World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Brazil
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 75 553 479 6 6 319 19325

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Célia Landmann Szwarcwald between 1985 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Célia Landmann Szwarcwald published across 39 years, from 1985 to 2023, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2021. 33 of the 391 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2021. 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 48 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 11 publications
1985 2023

391 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Célia Landmann Szwarcwald: publications per year, 1985 to 2023
Year Publications
1985 3
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 8
1997 3
1998 7
1999 6
2000 19
2001 9
2002 9
2003 3
2004 8
2005 18
2006 4
2007 7
2008 7
2009 4
2010 5
2011 21
2012 10
2013 4
2014 14
2015 40
2016 11
2017 19
2018 13
2019 24
2020 24
2021 48
2022 22
2023 11
Total 391
Download as CSV

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Célia Landmann Szwarcwald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 319 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 319
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Célia Landmann Szwarcwald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45 75
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Disease
  • Internal medicine

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald mainly investigates Demography, Gerontology, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Poverty and Prenatal care. The Demography study combines topics in areas such as Logistic regression, Developing country, Infant mortality, Socioeconomic status and Risk factor. As part of one scientific family, Célia Landmann Szwarcwald deals mainly with the area of Logistic regression, narrowing it down to issues related to the Design effect, and often Confidence interval.

Her work deals with themes such as Disease and Public health, which intersect with Gerontology. Her work on Heterosexual transmission as part of general Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome study is frequently linked to Social inequality, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Her research integrates issues of Family support, Childbirth, Fertility and Low birth weight in her study of Prenatal care.

Her most cited work include:

  • AIDS e infecção pelo HIV no Brasil: uma epidemia multifacetada (226 citations)
  • Population-based evidence of a strong decline in the prevalence of smokers in Brazil (1989-2003) (214 citations)
  • Pesquisa Nacional de Saude no Brasil: concepcao e metodologia de aplicacao (173 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary areas of investigation include Demography, Environmental health, Gerontology, Logistic regression and Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Her Demography research includes elements of Epidemiology, Confidence interval, Developing country, Infant mortality and Socioeconomic status. Her work investigates the relationship between Environmental health and topics such as National health that intersect with problems in Brazilian population and Gynecology.

Her Gerontology study combines topics in areas such as Human sexuality and Health services. The study incorporates disciplines such as Odds ratio, Body mass index and Depression in addition to Logistic regression. Her study in Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Poverty and Incidence.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Demography (39.73%)
  • Environmental health (20.55%)
  • Gerontology (16.44%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Demography (39.73%)
  • Logistic regression (15.07%)
  • Environmental health (20.55%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Célia Landmann Szwarcwald mostly deals with Demography, Logistic regression, Environmental health, Humanities and Odds ratio. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Body mass index, Psychological intervention, Obesity, Epidemiology and Mental health. Célia Landmann Szwarcwald has researched Epidemiology in several fields, including Seroepidemiologic Studies and Infant mortality.

Her studies in Logistic regression integrate themes in fields like Young adult, Depression and Confidence interval. As part of the same scientific family, Célia Landmann Szwarcwald usually focuses on Environmental health, concentrating on Health care and intersecting with Socioeconomic status. Her research investigates the connection between Sex work and topics such as Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome that intersect with problems in Syphilis.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990-2016: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (117 citations)
  • Saúde reprodutiva, materna, neonatal e infantil nos 30 anos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) (41 citations)
  • Prevalence estimates of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C among female sex workers (FSW) in Brazil, 2016. (26 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Disease
  • Internal medicine

Her primary areas of investigation include Demography, Logistic regression, Confidence interval, Syphilis and Sex work. She combines subjects such as Cancer, Menstruation and Leisure physical activity with her study of Demography. Her Logistic regression study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Odds ratio, Mental health and Tv viewing.

Her research in Confidence interval intersects with topics in Cross-sectional study and Environmental health. Her Syphilis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Condom, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Psychological intervention, Sexual violence and Female sex. Célia Landmann Szwarcwald has included themes like Health care, Young adult, Odds, Public health and Stigma in her Sex work study.

Best Publications

  • Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges

    César Gomes Victora;Estela Maria Motta Lima Leão de Aquino;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carlos Augusto Monteiro

  • AIDS e infecção pelo HIV no Brasil: uma epidemia multifacetada

    Ana Maria de Brito;Euclides Ayres de Castilho;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

  • Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990-2016: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Fatima Marinho;Valéria Maria de Azeredo Passos;Deborah Carvalho Malta;Elizabeth Barboza França

  • Pesquisa Nacional de Saude no Brasil: concepcao e metodologia de aplicacao

    Celia Landmann Szwarcwald;Deborah Carvalho Malta;Cimar Azeredo Pereira;Maria Lucia França Pontes Vieira

  • Population-based evidence of a strong decline in the prevalence of smokers in Brazil (1989-2003)

    Carlos Augusto Monteiro;Tania Maria Cavalcante;Erly Catarina Moura;Rafael Moreira Claro

  • Relato de tristeza/depressão, nervosismo/ansiedade e problemas de sono na população adulta brasileira durante a pandemia de COVID-19

    Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros;Margareth Guimarães Lima;Deborah Carvalho Malta;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

  • The COVID-19 Pandemic and changes in adult Brazilian lifestyles: a cross-sectional study, 2020.

    Deborah Carvalho Malta;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros;Crizian Saar Gomes

  • Uma metodologia de avaliação do desempenho do sistema de saúde brasileiro

    Francisco Viacava;Célia Almeida;Rosângela Caetano;Márcia Cristina Rodrigues Fausto

  • Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000

    Celia Almeida;Paula Braveman;Marthe R Gold;Celia L Szwarcwald

  • Prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013

    Betine Pinto Moehlecke Iser;Sheila Rizzato Stopa;Patrícia Sampaio Chueiri;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

  • Principais causas da mortalidade na infância no Brasil, em 1990 e 2015: estimativas do estudo de Carga Global de Doença.

    Elisabeth Barboza França;Sônia Lansky;Maria Albertina Santiago Rego;Deborah Carvalho Malta

  • Gravidez na adolescência como fator de risco para baixo peso ao nascer no Município do Rio de Janeiro, 1996 a 1998

    Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Maria do Carmo Leal;Mariza Miranda Theme Filha

  • Saúde reprodutiva, materna, neonatal e infantil nos 30 anos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)

    Maria do Carmo Leal;Celia Landmann Szwarcwald;Paulo Vicente Bonilha Almeida;Estela Maria Leão Aquino

  • Fatores associados à morbi-mortalidade perinatal em uma amostra de maternidades públicas e privadas do Município do Rio de Janeiro, 1999-2001

    Maria do Carmo Leal;Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama;Mônica Rodrigues Campos;Luciana Tricai Cavalini

  • AIDS e pauperização: principais conceitos e evidências empíricas

    Francisco Inácio Bastos;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

  • [The spread of the AIDs epidemic in Brazil from 1987 to 1996: a spatial analysis]

    Celia Landmann Szwarcwald;Francisco Inácio Bastos;Maria Angela Pires Esteves;Carla L. Tavares de Andrade

  • Health care users' satisfaction in Brazil, 2003

    Giselle Campozana Gouveia;Wayner Vieira de Souza;Carlos F. Luna;Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza-Júnior

  • Consumo de alimentos não saudáveis relacionados a doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013

    Rafael Moreira Claro;Maria Aline Siqueira Santos;Tais Porto Oliveira;Cimar Azeredo Pereira

  • Infecção pelo HIV durante a gestação: estudo-Sentinela Parturiente, Brasil, 2002

    Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Júnior;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Aristides Barbosa Júnior;Marcelo Felga de Carvalho

  • [Pregnancy in adolescence, associated factors, and perinatal results among low-income post-partum women].

    Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Maria do Carmo Leal

  • Use of and access to health services in Brazil, 2013 National Health Survey

    Sheila Rizzato Stopa;Deborah Carvalho Malta;Camila Nascimento Monteiro;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

  • Desenho da amostra Nascer no Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional sobre Parto e Nascimento

    Mauricio Teixeira Leite de Vasconcellos;Pedro Luis do Nascimento Silva;Ana Paula Esteves Pereira;Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz

  • [Infant mortality estimation in Brazil: what do Ministry of Health data on deaths and live births say?].

    Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carla Lourenço Tavares de Andrade;Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Jr.

  • A pandemia da COVID-19 e as mudanças no estilo de vida dos brasileiros adultos: um estudo transversal, 2020

    Deborah Carvalho Malta;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros;Crizian Saar Gomes

  • Prevalence of stroke and associated disability in Brazil: National Health Survey - 2013

    Isabela M. Bensenor;Alessandra C. Goulart;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald;Maria Lucia França Pontes Vieira

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah Carvalho Malta
Deborah Carvalho Malta Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brendon Stubbs
Brendon Stubbs Medical University of Vienna
Cesar G. Victora
Cesar G. Victora Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Paulo A. Lotufo
Paulo A. Lotufo Universidade de São Paulo
Bruce Bartholow Duncan
Bruce Bartholow Duncan Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Luís B. Sardinha
Luís B. Sardinha University of Lisbon
Mauricio Lima Barreto
Mauricio Lima Barreto Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Christovam Barcellos
Christovam Barcellos Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Maria Inês Schmidt
Maria Inês Schmidt Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Isabela M. Benseñor
Isabela M. Benseñor Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The USA offers diverse online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities, enabling students to prepare for impactful careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Online learning provides flexibility, affordability, and access to accredited programs across the country.

For those interested in mental health counseling, earning a cacrep online masters in counseling ensures you meet recognized standards vital for licensure and practice. If your passion lies in helping families and couples, a marriage and family therapist degree online prepares you for specialized roles with increasing demand.

A bachelor of science in psychology opens doors to entry-level positions and graduate study, while flexible msw programs with high acceptance rate are a great way to launch a social work career serving diverse communities.

Each online degree paves the way for varied career pathways, fostering skills to make a positive difference in individuals' lives and society as a whole.

Best Scientists Citing Célia Landmann Szwarcwald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles