World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
7072
World Ranking
9733
National Ranking
5141

Joan Stiles publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Stiles sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joan Stiles D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Stiles sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joan Stiles conducts research primarily in the field of neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience as a subfield. Their academic affiliation is with the University of California, San Diego in the United States.

The main topics covered in their work include hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, motor control and adaptation, and face recognition and perception. These topics reflect an interest in understanding brain function lateralization, disorders related to hemispheric damage, as well as processes related to motor behavior and visual cognition.

  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Joan Stiles frequently collaborates with a number of researchers. These frequent co-authors include Natacha Akshoomoff, Frank Haist, Pamela Moses, Alessandra M. Passarotti, and Frederic Dick. The collaboration counts indicate particularly strong ongoing partnerships with Natacha Akshoomoff and Frank Haist.

  • Natacha Akshoomoff
  • Frank Haist
  • Pamela Moses
  • Alessandra M. Passarotti
  • Frederic Dick

Although no specific publication venues or recent papers are highlighted, the scholar's focus on neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience suggests their work is situated within these academic domains.

Best Publications

  • The Basics of Brain Development

    Joan Stiles;Terry L. Jernigan;Terry L. Jernigan

  • Improved memory functioning and frontal lobe maturation between childhood and adolescence: A structural MRI study

    Elizabeth R. Sowell;Dean Delis;Joan Stiles;Terry L. Jernigan

  • Early lexical development in children with focal brain injury

    Donna J. Thal;Virginia A. Marchman;Joan Stiles;Dorothy Aram

  • Neural plasticity and cognitive development.

    Joan Stiles

  • The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study

    Alessandra M. Passarotti;Brianna M. Paul;Joseph R. Bussiere;Richard B. Buxton

  • Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing : evidence from fMRI

    A Martinez;P Moses;L Frank;R Buxton

  • Cognitive development following early brain injury: evidence for neural adaptation

    Joan Stiles;Judy Reilly;Judy Reilly;Brianna Paul;Pamela Moses

  • Developmental Trends in Visuospatial Analysis and Planning: I. Copying a Complex Figure

    Natacha A. Akshoomoff;Joan Stiles

  • Postnatal brain development: structural imaging of dynamic neurodevelopmental processes.

    Terry L Jernigan;William F C Baaré;Joan Stiles;Kathrine Skak Madsen

  • Functional MRI of Global and Local Processing in Children

    Pamela Moses;Katherine Roe;Richard B. Buxton;Eric C. Wong

  • Spatial grouping activity in young children with congenital right or left hemisphere brain injury.

    Joan Stiles;Ruth Nass

  • Children's analysis of hierarchical patterns: evidence from a similarity judgment task.

    Dianne Dukette;Joan Stiles

  • Face and place processing in Williams syndrome: evidence for a dorsal-ventral dissociation.

    Brianna M. Paul;Joan Stiles;Alessandra Passarotti;Nasim Bavar

  • The effects of stimulus density on children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns

    Unknown

  • Developmental change in children's analysis of spatial patterns.

    Wendy L. Tada;Joan Stiles

  • The impact of early unilateral brain injury on perceptual organization and visual memory.

    Natacha A Akshoomoff;Corbin C Feroleto;Rebecca E Doyle;Joan Stiles

  • On Genes, Brains, and Behavior: Why Should Developmental Psychologists Care About Brain Development?

    Joan Stiles

  • How 'generalized' is the 'slowed processing' in SLI? The case of visuospatial attentional orienting.

    Rina Schul;Joan Stiles;Beverly Wulfeck;Jeanne Townsend

  • The development of attentional orienting during the school‐age years

    Rina Schul;Jeanne Townsend;Joan Stiles

  • Brain and Cognitive Development

    Joan Stiles;Timothy T. Brown;Frank Haist;Terry L. Jernigan

  • Regional Size Reduction in the Human Corpus Callosum Following Pre- and Perinatal Brain Injury

    Pamela Moses;Eric Courchesne;Joan Stiles;Doris Trauner

Frequent Co-Authors

Doris A. Trauner
Doris A. Trauner University of California, San Diego
Richard B. Buxton
Richard B. Buxton University of California, San Diego
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Judy Reilly
Judy Reilly San Diego State University
John R. Hesselink
John R. Hesselink University of California, San Diego
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego
Beverly Wulfeck
Beverly Wulfeck San Diego State University
Jeanne Townsend
Jeanne Townsend University of California, San Diego
Antigona Martinez
Antigona Martinez Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of career pathways, including clinical roles, counseling, organizational consulting, education, and research. Many universities now offer flexible online programs, making it easier for students to balance study and work commitments while gaining a quality education.

When considering where to study, it's important to compare programs for their value and reputation. For instance, those interested in the Southeast can check out the best value psychology programs in Jacksonville, which offer strong academic preparation and affordable tuition. Prospective students in the Northeast may prefer to examine the most valuable psychology degrees in New Jersey or the most valuable psychology degrees in New York for programs with excellent career outcomes.

For those in the Southwest, the most valuable psychology programs in Phoenix combine flexibility with a wide range of specializations. No matter your location, choosing an online psychology degree tailored to your interests and budget is the first step toward a rewarding and dynamic career in this ever-evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Joan Stiles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles