Leite Moraes Rio de Janeiro State University
Mauricio Lima Barreto
Mauricio Lima Barreto Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho Rio de Janeiro State University
Eduardo Faerstein
Eduardo Faerstein Rio de Janeiro State University
Marilia Sá Carvalho
Marilia Sá Carvalho Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Ivan Figueira
Ivan Figueira Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Johan Fritzell
Johan Fritzell Karolinska Institute
Dóra Chor
Dóra Chor Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Maria Inês Schmidt
Maria Inês Schmidt Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to rewarding careers in areas such as social work, counseling, psychology, and family therapy. Today, more universities in the USA are offering accelerated and flexible study options for busy professionals.

If you are passionate about helping individuals and communities, consider the 1 year msw programs, which allow you to earn a Master of Social Work in less time than traditional pathways. For those interested in psychology, online degrees are available that let you complete your studies efficiently, such as a 2 year psychology degree online.

Students interested in counseling should look for programs that meet rigorous accreditation standards. Choosing cacrep accredited counseling programs ensures your education meets industry benchmarks and enhances your employability. Additionally, for those wishing to specialize in supporting families, pursuing a marriage and family therapy degree online can be a flexible and affordable route to a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles