World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
65
Citations
122864
World Ranking
996
National Ranking
464

John W. Creswell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Creswell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John W. Creswell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Creswell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Creswell is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on health professions, with significant contributions across related subfields such as general health professions, sociology and political science, management science and operations research, public health, environmental and occupational health, and statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

The primary topics addressed in their work include health policy implementation science, evaluation and performance assessment, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, management and organizational studies, quality and supply management, qualitative comparative analysis research, and community health and development.

Notable recent publications authored or coauthored by Creswell include:

  • "Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies" (2020) published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research
  • "Applying Core Quality Criteria of Mixed Methods Research to an Empirical Study" (2022) published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research
  • "Generating metainferences in mixed methods research: A worked example in convergent mixed methods designs" (2023) published in Methodological Innovations
  • "My 35 Years in Mixed Methods Research" (2024) published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research
  • "Understanding mechanisms of change in a family-based preventive mental health intervention for refugees by refugees in New England" (2022) published in Transcultural Psychiatry

Creswell frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Ahtisham Younas, Sergi Fàbregues, Timothy C. Guetterman, M. Clarke, and Robert Harrison.

The Journal of Mixed Methods Research is the most common venue for Creswell's work, with five publications. Other journals include Methodological Innovations, Journal of General and Family Medicine, Transcultural Psychiatry, and BMC Medical Research Methodology.

Best Publications

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W. Creswell;Vicki L. Plano Clark

  • Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry

    Unknown

  • Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed.

    John W. Creswell

  • Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed.

    John W. Creswell

  • Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation

    John W. Creswell;William E. Hanson;Vicki L. Clark Plano;Alejandro Morales

  • Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices

    Michael D. Fetters;Leslie A. Curry;John W. Creswell

  • A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research

    John W. Creswell

  • The mixed methods reader

    Vicki L. Plano Clark;John W. Creswell

  • Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice

    Nataliya V. Ivankova;John W. Creswell;Sheldon L. Stick

  • Mixed Methods Research Designs in Counseling Psychology.

    William E. Hanson;John W. Creswell;Vicki L. Plano Clark;Kelly S. Petska

  • Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

    Heidi M. Levitt;Michael Bamberg;John W. Creswell;David M. Frost

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed.

    John W. Creswell

  • Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays.

    Timothy C. Guetterman;Michael D. Fetters;John W. Creswell

  • Designing A Mixed Methods Study In Primary Care

    John W. Creswell;Michael D. Fetters;Nataliya V. Ivankova

  • Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods:

    Abbas Tashakkori;John W. Creswell

  • Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in Health Sciences: (566732013-001)

    John W. Creswell;Ann Carroll Klassen;Vicki L. Plano Clark;Katherine Clegg Smith

  • Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches.

    Unknown

  • Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research

    John W. Creswell

  • 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher

    John W. Creswell

  • How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research.

    John W. Creswell;Ron Shope;Vicki L. Plano Clark;Denise O. Green

  • Narrative Research: A Comparison of Two Restorying Data Analysis Approaches:

    jo Anne Ollerenshaw;John W. Creswell

  • Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition.

    John W. Creswell;Timothy C. Guetterman

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael D. Fetters
Michael D. Fetters University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. David Creswell
J. David Creswell Carnegie Mellon University
Leslie A. Curry
Leslie A. Curry Yale University
Timothy P. Hofer
Timothy P. Hofer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rodney A. Hayward
Rodney A. Hayward University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sanjay Saint
Sanjay Saint University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael A. Neblo
Michael A. Neblo The Ohio State University
James H. McMillan
James H. McMillan Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing an online degree in the social sciences or humanities unlocks a wide range of career opportunities in fields such as counseling, psychology, and social work. Many students opt for a bachelor of science in psychology as a foundation, preparing them for roles in education, business, or mental health care.

For those interested in direct practice or clinical work, pursuing advanced degrees online is becoming more accessible and affordable. Options like 1 year msw programs online no bsw appeal to career changers seeking flexibility and accelerated learning. Graduates can pursue roles such as licensed social workers or community advocates.

Aspiring mental health professionals may consider the cheapest psyd programs online, ideal for those focused on clinical psychology and research. For those drawn to family therapy, choosing from the best online mft programs can open doors to counseling careers in diverse settings. These flexible pathways offer opportunities to make a meaningful impact while balancing personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Creswell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles