World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5422 5031 35 34 114 5738

Claudia Leite Moraes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia Leite Moraes between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia Leite Moraes published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2025. 21 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2025. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 15 publications
1998 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia Leite Moraes: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 4
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 8
2007 6
2008 6
2009 5
2010 4
2011 12
2012 8
2013 1
2014 7
2015 9
2016 6
2017 5
2018 3
2019 3
2020 13
2021 6
2022 11
2023 4
2024 6
2025 15
Total 151
Download as CSV

Claudia Leite Moraes publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Leite Moraes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 114
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia Leite Moraes D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Leite Moraes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia Leite Moraes is affiliated with Rio de Janeiro State University in Brazil. Their research spans multiple domains within social sciences and health professions, with a particular focus on public health issues and social determinants affecting vulnerable populations.

Their work includes extensive investigation into violence and health, particularly intimate partner and family violence, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and child abuse and trauma. Specific research topics covered also include sex work and related issues, gestational diabetes research and management, family and patient care in intensive care units, and infant development and preterm care.

Claudia Leite Moraes has contributed to a variety of scientific journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
  • Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

Their scholarly output includes publications with topics ranging from violence against women, children, and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic to bodily image dissatisfaction in adolescents and violence against the elderly during the pandemic in Brazil. Representative recent papers include:

  • "A violência contra mulheres, crianças e adolescentes em tempos de pandemia pela COVID-19: panorama, motivações e formas de enfrentamento" (2020) published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • "Insatisfação com a imagem corporal e fatores associados em adolescentes" (2020) published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
  • "Violência contra idosos durante a pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil: contribuições para seu enfrentamento" (2020) published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
  • "Violência contra crianças e adolescentes em Manaus, Amazonas: estudo descritivo dos casos e análise da completude das fichas de notificação, 2009-2016" (2020) published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
  • "Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium: establishment, data harmonization and basic characteristics" (2020) published in Scientific Reports

Collaborative work characterizes much of their research, with frequent co-authors including Michael Eduardo Reichenheim, Emanuele Souza Marques, Stella Regina Taquette, Luciane Stochero, and Fernanda Lima-Setta.

In terms of academic focus, their main fields of study cover:

  • Social Sciences
  • Health Professions

The subfields represented in their work emphasize:

  • General Health Professions
  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Best Publications

  • Operacionalização de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição usados em epidemiologia

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Violence and injuries in Brazil: the effect, progress made, and challenges ahead

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Edinilsa Ramos de Souza;Claudia Leite Moraes;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Prado de Mello Jorge

  • Violence against women, children, and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Overview, contributing factors, and mitigating measures

    Emanuele Souza Marques;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Suely Ferreira Deslandes

  • Portuguese-language cross-cultural adaptation of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), an instrument used to identify violence in couples

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • Semantic equivalence of the Portuguese version of the Abuse Assessment Screen tool used for the screening of violence against pregnant women

    Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann

  • Domestic violence during pregnancy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Household food insecurity: a systematic review of the measuring instruments used in epidemiological studies.

    Emanuele S Marques;Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia L de Moraes;Marina M L Antunes

  • School bullying: A systematic review of contextual-level risk factors in observational studies

    Catarina Machado Azeredo;Ana Elisa Madalena Rinaldi;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Renata Bertazzi Levy

  • Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael E. Reichenheim

  • The magnitude of intimate partner violence in Brazil: portraits from 15 capital cities and the Federal District

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;André Szklo;Maria Helena Hasselmann

  • Comparison between the abuse assessment screen and the revised conflict tactics scales for measuring physical violence during pregnancy

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Gestational weight gain differentials in the presence of intimate partner violence

    Claudia Leite Moraes;A. R. Amorim;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Conseqüências da violência familiar na saúde da criança e do adolescente: contribuições para a elaboração de propostas de ação

    Michael E. Reichenheim;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Maria Helena Hasselmann;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Rastreamento de uso de álcool por gestantes de serviços públicos de saúde do Rio de Janeiro

    Claudia Leite Moraes;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • Insatisfação com a imagem corporal e fatores associados em adolescentes

    Giulia Xavier de Carvalho;Ana Paula Nogueira Nunes;Claudia Leite Moraes;Gloria Valeria da Veiga

  • Violência contra idosos durante a pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil: contribuições para seu enfrentamento

    Claudia Leite de Moraes;Emanuele Souza Marques;Adalgisa Peixoto Ribeiro;Edinilsa Ramos de Souza

  • Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): empirical evidence for a general factor.

    Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia L Moraes;Claudia L Moraes;Alessandra S D Oliveira;Gustavo Lobato

  • Rompendo o silêncio e suas barreiras: um inquérito domiciliar sobre a violência doméstica contra idosos em área de abrangência do Programa Médico de Família de Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    Claudia Leite de Moraes;Claudia Leite de Moraes;Paulo Cavalcante Apratto Júnior;Michael Eduardo Reichenheim

  • [Co-occurrence of physical violence against partners and their children in health services].

    Michael Eduardo Reichenheim;Alessandra Silva Dias;Claudia Leite Moraes

  • Severe physical violence between intimate partners during pregnancy: a risk factor for early cessation of exclusive breast-feeding

    Claudia L. Moraes;Alessandra S. Dias de Oliveira;Michael E. Reichenheim;Gustavo Lobato

  • Equivalência semântica da versão em português do instrumento Abuse Assessment Screen para rastrear a violência contra a mulher grávida* Semantic equivalence of the Portuguese version of the Abuse Assessment Screen tool used for the screening of violence against pregnant women

    Michael E Reichenheim;Claudia Leite Moraes;Maria Helena Hasselmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Eduardo Reichenheim
Michael Eduardo Reichenheim Rio de Janeiro State University
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho
Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho Rio de Janeiro State University
Ivan Figueira
Ivan Figueira Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Claudia S. Lopes
Claudia S. Lopes Rio de Janeiro State University
Mauro V. Mendlowicz
Mauro V. Mendlowicz Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Renata Bertazzi Levy
Renata Bertazzi Levy Universidade de São Paulo
Margo Wilson
Margo Wilson McMaster University
Louise M. Howard
Louise M. Howard King's College London
Martin Daly
Martin Daly McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a range of online degree options that can lead to impactful careers. Students interested in social work can explore an msw degree to gain essential skills for clinical and community roles. For those seeking a faster route, an accelerated masters in social work provides a way to complete advanced studies more quickly.

Applied behavior analysis is in high demand, and students may consider enrolling in bcba accredited programs online, which prepare graduates for professional certification. Those drawn to psychology will find flexible options such as a 2-year psychology degree online, ideal for fast-tracking entry into mental health or research roles.

These online programs offer affordability, accreditation, and convenience for learners worldwide. By exploring these pathways, students can align their studies with personal interests and evolving workplace needs in the Social Sciences and Humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Leite Moraes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles